Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Lis Pendens - A legal doctrine that applies when a suit concerning a property is pending before a court. It ensures that any transfer or litigation related to the property during the pendency is subject to the outcome of the suit. The doctrine prevents the transfer of rights that could affect the pending case and binds transferees who have notice of the suit ["Savitri Devi VS Civil Judge Junior Division Court No. 22 Barabanki - Allahabad"].
Application Scope - The doctrine applies only when a suit is actively pending before a court. Transferees or purchasers who acquire rights during the pendency are not automatically entitled to be parties but may be added at the court's discretion to prevent multiplicity of suits ["Savitri Devi VS Civil Judge Junior Division Court No. 22 Barabanki - Allahabad"].
Registration of Lis Pendens - Recording a lis pendens in revenue or land records is crucial for its effect. Registration provides notice to third parties and makes the doctrine applicable to transactions post-registration. Courts have directed authorities to verify and record lis pendens to uphold legal rights and prevent illegal transfers ["CHHAGANBHAI UKABHAI VEKARIYA vs STATE OF GUJARAT - Gujarat"], ["MADHUBHAI VIRJIBHAI DHANANI (PATEL) vs STATE OF GUJARAT - Gujarat"].
Legal Effect and Binding Nature - Orders passed during pending suits are binding on persons with notice of the lis pendens, and subsequent transfers or transactions can be invalidated if they conflict with the pending litigation. The doctrine also applies to transactions like GPA or sale made during pendency, rendering such transactions non-est or hit by lis pendens if they occur after suit initiation ["Chakka Mahalakshamma vs TALLURI SAVIRTRAMMA (DIED) - Andhra Pradesh"].
Exceptions and Limitations - The doctrine does not apply in cases of collusive transactions or where transfers are made without notice or are not connected to the pending suit. For instance, collusive sales or transfers made prior to the suit are not affected by lis pendens ["Darbara Singh (since deceased) through his LRs VS Jarnail Singh - Punjab and Haryana"].
Legal Proceedings and Court Orders - Courts have emphasized the importance of registering lis pendens and have directed authorities to record such notices to ensure the rights of parties are protected. Orders regarding lis pendens are binding and can be upheld or challenged through appropriate writs if wrongful denial occurs ["YOGENDRASINH JAYENDRASINH JADEJA vs STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS. - Gujarat"], ["JAYANTI MOHANTA vs SIBA CHARAN MOHANTA - Orissa"].
Judicial Discretion - Courts have discretion to add transferees or purchasers as parties to pending suits to prevent multiplicity and ensure proper adjudication. The presence of lis pendens purchasers is often deemed necessary for just resolution of disputes ["RABINDRA KUMAR PANDA vs ANUSAYA SAHOO - Orissa"], ["JAYANTI MOHANTA vs SIBA CHARAN MOHANTA - Orissa"].
Lis Pendens is a vital legal principle that safeguards pending litigation by preventing transfers or dealings with the property that could undermine the court's judgment. Its effectiveness hinges on proper registration and notice, and courts have consistently held that it binds subsequent transferees who have knowledge of the pending suit. While exceptions exist, the doctrine promotes judicial integrity and certainty in property rights during litigation. Proper registration and judicial orders are essential to uphold the doctrine's protections ["Savitri Devi VS Civil Judge Junior Division Court No. 22 Barabanki - Allahabad"], ["CHHAGANBHAI UKABHAI VEKARIYA vs STATE OF GUJARAT - Gujarat"].
In the complex world of real estate transactions, few concepts can catch buyers off guard like lis pendens. If you've ever wondered, What is lis pendens?, you're not alone. This Latin term, meaning pending litigation, is a crucial doctrine that impacts property deals when a lawsuit is ongoing. Understanding it can save you from costly surprises.
This guide breaks down the doctrine of lis pendens, its statutory basis under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (TPA), and real-world implications. We'll explore its purpose, application, judicial interpretations, and practical tips—drawing from key legal precedents. Note: This is general information, not legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your specific situation.
