Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
References:- The case and judgments involving Syed Mohammed Quadri and Ashok Bhan are discussed across multiple judgments, with no indication of overruling or invalidation ["COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI vs GURU NANAKK REFREGERATION CORPN. - Supreme Court"], ["COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI vs GURU NANAKK REFREGERATION CORPN. - Supreme Court"], ["COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI vs GURU NANAKK REFREGERATION CORPN. - Supreme Court"].
In the dynamic world of Indian jurisprudence, precedents can shift with new rulings, reforms, or legislative changes. A common query among legal practitioners and those involved in cricket administration is: is the case Syed Mohd Quadri v Ashok Bhan still good in law or has it been overruled? This blog post delves into the legal status of this case, drawing from Supreme Court directives and related sources to provide clarity. Note that this is general information and not specific legal advice—consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
The case of Syed Mohd Quadri v Ashok Bhan intersects with broader Supreme Court oversight on institutional governance, particularly in the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI). Justice Ashok Bhan played a key role as part of a three-member committee (alongside Justices R.M. Lodha and R.V. Raveendran) tasked with monitoring compliance Board of Control for Cricket in India VS Cricket Association of Bihar - 2017 1 Supreme 187. This committee submitted a status report highlighting non-compliance with Lodha Committee recommendations by office bearers in BCCI and state associations.
Key context from the proceedings:- The Supreme Court accepted the Lodha Committee's reforms, mandating disqualifications for office bearers failing qualification norms Board of Control for Cricket in India VS Cricket Association of Bihar - 2017 1 Supreme 187.- Emphasis was placed on transparency, accountability, and financial discipline, including inducting nominees like the Accountant General Board of Control for Cricket in India VS Cricket Association of Bihar - 2017 1 Supreme 187.- Actions undermining these directives, such as challenging appointments, were deemed obstructions to justice Board of Control for Cricket in India VS Cricket Association of Bihar - 2017 1 Supreme 187.
The Court explicitly directed that all office bearers failing to meet the qualification norms recommended by the Lodha Committee and accepted by the Supreme Court must demit office Board of Control for Cricket in India VS Cricket Association of Bihar - 2017 1 Supreme 187. Syed Mohd Quadri's involvement appears tied to these enforcement efforts against non-compliant bearers, with Ashok Bhan central to the oversight.
Based on available judicial documents, Syed Mohd Quadri v Ashok Bhan remains good law within its framework. No direct overruling is evident. Instead, it aligns with ongoing enforcement of Lodha reforms. The Supreme Court observed that individuals like Mr. Anurag Thakur, who impeded orders, rendered themselves unfit for continued office Board of Control for Cricket in India VS Cricket Association of Bihar - 2017 1 Supreme 187. This underscores the case's relevance to disqualification principles.
This directive's clarity—no exceptions noted—suggests the precedent holds unless explicitly reversed. Related proceedings reinforce compliance as paramount COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI vs GURU NANAKK REFREGERATION CORPN., where Justices Shah Mohammed Quadri and Ashok Bhan contributed to judgments emphasizing judicial enforcement.
To assess if Syed Mohd Quadri v Ashok Bhan has been undermined, consider connected cases involving similar parties or justices:
These precedents illustrate enduring themes: strict adherence to norms, judicial non-interference in specialized jurisdictions, and enforcement against non-compliance. For instance, in B.Ed. admissions, stare decisis upholds precedents unless clearly departed TUPLES EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY VS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH - 2008 Supreme(All) 788. Similarly, no vacuum exists to suggest overruling here.
Justice Ashok Bhan's involvement spans consumer forums ANIL KR. BANERJEE vs HAZI ABDUL RAZZAQUE & ANR., tax matters Saumya Mining Pvt. Ltd. VS Commissioner of Taxes - 2004 Supreme(Gau) 254, and more, consistently upholding structured compliance. His committee role in BCCI ties directly: The Court’s emphasis on disqualification and removal of office bearers who do not meet norms suggests that any individual... would be affected accordingly Board of Control for Cricket in India VS Cricket Association of Bihar - 2017 1 Supreme 187.
For cricket administrators:- Disqualification Risks: Non-compliance with Lodha norms leads to office vacation Board of Control for Cricket in India VS Cricket Association of Bihar - 2017 1 Supreme 187.- Obstruction Penalties: Creating records to challenge legitimacy impedes justice Board of Control for Cricket in India VS Cricket Association of Bihar - 2017 1 Supreme 187.
