Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Main Points and Insights:
Judicial Proceedings and Case Summaries:
Several judgments mention Yashpal Jain's involvement in criminal cases, including allegations related to ransom and abduction, with detailed accounts of his actions, such as receiving and handing over currency notes (Yashpal Jain... handed over a bag containing Rs.10,00,000/-) ["Vinod VS State of Haryana - Crimes"], and being part of investigations ["RENU K. BHATIA vs KISHAN LOUNGANI - Bombay"].
Legal Principles and Court Observations:
In property and rent-related cases, courts have scrutinized evidence regarding tenancy and rent payments, with Yashpal Jain acting as a legal representative or witness ["RENU K. BHATIA vs KISHAN LOUNGANI - Bombay"], ["RENU K. BHATIA vs KISHAN LOUNGANI - Bombay"].
Expert Testimonies and Evidence:
The courts have considered these expert reports critically, especially when discrepancies or procedural issues are highlighted.
Insights into Yashpal Jain's Role:
His involvement often centers around the collection of evidence, expert testimony, and procedural compliance.
Analysis and Conclusion:Yashpal Jain's legal history reflects a multifaceted role as both a litigant and an expert, with significant involvement in criminal and civil proceedings. The courts have emphasized adherence to procedural laws, especially in summary trials and special laws, citing the Supreme Court's judgments. His participation as an expert in handwriting and fingerprint analysis has been pivotal in several cases, while his role in criminal cases related to ransom and abduction indicates his complex legal and possibly criminal associations. Overall, the judgments underscore the importance of procedural correctness, credible evidence, and the weight of expert testimony in judicial decision-making involving Yashpal Jain ["LALITKUMAR MANGILAL JAIN vs MAHENDRAKUMAR JEETMAL JAIN ALIAS MAHENDRAKUMAR JEETMAL DHAKAD - Bombay"] ["RENU K. BHATIA vs KISHAN LOUNGANI - Bombay"] ["Satadru Biswas vs State of Telangana - Telangana"].
References:- ["LALITKUMAR MANGILAL JAIN vs MAHENDRAKUMAR JEETMAL JAIN ALIAS MAHENDRAKUMAR JEETMAL DHAKAD - Bombay"]- ["RENU K. BHATIA vs KISHAN LOUNGANI - Bombay"]- ["Yashpal Bharti Vs. The State Of Bihar - Patna"]- ["Satadru Biswas vs State of Telangana - Telangana"]- ["J.D. Jain vs Saraswati Devi - Delhi"]- ["RENU K. BHATIA vs KISHAN LOUNGANI - Bombay"]- ["RENU K. BHATIA vs KISHAN LOUNGANI - Bombay"]- ["RENU K. BHATIA vs KISHAN LOUNGANI - Bombay"]- ["RENU K. BHATIA vs KISHAN LOUNGANI - Bombay"]- ["Vinod VS State of Haryana - Crimes"]- ["RENU K. BHATIA vs KISHAN LOUNGANI - Bombay"]- ["RENU K. BHATIA vs KISHAN LOUNGANI - Bombay"]- ["RENU K. BHATIA vs KISHAN LOUNGANI - Bombay"]- ["Vinod VS State of Haryana - Supreme Court"]- ["RENU K. BHATIA vs KISHAN LOUNGANI - Bombay"]
In the Indian judicial system, delays can turn justice into a distant dream. Imagine a civil suit lingering for 41 years due to disputes over who should represent a deceased plaintiff's estate. This is the stark reality highlighted in the Yashpal Jain judgment, a case that serves as a cautionary tale for litigants and courts alike. If you're searching for a Yashpal Jain judgment summary, this post breaks down the core issues, focusing on the critical distinction between 'legal heir' and 'legal representative' under the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC).
The judgment sharply critiques procedural missteps that exacerbate delays, emphasizing efficient estate representation. Drawing from the primary source [
#YashpalJainCase, #CPCLegalRep, #JudicialDelay
Jain, for Plaintiff. ... SUIT NO.1414 OF 2005 IN --- Mr.Yashpal ... Mahendrakumar Jeetmal Jain alias
Yashpal Jain for defendant Summons for Judgment ... 2004 in Summary ... Summary
It has been contended that the petitioner no. 1 Yashpal Bharti has dis- entitled Shrey Bharti, the husband of the O.P. ... JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 10-02-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. ... that the petitioner Yashpal Bharti and his family may provide a temporary residence accommodation matching to their status in society till further event as a temporary measure. ... It has been submitted that the petitioner no. 1 Yashpal Bharti is an old person and is suffering from various ai....