Lis pendens refers to the existence of a pending suit or legal proceeding concerning specific property or rights. During this time, no new or inconsistent dealings or transfers affecting the subject matter should occur, as they remain subject to the litigation's final outcome. Celir LLP VS Sumati Prasad Bafna - 2024 0 Supreme(SC) 1187
It is a doctrine that limits parties from making changes or transfers to property involved in a pending suit. Celir LLP VS Sumati Prasad Bafna - 2024 0 Supreme(SC) 1187 The core idea? Preserve the status quo to ensure the court's judgment isn't undermined by side deals. Thomson Press (India) Ltd. VS Nanak Builders & Investors P. Ltd. - 2013 0 Supreme(SC) 185
Derived from Latin for pending suit, lis pendens prevents the frustration of judicial proceedings by subsequent transactions. As noted in classic equity principles, permitting alienations during litigation would defeat the very purpose of judicial proceedings. Celir LLP VS Sumati Prasad Bafna - 2024 0 Supreme(SC) 1187
The doctrine finds explicit statutory footing in Section 52 of the TPA, which bars transfers or dealings with immovable property during the pendency of a suit involving that property—unless court-authorized. Thomson Press (India) Ltd. VS Nanak Builders & Investors P. Ltd. - 2013 0 Supreme(SC) 185Siddamsetty Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. VS Katta Sujatha Reddy - 2024 8 Supreme 321
Key elements from the section:- Applies to suits or proceedings where a right to immovable property is directly and specifically in question.- Pendency starts from the suit's institution date and lasts until final disposal.- Transfers aren't voided outright but become subordinate to the decree's rights. Celir LLP VS Sumati Prasad Bafna - 2024 0 Supreme(SC) 1187
This embodies principles of equity, justice, and public policy, safeguarding litigation integrity. Celir LLP VS Sumati Prasad Bafna - 2024 0 Supreme(SC) 1187
The primary goal is to prevent property alienation that could render a court's judgment ineffective. Lord Turner in Bellamy v. Sabine warned that without it, defendants could sell off assets pre-judgment, mocking justice. Celir LLP VS Sumati Prasad Bafna - 2024 0 Supreme(SC) 1187
In essence:- Preserves parties' rights during litigation.- Maintains status quo to avoid circumvention of court jurisdiction.- Ensures transferees (buyers during pendency) are bound by the outcome, even if unaware. Thomson Press (India) Ltd. VS Nanak Builders & Investors P. Ltd. - 2013 0 Supreme(SC) 185
For lis pendens to kick in, several conditions must align:- A pending suit or proceeding in a court of competent jurisdiction. Thomson Press (India) Ltd. VS Nanak Builders & Investors P. Ltd. - 2013 0 Supreme(SC) 185- Involves rights to immovable property directly and specifically. Celir LLP VS Sumati Prasad Bafna - 2024 0 Supreme(SC) 1187- Transfer or dealing happens during the suit's active prosecution. Celir LLP VS Sumati Prasad Bafna - 2024 0 Supreme(SC) 1187- The dealing affects rights under the eventual decree. Celir LLP VS Sumati Prasad Bafna - 2024 0 Supreme(SC) 1187
Importantly, it doesn't apply if the court lacks jurisdiction—transfers then may escape its shadow. Rajender Singh VS Santa Singh - 1973 0 Supreme(SC) 247T. Ravi VS B. Chinna Narasimha - 2017 3 Supreme 267
Indian courts, especially the Supreme Court, have shaped lis pendens through landmark rulings. In Jayaram Mudaliar and Rajender Singh, it was clarified that the doctrine prevents private dealings from evading court authority, binding even unaware transferees. Celir LLP VS Sumati Prasad Bafna - 2024 0 Supreme(SC) 1187
