TNHB Not Conveying : Is the Cause of Action Continuing?
Purchasing a flat from the (TNHB) is a dream for many in Chennai and beyond. But what happens when the doesn't explicitly mention the undivided share (UDS) of the land? Does this omission mean TNHB has failed to convey the land interest, giving rise to a for purchasers? This is a common concern for flat owners, especially when planning reconstructions or facing title disputes.
In this post, we explore the legal position based on statutes, covenants, and key court judgments. Generally, under the (TNAOA), and related rules, the undivided interest in land and common areas is upon execution of the —even if not expressly stated. This typically eliminates any ongoing failure to convey, shifting focus to buyer protections and limitations. Let's break it down.
The Core Legal Question: ?
The question arises: not conveying to purchaser, whether the cause of action is a continuing one?
Courts have clarified that no express conveyance is needed. A Full Bench ruling emphasizes: the reading of the various provisions of the , the covenants in the ... will amply establish that the having not retained any right over the land appurtenant to the flats or common area, the question of obtaining '' from the will not arise. 2015 0 Supreme(Mad) 2543
Key takeaway: The cause of action does not continue because the UDS vests automatically with the apartment. TNHB loses control post-sale, vesting management in owners or future cooperatives. 2013 0 Supreme(Mad) 1748 2015 0 Supreme(Mad) 2543
How Sale Deeds and Laws Automatically Transfer UDS
TNHB sale deeds include covenants stating the land underlying the flats vests in a future Housing Cooperative Society: That the Vendor... agrees to vest the land on which the Building consisting of the flat... is contained to a as and when such a Society is formed by the owners of all the flats and it is hereby agreed... that such Cooperative Society shall held the land jointly on behalf of all its members to protect their rights and privileges. 2013 0 Supreme(Mad) 1748
, reinforces this: the undivided interest in the general and / or restricted common areas and facilities shall not be separated from the apartment to which it appertains and shall be or encumbered with the apartment even though such interest is not expressly mentioned or described in the conveyance or other instrument. 2013 0 Supreme(Mad) 1748 2015 0 Supreme(Mad) 2543
This statutory deeming provision means subsequent purchasers inherit full rights. TNHB retains no rights over the land, common areas, or garages/parking, which form part of the UDS. Restrictions on use by TNHB are typically void. 2013 0 Supreme(Mad) 4173
TNHB NOC: Not Required for Compliant Reconstructions
Flat owners often seek TNHB No Objection Certificates (NOCs) for demolishing and rebuilding. However, TNHB NOCs come with disclaimers: planning permission from CMDA/Corporation required; TNHB confirms no objection if within undivided share boundaries per DCR; no responsibility for allottee disputes or title issues. 2013 0 Supreme(Mad) 1748
Courts hold: as long as the construction are made within the boundary of the pertaining to the block... the will have no say over the matter. 2013 0 Supreme(Mad) 1748 Even additional units sold post-reconstruction yield no TNHB claim: Even if additional dwelling units are constructed and sold to the third parties, the cannot lay any claim over such additional construction. As long as the construction are within the parameters of the Rules of the CMDA... the have got not say. 2015 0 Supreme(Mad) 2543
Approach (CMDA) directly for approvals—comply with (DCR) and boundaries.
Protecting Bona Fide Purchasers in Disputes
Courts prioritize innocent buyers' possession. In one case, TNHB's actions contributed to title confusion, allowing 54 flat buyers to retain possession despite claims for additional flats. 2025 0 Supreme(SC) 655
TNHB, established under the Act, 1961, aims to provide housing stocks but disclaims pre-sale title disputes. Original allottees and buyers resolve privately. 2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 17868
Exceptions and Limitations: When Rights May Be Limited
While UDS is generally , caveats apply:
Acquisition Disputes: Subsequent buyers on TNHB-acquired land lack to challenge under the new if awards passed and possession taken; sales void without TNHB NOC. Principle of —verify titles beyond revenue records/CMDA permissions. 2015 0 Supreme(Mad) 433 2015 0 Supreme(Mad) 971 A decree lacking jurisdiction is a nullity; possession on acquired land unprotected. 2023 0 Supreme(Mad) 2348
Reconveyance Issues: In land acquisition cases, if land vests with TNHB post-award, original owners can't dictate usage. Re-conveyance under may apply if unutilized, but not retrospectively. 2021 0 Supreme(Mad) 3399 2019 0 Supreme(Mad) 3440 2017 0 Supreme(Mad) 3966 2015 0 Supreme(Mad) 2010 For instance, courts remand for Government decisions under where land lies vacant, but delay/ bar stale claims. doesn't revive dead litigation. 2017 0 Supreme(Mad) 3966
Boundary and Compliance: Reconstructions must stay within UDS without affecting neighbors; CMDA approval mandatory. 2013 0 Supreme(Mad) 1748
Pending payments, TNHB may hold over UDS. 2022 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 19133
Practical Recommendations for Buyers
To safeguard rights:- Form cooperative societies post-purchase to manage land/common areas.- Verify , revenue records, patta, and prior TNHB NOCs.- For reconstruction: Secure CMDA permissions; ignore TNHB if compliant.- In disputes: File civil suits or writs citing TNAOA deeming provisions—TNHB can't evict unilaterally.
TNHB letters may specify UDS extents, aiding clarity.
Conclusion: Empowerment Through Statutory Rights
Generally, TNHB's omission of express UDS conveyance doesn't create a —it's deemed transferred under law. Flat owners hold robust rights for possession, management, and reconstruction, subject to CMDA compliance and due diligence.
Key Takeaways:- UDS vests automatically via and Rule 17. 2013 0 Supreme(Mad) 1748 2015 0 Supreme(Mad) 2543- No TNHB NOC needed post-sale for boundary-compliant works.- Beware acquisition pitfalls; verify titles thoroughly.
This is general information based on reported cases and statutes, not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
References:1. 2013 0 Supreme(Mad) 1748: TNHB NOC, sale covenants, Rule 17.2. 2015 0 Supreme(Mad) 2543: Full Bench on no NOC needed.3. 2025 0 Supreme(SC) 655: Buyer possession protection.4. 2013 0 Supreme(Mad) 4173: Garages as UDS.
#TNHBRights, #UndividedShare, #TamilNaduHousingLaw