This robotic grant to adjournments, according to petitioners, is contrary to the law laid down in 1988 Act and also the directions of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Yashpal Jain vs. Sushila Devi. ... It is brought to the notice of this Court the judgment in Yashpal Jain’s case (supra), wherein the Hon'ble Apex Court held that the procedure laid down in special law will prevail over general law. ... , stipulating or contemplating summary procedure for deciding issues before 1st respondent. ... The s....
In another judgment in Sultan Singh v. Jai Chand Jain, 1966(2) DLT 624 Mehar Singh J. held that Prem Chand was self-supporting and in a position to set up a separate residence. It was held that son should be dropped from considerations. ... In his statement before issues, the tenant Shri J.B.Jain, stated as follows: "On the first floor only Yashpal Mahna, his wife and two daughters are living. The other son of the petitioner Rajesh Mahna does not live on the first floor along with his family. ... JUDGMENT#HL_....
Yashpal Chand Jain despite the witness being cross examined by another expert engaged by the appellant, he got a report from Sh. ... Yashpal Chand Jain, Handwriting and Finger Prints expert but failed to appreciate that Sh. V.B.Bhatnagar, another expert examined by the appellant on the basis of report Ex. ... Yashpal Chand Jain was cross examined at length with the assistance of Sh. Shamsher Singh, Handwriting and Finger Prints Expert engaged by appellant-defendant No. 1.....
Smt.Sangita Jain & Others Vs. ... This fact was deposed by Swarup Chand Jain, and Hari Shankar Gupta. ... Yashpal Garg, the learned counsel for the respondent, has strenuously argued that the petitioner No.1 was as under :- The validity of the marriage for the purpose of summary
Shri Yashpal Jain for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2. ... Shri Yashpal Jain for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2. ... Heard Mr.Parvez Ubharay i/b Mr.Dubey the learned counsel for the applicant and Mr.Yashpal Jain the ... Heard Mr.Parvez Ubharay i/b Mr.Dubey the learned counsel for the appellant and Mr.Yashpal Jain the
Jain and Anr. ... Yashpal Jhala for accused respondent This Criminal Revision Petition under remit the matter to the learned trial court at Jaipur Bench Jaipur Judgment
Jain and Anr. ... Yashpal Jhala for accused respondent This Criminal Revision Petition under remit the matter to the learned trial court at Jaipur Bench Jaipur Judgment
Section 6 of the said Act empowered the State to incorporate and establish a University by issuing a Notification in the gazette; while Section 6 permitted such University to affiliate any College or Institution or to set up more than one campus with the prior approval of the State Government. Yashpal, which led to the judgment Prof. Yashpal (supra). Mushrooming of various Institutions as well as the Universities without any regard to the quality and standards of teaching and education in various parts of the country, particularly in the State of Chhattisgarh was the subjec....
Paragraph 76 of the judgment in R.K.Jain (supra) reads thus: Before parting with the case it is necessary to express our anguish over the ineffectivity of the alternative mechanism devised for judicial reviews. It was also observed in the said case, in the context of the disputes to be resolved by the Administrative Tribunal, that an appeal to a bench of two Judges of the respective High Court over the orders of the Tribunal within its territorial jurisdiction on questions of law would assuage the growing feeling of injustice of those who can ill afford to approach the Supr....
This interlocutory application has been filed for amendment of the prayer portion in the main writ petition by adding the following relief - (i) For quashing of letter no. JUDGMENT : Mr. Vikash Jain, J. - I.A. No. 4556 of 2017 1233 dated 08.04.2015 issued by the Collector with direction to stop the work completely.
Let the defects as pointed out by the office be ignored. JUDGMENT : Vikash Jain, J. Perused the office notes.
JUDGMENT Ramendra Jain, J.—Briefly stated, Respondent nos. 2 and 3 (for short “borrowers”) obtained cash credit limit facility of Rs. 10 lakh from the petitioner-bank in the year 2008 against execution of various documents like demand promissory note, consent letter, acknowledgement letter, agreement of guarantee etc. in favour of the petitioner-bank. Since borrowers could not adhere to the financial discipline, their cash credit facility account was declared Non Performing Asset (“NPA”) on 27.1.2010.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
