Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Analysis and Conclusion:The legal consensus across the cited cases is that prolonged absence without valid justification, after proper notices and opportunities to resume duty, results in automatic termination or deemed resignation of the employee. Such employees are not entitled to benefits or wages for the period of their unauthorized absence. The key factors are the length of absence, failure to respond or justify, and the issuance of notices instructing rejoining. Therefore, an employee who voluntarily does not resume duty upon employer’s request, without valid reason, forfeits entitlement to benefits for the absence period.
In the realm of employment law, few issues spark as much debate as what happens when an employee chooses not to return to work after an employer's clear request. Imagine this scenario: an employer asks an employee to resume duties, but the employee voluntarily stays away. Am employee who voluntarily does not resume duty upon asking of employer is not entitled to any benefit of absence period. This principle, rooted in numerous court judgments, underscores that such actions are typically viewed as unauthorized absence and misconduct, leading to the loss of wages, increments, and other service benefits.
This blog post dives deep into the legal landscape, drawing from key precedents and related cases. We'll explore why voluntary non-resumption often results in forfeiture, exceptions where benefits may be preserved, and practical recommendations. Note: This is general information based on case law and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for your situation.
Courts have consistently held that when an employee voluntarily refuses to resume duty despite the employer's request, the absence is deemed unauthorized and amounts to misconduct. This leads to forfeiture of service benefits for the period in question. Benefits like wages, increments, or pension are conditional on lawful and authorized service continuity. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation VS Shyam Bihari Lal Gupta - 2005 6 Supreme 191Lajpat Rai Mehta VS Secretary to Government of Punjab, Department of Irrigation & Power, Chandigarh - 2008 0 Supreme(SC) 1861
Key points include:- Voluntary non-resumption after an employer's request is misconduct, resulting in loss of benefits.- Unauthorized absence does not entitle employees to wages or service increments.- Prolonged absence (e.g., over 150 days) may even be deemed abandonment of service. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation VS Shyam Bihari Lal Gupta - 2005 6 Supreme 191
As one ruling states: an employee who remains absent for more than 150 days without permission is deemed to have abandoned service... in terms of clause 17(b) of the Bipartite Agreement. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation VS Shyam Bihari Lal Gupta - 2005 6 Supreme 191
The foundational principle is straightforward: absence must be authorized or justified to qualify for benefits. When an employee is asked to return and refuses voluntarily, courts treat it as self-inflicted misconduct. State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Minor Irrigation Department VS Parmeshwar Nath Mishra Son of Late Devidyal Mishra - 2016 0 Supreme(Pat) 1400Delhi Transport Corporation VS Sardar Singh - 2004 6 Supreme 232
In State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Minor Irrigation Department VS Parmeshwar Nath Mishra Son of Late Devidyal Mishra - 2016 0 Supreme(Pat) 1400, the court clarified: the period which is treated as Dies Non either in-terms of SRO 321 of 1995 or SRO 514 of 1999... does not count for seniority... besides not giving the benefits. This highlights that unjustified absence forfeits not just pay but also seniority.
Similarly, Delhi Transport Corporation VS Sardar Singh - 2004 6 Supreme 232 notes: when an employee absents himself from duty without sanctioned leave for very long period, it prima facie shows lack of interest in work... unauthorized absence from duty without permission... can be considered misconduct.
A critical factor is the employer's directive to resume duty. If ignored voluntarily:- The absence is unauthorized misconduct.- No entitlement to salary or benefits during that time.
Conversely, if absence stems from the employer's illegal or arbitrary order, penalties cannot be imposed. Lajpat Rai Mehta VS Secretary to Government of Punjab, Department of Irrigation & Power, Chandigarh - 2008 0 Supreme(SC) 1861 states: an employee who is kept away from duty by an illegal or arbitrary order cannot claim benefits during that period. It clarifies that the petitioner, therefore, cannot be penalized for an act not attributable to him. But voluntary refusal flips this dynamic.
Related judgments reinforce this by addressing voluntary resignation and prolonged absence, which parallel voluntary non-resumption.