From other precedents:- Transfers pendente lite aren't automatically void; the decree merely binds the buyer. In Amit Kumar Shaw vs. Farida Khatoon (2005) 11 SCC 403, the Supreme Court held: the sale deed in favour of the petitioner does not automatically become void or illegal but the decree passed in the lis may be binding on the petitioner. Shrikrushna Narayan Tupkari VS Mahadeo - 2014 Supreme(Bom) 530- Lis pendens purchasers aren't always necessary parties but may be impleaded for equity. Courts have discretion under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. Pradeep Kumar Mohanty VS Bana Behari Mohanty - 2012 Supreme(Ori) 109JAYANTI MOHANTA vs SIBA CHARAN MOHANTA- In specific performance suits, subsequent sales aren't hit by lis pendens if the prior agreement is forged, as in a case where the court upheld a later sale deed as valid, legal and effective and not affected. Saroj Sinha W/O Late Ramchandra Prasad Sinha VS Sharangdhar Prasad S/O Late Krishna Prasad - 2016 Supreme(Pat) 693- Effect on possession claims: Even permissive possession can't ripen into adverse possession under lis pendens; transfers remain subservient to litigants' rights. Sarita Gopalkumar Chand VS Madgu s/o Sitaram Ramteke - 2010 Supreme(Bom) 958
These rulings underscore: lis pendens subordinates, doesn't annul, conveyances. Sarita Gopalkumar Chand VS Madgu s/o Sitaram Ramteke - 2010 Supreme(Bom) 958
Not a blanket rule:- No competent jurisdiction? Doctrine may not apply. Rajender Singh VS Santa Singh - 1973 0 Supreme(SC) 247- Movable property or indirect rights? Outside scope.- Court-approved transfers? Permitted.- Post-decree dealings? Unaffected.
In RERA contexts, lis pendens before superior courts doesn't always halt authority orders. Complaint No.RAJ-RERA-C-N-2018-2113 Rajesh Gupta VS Parth Infratech Ltd Satyanarayan Gupta Smt. Shushila Devi
Buyers can sometimes implead themselves to protect interests, especially if deceived without notice. Shrikrushna Narayan Tupkari VS Mahadeo - 2014 Supreme(Bom) 530
If buying property:- Check for pending suits via title search and encumbrance certificates.- Register lis pendens notices where possible for protection. MRUDULABEN KANTILAL SHAH VS RAMTUJI BECHARJI DECEASED THROUGH HIS HEIR - 2021 Supreme(Guj) 534- Seek court nod for transfers amid litigation.
Sellers: Avoid deals during suits to prevent subordination risks.
Transferees: Even bona fide buyers without notice are bound—highlighting due diligence's importance. Shrikrushna Narayan Tupkari VS Mahadeo - 2014 Supreme(Bom) 530
Recommendations:- Always verify litigation status before deals.- Consult lawyers for impleadment or approvals.- Courts: Confirm jurisdiction pre-transfer permissions.
In summary, lis pendens ensures justice isn't sold away mid-trial. Stay informed, perform thorough checks, and navigate property law wisely. For tailored advice, reach out to a legal expert.
References:1. Celir LLP VS Sumati Prasad Bafna - 2024 0 Supreme(SC) 1187: Core concept, origin, purpose.2. Thomson Press (India) Ltd. VS Nanak Builders & Investors P. Ltd. - 2013 0 Supreme(SC) 185: Section 52 TPA details, conditions.
#LisPendens, #PropertyLawIndia, #Section52TPA
Farida Khatoon and Another, AIR 2005 SC 2209, it has been observed by the Apex Court that the doctrine of lis pendense applies only where the lis is pending before a Court. ... and a decree or order obtained by him would be binding on the lis pendense transferee, when a motion is made by the lis pendents transferee to be impleaded as party, the Court may, in exercise of its discretion judicially, add him as a proper party to prevent multiplicity of suits. ... Pravat Chandra Chatterjee ....
The learned counsel submits that by the impugned order, the respondent No.3 has refused to record the lis- pendense in the revenue record on the ground that the petitioner has to obtain an order of the competent judicial court. ... The learned counsel submits that subsequently, the petitioner got lis- pendense of the pending Civil Suit registered with the Sub-Registrar OfÏce, Mava Rajkot-5 vide registration No.3290 dated 05.05.2025 in respect of the subject land. ... Talati – Nanamava - 2 - vashi passed by respondent no.....
