High Court of Kerala Rules Bar Councils Cannot Charge Fees for Certificate Verification During Enrollment

The Verification Fee Dispute: A Barrier to Entry Removed

For law graduates, the journey to becoming an enrolled advocate is a rite of passage. However, for petitioner Alan Benny, this transition was stalled by a contentious financial demand: a fee for the mandatory verification of his academic certificates by the Bar Council. In a significant decision, the High Court of Kerala has stepped in, declaring that regulatory bodies cannot impose unauthorized fees on candidates seeking entry into the legal profession.

The Conflict: Fees vs. Fair Access

The dispute arose when the petitioner sought enrollment with the Bar Council of Kerala. As part of an interim order in his writ petition, a Single Judge had permitted his enrollment, but only on the condition that he produce a receipt showing he had paid for the verification of his SSLC, Plus Two, Degree, and LLB certificates.

The petitioner challenged this requirement, citing a directive from the Supreme Court of India. The Bar Council of India, however, defended the charge, pointing to a 2017 circular (BCI:D:529/2017) that mandated a fee of Rs. 2,500 for the verification process.

What the Supreme Court Directed

The High Court drew heavily from a landmark Supreme Court order. The apex court had previously directed that Universities and Examination Boards must verify the genuineness of educational certificates without charging any fees. Crucially, the Supreme Court emphasized that the Bar Council is the entity obligated to requisition these verifications.

The Kerala High Court concluded that since the duty is cast upon the Bar Council to secure these reports, they cannot shift the financial burden of this administrative task onto the students.

The High Court’s Verdict: Clearing the Path

The Division Bench of Justice Ziyad Rahman A.A. and Justice P. V. Balakrishnan found no legal basis for the state-level Bar Council to demand these charges. They clarified that the collection of such fees contradicts the spirit of the Advocates Act, 1961.

“We do not find any entitlement on the part of the 1st respondent to collect the fees for verification,” the court stated, decisively invalidating the implementation of the Bar Council’s 2017 fee notice in this context.

Immediate Relief for Aspiring Advocates

Acknowledging that the next enrollment cycle was imminent, the Court refused to let bureaucratic delays hinder the applicant’s future. The Bar Council was ordered to process the application and initiate verification immediately, but the court ruled that the petitioner should be permitted to enroll even if the verification process remained pending.

The Court added a safeguard: if, upon completion, the certificates were found to be non-genuine, the Bar Council reserves the right to cancel the enrollment. This balancing act ensures that administrative efficiency does not come at the cost of an aspiring lawyer's career.

Key Observations

• "There is a specific direction issued by the Hon’ble Supreme Court to the effect that all Universities and Examination Boards shall verify the genuineness of the educational certificates without charging any fee."
• "The State Bar Council cannot charge ‘enrollment fees’ beyond the express legal stipulation under Section 24(1)(f) of the Advocates Act, 1961."
• "There is a duty cast upon the Bar Council to get the certificates of the applicant verified by the concerned Boards and Universities, without charging any fees."

This ruling serves as a strong reminder that the processes governing legal enrollment must strictly adhere to the financial frameworks established by the Advocates Act and the wisdom of the Supreme Court, ensuring the Bar remains accessible to all qualified candidates.