Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Checking relevance for Lalitaben Jayantilal Popat VS Pragnaben Jamnadas Kataria...
Checking relevance for Murthy VS C. Saradambal...
Checking relevance for Chinu Rani Ghosh VS Subhash Ghosh...
Checking relevance for Veena Singh (Dead) Through LR VS District Registrar/Additional Collector (F/R)...
Checking relevance for H. Venkatachala Iyengar VS B. N. Thimmajamma...
Checking relevance for R. Ratilal And Company VS National Security Assurance Company LTD. (In Liquidation)...
Checking relevance for V. A. Suryanarayanan VS Vijayalakshmi (Deceased)...
Checking relevance for Dinesh Maidasani vs State...
Checking relevance for In The Goods of : Buddhadev Bose (Dec. ) VS ABC...
Checking relevance for Pravin Laxmidas Tanna VS Kusumben A. Kakkad (Since Deceased) Harish Amrutlal Kakkad...
Checking relevance for In The Goodsof Akhiles Kumr Sinha, Deceased And Sant Agarwal VS Rabi Sinha...
Checking relevance for Sanjay Kumar Datta (deceased) VS Kamlesh Kumari Datta...
Checking relevance for Bijaylaxmi Ghosh alias Mili alias Babli Ghosh alias Mily Ghosh VS Alolika Guha...
Checking relevance for Thiruvengada Pillai VS Navaneethammal...
Checking relevance for KOMAL CHAND VS STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH...
Checking relevance for S. P. Goel VS Collector Of Stamps, Delhi...
Checking relevance for AJIT CHANDRA MAJUMDAR VS AKHIL CHANDRA MAJUMDAR...
Checking relevance for Vasudev Daulatram Sadarangani VS Sajni Prem Lalwani...
Checking relevance for Binapani Kar Chowdhury VS Satyabrata Basu...
Checking relevance for Bhagat Ram VS Suresh...
Checking relevance for Nirmul Chunder Bandopadhya VS Srimati Saratmani Debya...
1898 0 Supreme(Cal) 99 : Under Section 50 of the Indian Succession Act, the affixing of a name-stamp by a servant under the testator''''s direction is a valid execution of a will, as it amounts to the testator''''s signature. This includes the use of a stamp by a servant (or other person) acting under the testator''''s direction, even if the servant is not a close relative or family member. The law does not restrict the use of a stamp to only the testator or specific individuals; it recognizes the validity of execution when the stamp is applied by a third party (such as a servant) under the testator''''s control and direction. However, the document does not address the use of a driver specifically, nor does it discuss the use of stamp paper for executing a will—only the use of a name-stamp by a servant under direction. Therefore, while the principle of a servant''''s involvement is established, the specific role of a driver or the use of stamp paper is not addressed in this judgment.Checking relevance for REKHA VIR VS LATIKA DEY...
Checking relevance for Ramesh Chandra VS Santosh Lal...
Checking relevance for Ambikapathi and Others VS Arulmigu Nilambur Kaliamman Koil and Others...
2002 0 Supreme(Mad) 880 : The legal documents confirm that a will can be executed by a person using a stamp paper, even if the signature is affixed by another person (such as a servant or driver) in the presence and under the direction of the testator. This is supported by the case of Dasureddy Vs. M. Venkatasubbammal (AIR-1934-Madras-436), which held that it is sufficient for another person to sign the name of the testator in the testator''''s presence and by their direction. The documents further state that under Section 63(c) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and the definition of ''''attestation'''' under Section 3 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, the execution of a will by a person who cannot sign may be validly done by another person in their presence and under their direction. The use of a name stamp by a testator, directed by them, was also held to be sufficient execution under the English Wills Act, which is analogous to Indian law. Therefore, a servant or driver can execute a will on behalf of the testator if they do so in the testator’s presence and under their direction, and the will is properly attested.