He further submits that lis pendense purchasers are as reported in 104 (2007) CLT 756, submits that lis ... the suit, it will be governed by the principles of lis ... application under Order 1 Rule 10 C.P.C. to implead lis
Once the lis pendense is registered the order passed by this Court in the present proceedings shall be binding to the person concerned. So as to enable the applicant/appellant to get the lis pendense registered, the ad-interim relief granted earlier can be continued for some time. ... However, considering the facts and circumstances, since the appeal has been admitted, the principles of lis pendense should apply. ... Hence, so as to enable the applicant to get the lis....
Further, the alleged GPA-cum-sale is subsequent to the suit and therefore, it is hit by the doctrine of lis pendense. The alleged GPA is non est in the eye of law. ... Coming to the facts of the present case, merely because, a transaction regarding the suit schedule property is held by two parties, it cannot be termed lis pendense as neither of the parties to the said transaction is a party to the suit. ... On merits and by the order impugned, the trial Court dismissed the petition observing that the document is hit by t....
Attar Singh, 1984 RLR 196 in support of the contention that where the decree was collusive that doctrine of lis pendense will not be applicable. The entire discussion is there in para No.8 of the judgment by learned Addl. District Judge, Faridkot. ... With regard to the plea of lis pendens taken as plaintiffs had purchased the land in suit during pendency of the appeal. ... The trial Court in para No.10 of the judgment has rightly come to the conclusion that Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act dealing with doctrine of lis....
of certiorari or any other appropriate writ order or direction for quashing and setting aside the impugned order/communication dtd.19.05.2025 bearing no.E- dhara/e-post/222110/25 passed by respondent no.3 authority (Annexure “A”) refusing to record an entry in the records of rights of the registered lis-pendense ... in respect of subject property as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust, contrary to the settled legal position as also violative of Art. 14 of Constitution of India; (B) YOUR LORDSHIPS be pleased to direct respondent no.3 to forthwith reconsider/re....
Learned Advocate on behalf of promoter prayed to adjourn further and to wait till further directions issued by the Hon’ble REAT in the appeal proceedings having lis pendense before the Authority. ... Therfore, in view of the authoritative pronouncement by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, despite having lis pendense before the Superior Court, we are of the view that a direction for compliance of the order issued by the Authority appears to be justified as no Page 4 of S Comp.
Learned trial Court taking note of the rival contentions of the parties including that of Defendant No.6-Petitioner came to hold that presence of lis pendense purchasers is necessary for just adjudication of the suit. ... There is no mention about the lis pendens alienation in the respective pleadings of the parties. ... Misra, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that while adjudicating the matter, learned trial Court held that the lis pendens purchasers are impleaded as assignees of Defendant No.1 under represen....
order dated 28th March, 2022 upholding the impleation of lis ... filed by pendense
9. This Court issued notice on 08.02.2010 and later, on 27.01.2011 issued the Rule and expedited the matter. It also permitted the petitioner register lis-pendense before the revenue authorities.
2 is right, valid and legal or hit by lis pendense. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for decree of specific performance of contract ?
The doctrine of lis pendense applies only where the lis is pending before a Court. In Amit Kumar Shaw vs. Farida Khatoon :(2005) 11 SCC 403, two judges of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in para 16 observed thus, “16. Further pending the suit, the transferee is not entitled as of right to be made a party to the suit, though the Court has a discretion to make him a party. Act the sale deed in favour of the petitioner does not automatically become void or illegal but the decree passed in the lis may be binding on the petitioner. But then the rights of the person like the petitioner....
Act, held that a lis pendense purchaser is neither a necessary nor proper party. Similar view was expressed in the case of Sanjay Verma (supra). In the case of Sarvinder Singh (supra) the apex Court, applying the principle of lis pendens as envisaged in Section 52, T.P.
The trial Court also failed to notice that the claim of adverse possession in a pending proceeding on the date of the institution of the suit was based upon permissive possession which can never be termed as adverse possession. Even otherwise, the effect of lis pendense is not to annul the conveyance but only to make it subservient to rights of the parties to litigation. The evidence of the plaintiff and her witnesses in the trial Court went unchallenged as the suit had proceeded further exparte against the defendants. Under these circumstances, possession ought to have fol....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
