Seeks AAG Assistance on BNSS Applicability to Pre-2024 Defamation Case
JAMMU, – The has sought the assistance of the Senior Additional Advocate General (AAG) to determine whether the applies to a defamation case that arose in , when the was still in force.
Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal, presiding over the matter, noted that an "" had been raised, warranting the court to request , learned Senior AAG, to render valuable assistance in appreciating the controversy. The court has issued and listed the matter for on .
The Core Legal Question
The dispute centers on a defamation complaint filed by . The allegedly defamatory episode occurred in , and the complaint was filed in . However, by , the BNSS, had already replaced the CrPC, 1973.
The chose to proceed under the BNSS, and later dismissed an application from the petitioner seeking to continue the proceedings under the old CrPC. This decision has been challenged before the High Court.
Arguments and the Court's Approach
While the order does not detail the full arguments of the parties, the petitioner, represented by , has raised the fundamental question of whether the BNSS can govern a case that arose entirely during the life of the CrPC. The respondent is represented by , appearing for .
Recognizing the significance of the issue, the court has decided to seek the AAG's input before proceeding to a . This suggests the court considers the matter to have broader implications for how —those straddling the repeal of the old code and the introduction of the new one—should be handled.
Key Observations
While the court did not issue a detailed ruling on , its decision to seek the AAG’s assistance underscores the complexity of the legal question. The passage of the BNSS, , which replaced the CrPC, 1973, has created for cases with facts that predate the new law.
Court's Decision and Implications
The court has directed that the matter be listed on , for . The involvement of the AAG indicates that the court is looking for a comprehensive view of the state's position on the applicability of the BNSS to such .
The outcome of this case will be closely watched by legal practitioners, as it could set a for how other pre-2024 cases are processed under the new criminal procedure regime. A ruling in favor of the petitioner could compel trial courts to revert to the CrPC for cases arising before the BNSS came into effect, potentially affecting hundreds of pending matters across Jammu & Kashmir.