In cases involving voluntary resignation, once accepted, employees lose entitlements. For instance, Nand Keshwar Prasad VS Indian Farmers Fertilizers Co-operative LTD. - 1998 Supreme(SC) 434 details: the Labour Court dismissed the said proceedings... on the finding that the concerned employee had tendered resignation voluntarily which was acted upon by the employer and... the said employee was also not entitled to any relief. The court upheld that resignation could not be withdrawn post-effectiveness, barring the employee from duty and benefits. Nand Keshwar Prasad v. M/s. Indian Farmers Fertilizers Cooperative Ltd. and Others - 1998 Supreme(Online)(SC) 66Nand Keshwar Prasad v. M/s. Indian Farmers Fertilizers Cooperative Ltd. and Others - 1998 Supreme(Online)(SC) 164
Prolonged absence often equates to abandonment. SHRI VIJAY KUMAR NARANG vs UNION BANK OF INDIA & ORS and SHRI VIJAY KUMAR NARANG vs UNION BANK OF INDIA & ORS-5206_2002) affirm: notice to join is sufficient compliance... when the employee fails to re-join and does not have/give valid justification... absence... for a very long period, it may amount to voluntarily abandonment of service.
Jaswinder Singh VS Regional Manager, Punjab National Bank, Karnal - 2010 Supreme(P&H) 761 adds: Unless the employee reports for duty within 30 days of the notice... the employee will be deemed to... This shows time-bound notices solidify abandonment claims.
Even in reinstatement scenarios, back wages are denied for voluntary gaps. SAMBHUNATH DAS VS AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA - 2003 Supreme(Cal) 400 discusses Regulation 31 of Leave Regulations, 1983: Unauthorised absence... would also constitute a break in service, entailing forfeiture of past service, unless... condoned.
Not all absences lead to forfeiture. Courts protect employees in these scenarios:- Employer fault: If absence results from illegal orders, it's treated as 'on duty.' Mohd. Ashraf Khan VS Union Of India - 2013 Supreme(J&K) 632 holds: An employee's absence from duty, forced by an arbitrary and illegal order, should be treated as on duty, and the employee is entitled to service benefits.- Sanctioned or justified leave: Duly approved periods count fully.- No work, no pay exceptions: Delays attributable to employer may entitle salary, overriding 'no work no pay.' Bharat Coking Coal Limited through its Managing Director VS Bhupendra Singh - 2019 Supreme(Jhk) 1203 notes systematic delays by appellants entitle pay.- Prevented from working: Bholanath Roy VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL - 2010 Supreme(Cal) 315 clarifies no leave application is needed if employer prevents duty: NO REQUIREMENT... THAT A STAFF... PREVENTED BY HIS EMPLOYER... HAS TO APPLY FOR... LEAVE... TO BE ENTITLED TO PECUNIARY BENEFITS.
Kirpal Singh VS Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandak Committee - 2007 Supreme(P&H) 1749 balances: Absence from duty shall not be construed as break in service... However, he will not be entitled to monetary benefit for the period of absence.
Generally, an employee who voluntarily does not resume duty upon the employer's request forfeits benefits for that absence period, as it's deemed misconduct and unauthorized. Precedents like Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation VS Shyam Bihari Lal Gupta - 2005 6 Supreme 191, Lajpat Rai Mehta VS Secretary to Government of Punjab, Department of Irrigation & Power, Chandigarh - 2008 0 Supreme(SC) 1861, State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Minor Irrigation Department VS Parmeshwar Nath Mishra Son of Late Devidyal Mishra - 2016 0 Supreme(Pat) 1400, and Delhi Transport Corporation VS Sardar Singh - 2004 6 Supreme 232 solidify this, while related cases on resignation and abandonment echo the theme. Exceptions arise when employer actions force the absence, potentially restoring entitlements. Mohd. Ashraf Khan VS Union Of India - 2013 Supreme(J&K) 632
Key Takeaways:- Voluntary refusal = misconduct → no benefits.- Employer fault = possible full benefits.- Document everything to protect rights.
Stay informed on labor laws to navigate these complexities. For tailored advice, consult a legal professional.
References: Listed case IDs throughout draw from judicial documents on employment disputes in India.
#LaborLaw, #EmployeeRights, #UnauthorizedAbsence
Absence from duty in the beginning may be a misconduct but when absence is for a very long period, it may amount to voluntarily abandonment of service and in that eventuality, the bonds of service come to an end automatically without requiring any order to be passed by the employer.” ... It is a settled law that an employee cannot be termed as a slave, he has a right to abandon the service any time voluntarily by submitting his resignation and alter....
By the Award dated 12-6-1985 the Labour Court dismissed the said proceedings inter alia on the finding that the concerned employee had tendered resignation voluntarily which was acted upon by the employer and it was appropriate and legal not to take the said employee on duty by the employer and the said ... employee was also not entitled to any relief. ... Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for decisio....
