Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Checking relevance for Government Of T. N. VS Vasantha Bai...
1995 0 Supreme(SC) 521 : The court held that the mere pendency of a writ appeal does not prohibit proceedings in the writ petition unless a stay is specifically granted by the Division Bench. It emphasized that until the writ petitions are disposed of or appeals are concluded, a stay of dispossession remains in operation, but this does not prevent the publication of a declaration under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, pending adjudication of the legality of the notification. The court further noted that publishing the declaration during this period serves a useful purpose and would not amount to ''''undue haste'''' or ''''overreaching the judicial process'''' if no specific direction prohibits it. Therefore, the pendency of the appeal alone does not bar proceedings, provided no stay has been granted.Checking relevance for Project Officer, Singareni Colleries Company VS B. Komaraiah...
2001 5 Supreme 806 : The judgment clarifies that the mere pendency of a writ appeal does not prohibit proceedings in the writ petition unless a stay is granted by the Division Bench. The court held that when the writ petition was pending and the claimants had appealed against the interim stay order, it was not appropriate for the High Court to pass an order as impugned (requiring deposit of compensation) without first hearing the writ petition and the appeal together. The court emphasized that the appropriate course was to consolidate and hear both matters jointly, and that until the writ petition was decided, no effective order could be made regarding payment of compensation. This confirms that the pendency of a writ appeal does not automatically bar proceedings in the original writ petition, provided no stay has been granted by the Division Bench.Checking relevance for Nagesh Datta Shetti VS State of Karnataka...
2005 1 Supreme 764 : In given cases the Court/Forum to which the matter is remitted can await decision in the appeal where the directions given are impugned. Mere pendency of a writ appeal does not prohibit proceedings in the matter unless a stay is granted by the Division Bench in the writ appeal. The Tribunal''''s action based on the Single Judge''''s direction was subject to the outcome of the writ appeal, and the Division Bench erred in holding the appeal infructuous merely because the Tribunal proceeded after the appeal was admitted but without a stay order.Checking relevance for Reliance Industries Limited VS Vijayan A (Authorised Representative Of Securities And Exchange Board Of India)...
2022 0 Supreme(SC) 1737 : The pendency of an appeal and/or writ petition along with stay cannot be equated with pendency of the review petition. The pendency of a stay application in a review petition cannot be a ground to grant stay by the respondent on its own and not to comply with the directions issued by the Court.Checking relevance for Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency P. Ltd. VS Central Bureau of Investigation...
2022 5 Supreme 741 : Mere pendency of a writ appeal does not prohibit proceedings in the writ petition unless a stay is granted by the Division Bench in the writ appeal. The order of stay granted by the Division Bench in the High Court cannot be treated as having no force, indicating that without such a stay, proceedings in the writ petition may continue.