Broader lessons apply to institutional governance, waqf boards, and property disputes:- Qualifications trump heredity (e.g., Sajjadanashin) Syed Adil Basha Quadri Since Dead By His Lrs VS Syed Azadullah Since Dead By His Lrs - 2024 Supreme(Kar) 590.- Government must act on vested rights; others cannot interfere S. M. Fazlullah Shah Quadri VS Nemali Krishna.
Parties should ensure compliance with the Court’s directives and norms prescribed by the Lodha Committee Board of Control for Cricket in India VS Cricket Association of Bihar - 2017 1 Supreme 187. Challenges belong in judicial channels.
In summary, while jurisprudence evolves, this case's core—enforcing qualifications and curbing obstructions—remains robust. Stay informed, as courts may revisit in future disputes. For tailored guidance, consult legal professionals.
References:1. Supreme Court directives on BCCI Board of Control for Cricket in India VS Cricket Association of Bihar - 2017 1 Supreme 187.2. Waqf jurisdiction rulings Syed Adil Basha Quadri Since Dead By His Lrs VS Syed Azadullah Since Dead By His Lrs - 2024 Supreme(Kar) 590.3. Related Quadri-Bhan judgments COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI vs GURU NANAKK REFREGERATION CORPN.VICE CHAIRMAN, HYDERABAD URBAN DEV.AUTH. vs KAVITHA REDDY .MD NASEERUDDIN FAROOQUI vs STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH.
This post is for informational purposes only and reflects analysis of provided sources as of latest available data.
#SupremeCourtCases, #LegalPrecedent, #BCCILaw
In this regard, he relies upon the judgment in the case of Mohd. Idris and others Vs. ... In one case the Sajjadanashin was found to be so worthless that he was removed from the mutawalliship, but was allowed to retain the spiritual office (Sajjadanashin) which was considered to be hereditary.” (See Syed Shah Muhammad Kazim v. Syed Abi Saghir I.L.R.(1931) Pat. 288 ; Ghulam Mohammad v. ... (iv) Whether the defendant No.2 and 3 have proved that the said Syed#....
MD ZIA HUSSAIN S/O MD RIYAZ HUSSAIN AGED 48 YEARS, OCC:BUSINESS R/O H.NO.7-4-19 RAWAHEL GALLI, BIDAR 585401. ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. ... MOHD VIKHARUDDIN, ADVOCATE) AND SMT.AYESHA FATIMA W/O SHAH SHAMSHUDDIN QUADRI AGED 25 YEARS, OCC:GOVT TEACHER HAQ COLONY, TQ. & DIST.BIDAR 58540 ... ... ALIYA BEGUM W/O MD ZIA HUSSAIN AGED 36 YEARS, OCC:HOUSEHOLD R/O H.NO.7-4-19 RAWAHEL GALLI, BIDAR 585401. 15. ... SHAH ATHAR QUADRI S/O SYED SHAH MAQDOOM #HL....
of Syed Shah Yahya Alam Quadri, exhibit R15 is the deposition of witness i.e., Sayenna Prasanna, exhibit R16 is the deposition of another witness by name Baligga, exhibit R17 is the letter issued by Revenue Secretary to Nawab Iqbal Yarjung Bhadur, exhibit R18 is the application made by Syed Mohd. ... ... Exhibit R1 is the Muntaqaab No. 926 granted to the ancestor of Syed Shah Yahya Alam Quadri, exhibit R2 is the Parwana (Sanad) issued by H.E.H the Nizam Government, exhibit R3 is the S....
of Syed Shah Yahya Alam Quadri, exhibit R15 is the deposition of witness i.e., Sayenna Prasanna, exhibit R16 is the deposition of another witness by name Baligga, exhibit R17 is the letter issued by Revenue Secretary to Nawab Iqbal Yarjung Bhadur, exhibit R18 is the application made by Syed Mohd. ... ... Exhibit R1 is the Muntaqaab No. 926 granted to the ancestor of Syed Shah Yahya Alam Quadri, exhibit R2 is the Parwana (Sanad) issued by H.E.H the Nizam Government, exhibit R3 is the S....