By the Award dated 12-6-1985 the Labour Court dismissed the said proceedings inter alia on the finding that the concerned employee had tendered resignation voluntarily which was acted upon by the employer and it was appropriate and legal not to take the said employee on duty by the employer and the said ... employee was also not entitled to any relief. ... Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for decisio....
By the Award dated 12-6-1985 the Labour Court dismissed the said proceedings inter alia on the finding that the concerned employee had tendered resignation voluntarily which was acted upon by the employer and it was appropriate and legal not to take the said employee on duty by the employer and the said ... employee was also not entitled to any relief. ... Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for decisio....
for the entire period of absence from duty. ... And Others (2013) 10 SCC 253 held that once a person does not report for duty for a long time and does not join his duty accordingly, then the initial stage absence from duty can be misconduct but when the absence is for a long period this absence for a long period amounts to ... Absence from #HL_....
The workman defaulted and offered no explanation of his absence from duty and did not report for duty within the stipulated period of the notice as required in clause 16 of the Standing Order. 16. ... On perusal of the copy of Registered A.D. cover letter dated July 16, 1992, it is clean that the workman was called upon to resume his duty immediately on or before July 23, 1992 along with written explanation as to why disciplinary action should #HL_ST....
The workman defaulted and offered no explanation of his absence from duty and did not report for duty within the stipulated period of the notice as required in clause 16 of the Standing Order. ... Its Workmen, AIR 1961 SC 1567, the Apex Court held as under: (At pp. 1369-70) "..............if an employee continues to be absent from duty without obtaining leave and in an unauthorised manner for such a long period of time that an inference may reasonabl....
notice to join is sufficient compliance of the principles of natural justice when the employee fails to re-join and does not have/give valid justification for the entire period of absence from duty. ... Absence from duty in the beginning may be a misconduct but when absence is for a very long period, it may amount to voluntarily abandonment of service and in that eventuality, the bonds of service come to ....
notice to join is sufficient compliance of the principles of natural justice when the employee fails to re-join and does not have/give valid justification for the entire period of absence from duty. ... Absence from duty in the beginning may be a misconduct but when absence is for a very long period, it may amount to voluntarily abandonment of service and in that eventuality, the bonds of service come to ....
from duty was not authorised and he was advised to resume duty immediately. ... Unless the employee reports for duty within 30 days of the notice or gives an explanation for his absence within the said period of 30 days satisfying the management that he has not taken up another employment or avocation and he has no intention of not joining duties, the employee will be deemed to ... entit....
The writ petitioner moved this Court by filing the writ petition with a prayer for release of his salary with effect from January, 2012 to June, 2012, i.e., for the period he was waiting for his joining in anticipation of approval of the competent authority. It has further been disclosed in the letter that his case was forwarded to competent authority, who, after examining the full details and documents, had allowed him to resume duty subject to medical fitness vide letter dated 06.04.2012. However, it is also stated that he will not be entitled to any wages or any other benefit fo....
In such a case if the government employee is allowed to resume the duty, the authority permitting him to resume the duty may regularize his period of unauthorized absence as "extra-ordinary leave" without any pay and allowance on the principle of "no work no pay". In such a case absence would be attributable to the government employee. Cases can be visualized where a government employee unauthorisedly absents himself from duty or over-stays on leave duly sanctioned in his favour. Even if such an employee had sufficient ground to stay away from his duty, the competent author....
The other submission that without regularisation of the period of absence of the petitioner from duty by the Board he is not entitled to any benefit for such period is a further illustration of the schools apathy and indifference towards a teacher who, for reasons beyond his control, could not resume duty. No departmental action having been taken, the matter must be allowed to rest. The Leave Rules, in a case of the present nature, cannot stand in the way of granting relief to the petitioner. Leave of any of the kinds mentioned therein must be obtained by a staff who intend....
This writ petition accordingly succeeds with above directions. The absence from duty shall not be construed as break in service. But this period will be counted towards the service. However, he will not be entitled to monetary benefit for the period of absence upto the date of rejoining the duty.
( 12 ) REGULATION 31 of the Leave Regulations, 1983 is the relevant regulation, which the authority admittedly relied on while giving the impugned decision dated 14th May 2002. Unauthorised absence of this kind, apart from resulting in loss of pay and allowance for the period of such absence would also constitute a break in service, entailing forfeiture of past service, unless the break itself is condoned and treated as dies-non. If the break is condoned and treated as dies-non by the competent authority, the service rendered prior to unauthorised absence will counted for all purpose, but th....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
