The question of whether the attestation of a gift deed amounts to estoppel has been addressed in various legal precedents. The prevailing view is that mere attestation does not create estoppel or imply consent regarding the contents of the deed.
In the case of Pandurang Krishnaji, it was held that attestation does not prevent a person from denying knowledge of the contents of the document, nor does it imply consent to the transaction Nishant Agrawal S/o Ved Prakash Agrawal VS State of Chhattisgarh - Chhattisgarh (2021).
Conditions for Estoppel:
For estoppel by representation to apply, specific conditions must be satisfied, including a representation made by one party that another relies upon to their detriment. If the party claiming estoppel was aware of the true state of affairs, estoppel cannot be invoked B. M. Fathima Bibi VS Idris Mohammed - Madras (1997).
Role of Attesting Witnesses:
Attesting witnesses are required to have seen the execution of the deed and signed it in the presence of the executant. However, their mere presence does not bind them to the contents of the deed or create an interest in the property GHANSILAL VS BHURIDEVI - Rajasthan (2063).
Judicial Precedents:
The attestation of a gift deed does not amount to estoppel. It serves primarily as a formal requirement to validate the execution of the deed but does not imply consent to its contents or prevent a party from contesting the deed''s validity. Legal practitioners should ensure that the conditions for estoppel are clearly established if they intend to rely on it in disputes involving gift deeds.
References: - Nishant Agrawal S/o Ved Prakash Agrawal VS State of Chhattisgarh - Chhattisgarh (2021) - B. M. Fathima Bibi VS Idris Mohammed - Madras (1997) - GHANSILAL VS BHURIDEVI - Rajasthan (2063)]
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact
Us for assistance
Scan Me!