Case Law
Subject : Civil Law - Appellate Jurisdiction
Note to Reader: The provided court document contains only the case title, parties, and case number. It does not include the body of the judgment, such as the facts, legal arguments, court's reasoning, or final decision. Therefore, a comprehensive news article cannot be generated.
The following structure outlines the information that would be necessary to create a complete report on the judgment.
(This section would summarize the final ruling of the Kerala High Court in the Regular Second Appeal (RSA) No. 87 of 2012. It would clarify whether the appeal filed by K.C. Chellappan was allowed or dismissed and briefly state the core reason for the court's decision.)
(This section would detail the history of the legal dispute between the appellant, K.C. Chellappan, and the respondents, Kunjukutty and others. It would explain the initial lawsuit, the decisions of the lower courts (Trial Court and First Appellate Court), and the substantial question of law that prompted the High Court to admit this Second Appeal.)
Appellant's Contentions (K.C. Chellappan): (This part would outline the key legal arguments made by the appellant's counsel. It would focus on how the lower courts allegedly erred in their interpretation of law or appreciation of facts, forming the basis for the appeal.)
Respondents' Submissions (Kunjukutty and Others): (This would cover the counter-arguments presented by the respondents' counsel, defending the correctness of the lower courts' judgments and urging the High Court to dismiss the appeal.)
(This critical section would delve into the High Court's examination of the case. It would explain the legal principles and precedents the court relied upon to arrive at its conclusion. Any pivotal excerpts from the judgment, highlighting the judges' rationale on the substantial questions of law involved, would be included here.)
(The concluding section would state the High Court's final order in clear terms. It would explain the practical consequences of the judgment for the parties involved and its potential impact on similar future cases, establishing or reinforcing a legal precedent.)
#KeralaHighCourt #CivilLaw #SecondAppeal
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Belated Challenge by Non-Bidders to GeM Tender Conditions for School Sports Equipment Not Maintainable: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Supreme Court Clears Thakur, Verma in Hate Speech Case
01 May 2026
Appointment of Central Govt Employees as Vote Counting Staff Valid Under ECI Delegation: Calcutta HC
01 May 2026
Arrest Memo with Essential Allegations Satisfies Article 22(1) Grounds Requirement: Uttarakhand High Court
01 May 2026
Karnataka HC: Writ Petition Not Maintainable for Copyright Infringement in Film Certification; Remedy Lies in Civil Suit
01 May 2026
Comedy Show Remarks Without Deliberate Malicious Intent Don't Attract Section 295A IPC: Bombay HC Quashes FIR
01 May 2026
Decrees from Indian Courts Not 'Foreign Judgments' Under Portuguese CPC 1939: Bombay HC at Goa
01 May 2026
Supreme Court Issues Notice on Kannur Corporation's Challenge to Kerala HC Siren Discontinuation Order
01 May 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.