Jammu Court Orders Preliminary Inquiry Into BCCI President Mithun Manhas' Date of Birth Allegations

In a significant development, the Sub-Judge/Special Railway Magistrate, Jammu, has directed the Jammu and Kashmir Police to conduct a preliminary inquiry into allegations of date of birth forgery against BCCI President Mithun Manhas. The order, passed by Mr. Sandeep Singh Sen, KCS (Judicial) , stops short of ordering an immediate FIR registration, instead requiring a police probe before any cognizable offence is registered.

Allegations of Dual Birth Dates

The complaint was filed by Sudershan Mehta , a retired Senior Deputy Superintendent of Police and former Joint Honorary Secretary of the Jammu and Kashmir Cricket Association. Mehta alleged that Manhas used two different dates of birth to gain an unfair advantage in junior-level cricket selections. According to the complaint, records from Maharaja Hari Singh Agriculture Collegiate (MHAC) School, Nagbani, Jammu , obtained via email, list Manhas's date of birth as December 9, 1977 . In contrast, the official website of the Delhi and District Cricket Association (DDCA) reportedly records his date of birth as October 12, 1979 .

The complainant asserted that Manhas was initially a student at Presentation Convent Gandhi Nagar, shifted to MHAC School in Class 6 on July 27, 1988 (admission number 2236), and later studied at Mahavir Jain Higher Secondary School, Jammu, during 1993–95. The alleged discrepancy, Mehta argued, was part of a deliberate scheme to misrepresent his age and gain eligibility for sub-junior and junior national cricket tournaments under the banners of J&K Cricket Association and DDCA.

Court's Procedural Path

After perusing the application and supporting material, the court noted that under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 , a preliminary inquiry is a mandatory prerequisite before the police can register a cognizable offence. The Magistrate observed:

“I have perused the application and other material annexed with the application and as per the provisions of BNSS before lodging or registering any cognizable offence by the concerned police, preliminary inquiry has to be conducted by the Magistrate.”

Based on this procedural requirement, the court refrained from ordering direct registration of an FIR. Instead, it directed the Station House Officer of Police Station Nowabad, Jammu, to conduct a thorough preliminary inquiry and submit a report to the court by September 3, 2026 . The court emphasized that the direction does not amount to a finding of guilt against Manhas.

Broader Context

Mithun Manhas, a former first-class cricketer who represented Jammu and Kashmir and Delhi, became the first person from the union territory to be elected BCCI President in September 2025. The allegations of age manipulation are not unprecedented in Indian cricket, with several players, including Manjot Kalra and Rasikh Salam, having faced similar controversies. The complainant had earlier approached the police, including the SP City North Jammu, but claimed no action was taken.

Key Observations from the Judgment

The court's order highlights the importance of a preliminary inquiry as a filter before criminal proceedings are initiated. The key observations include:

  • The complaint was filed under Section 175(3) of BNSS seeking registration of an FIR for alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 321, and 323 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023 , corresponding to fraud, cheating, and forgery of date of birth.
  • The complainant supported the application with an affidavit and sought action against Manhas for allegedly fabricating records to participate in junior cricket.
  • The court directed: “SHO P/S Nowabad, Jammu is directed to conduct preliminary enquiry into the matter and submit its report before this court by or before 03.09.2026.”

What Happens Next?

The police inquiry will now examine the veracity of the documents and allegations. The report will determine whether the material warrants registration of a criminal case. The matter is listed for further review on September 3, 2026. Until then, the allegations remain under scrutiny, and the court has reserved judgment on whether an FIR should be ordered.

This case underscores the procedural safeguards under the BNSS, ensuring that complaints are investigated through a preliminary inquiry before a full-fledged criminal investigation is launched.