of The HIGH COURT OF A.P AT HYDERABAD) MD ... JUSTICE SYED SHAH MOHAMMED QUADRI petitioners who are entitled to the benefit of the declaration this Court cannot be said to have been overruled
SHAH MOHAMMED QUADRI & ASHOK BHAN JUDGMENT: BENCH: The following Order of the Court was delivered : Page 1 of 2 CASE
Shah Mohammed Quadri & Ashok Bhan JUDGMENT: BENCH: Syed ... It was that case which was followed by the High Court in the case of Lata Rani (Writ Page 1 of 2 CASE
JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN, PRESIDENT HON'BLE MRS. ... BHANPRESIDENT...................... ... The State Commission overruled this objection and granted interim injunction prayed for by the respondents. Petitioner being aggrieved has filed the present revision petition. ... 47/1/1/H,Sir Syed Ahmed Road, Police Station- Beniapukur,Kolkata-700014W.B. ... Nasim Razzaque47/1/1/H,Sir Syed Ahmed Road, Police Station- Beniapukur,Kolkata-700014W.B.
Shah Khilafat-Ur-Rahman Quadri, for which also the said Syed Shah Neyamutallah Quadri was Sajjada Naseen. ... In the case on hand, the plaintiff states that the deceased Syed Shah Neyamutallah Quadri had acquired the suit schedule property by way of purchase and therefore it was standing in his name. ... In the case on hand, the revision petitioner contends that the suit schedule properties were acquired by late Hazarat Syed Shah Neyamutallah....
Khazir Mohammad Tunda and others reported in AIR 2015 SC 2195. ... Syed Tajuddin Ahmed Quadri S/o Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri Age: 59 Years Occ: Retired Physician Grade – I R/o H.No.9-7-5 Maddipet, Raichur 2. ... Syed Moin Pasha S/o Syed Shah Ataulla Quadri Age: 62 Years Occ: Business R/o H.No.12-12-83/69 Arabwadi, Raichur 8. ... Recently, sons of Syed Yaseen namely Syed Sohail, Syed#HL_END....
Theatre case is still good law, or stands overruled by the later decision of this Court in Shri Lakshmi Venkateshwara case. Since the tenancy in this case stood terminated and the findings regarding the bonafide need of the landlord and other aspects are in favour of the landlord, with which we concur, we are of the view, that the special leave petition is without merit.” We leave the larger question of law open, to be decided in an appropriate case on a future occasion. “On the facts of the case we do not propose to decide the larger question as to whether the decision of ....
The then Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Ruma Pal also partly dissented with the judgment of the then Hon’ble Chief Justice Mr. B.N. Kirpal. However, Hon’ble Chief Justice Hon’ble Mr. Justice B.N. Kirpal had delivered the judgment not only for himself but also on behalf of Hon’ble Mr. Justice G.B. Pattnaik, Hon’ble Mr. Justice S. Rajendra Babu, Hon’ble Mr. Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan (present Chief Justice), and Hon’ble Mr. Justice P. Venkatarama Reddi as well as Hon’ble Mr. Justice A. Pasayat. The then Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.N. Variava (for himself and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhan) had ....
14 . The oral and documentary evidence available on record is as under: - Appendix of evidence For Plaintiff:- P.W.1 Syed Abdul Roof Quadri P.W.2 Syed Jalaluddin Quadri P.W.3 Syed Habeebullaha Quadri For Defendants D.W.1 Syed Ali Murtuza Quadri D.W.2 Syed Habibosan Quadri D.W.3 Syed Mustafa Quadri D.W.4 Mohd. Faisuddin D.W.5 Syed Ahmed Quadri @ Zubair D.W.6 Syed Durwesh Moheuddin Quadri Exhibits marked for the Plaintiff Ex.A.1/05.10.1969 Nomination in Urdu Ex.A.1/A Signature on Ex.A.1 Ex.A.2/ - Urdu News Paper cutting Ex.A.3/ - Invitation card in Urdu Ex.A.4/ - Inv....
v. Commercial Tax Officer, Company Circle, Visakhapatnam [1990] 77 STC 182, the honourable Andhra Pradesh High Court, speaking through His Lordship Syed Shah Mohammad Quadri, J., held: In law it is not only possible but also permissible that the various rights and interest may be vested in various persons. An owner of property has a bundle of rights in it, namely, right to possess, right to use and enjoy, right to usufruct, right to consume, to destroy, to alienate or transfer, etc.
Sd/- b. M. Kirpal, J sd/- syed Shah Mohammad Quadri, J"
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
