Orders Correction Of Inaccurate Police Data Regarding MP MLA Cases
In a significant move to ensure , the has intervened in the management of criminal cases involving sitting and former Members of Parliament and Legislative Assemblies. Under the leadership of Chief Justice Soumen Sen and Justice V.M. Syam Kumar, the bench scrutinized the vast statistical disparities between official reports submitted by the court’s administration and the .
The Statistical Gap and Judicial Concern
The court's internal records indicated that as of , there were 555 cases against legislators. However, a report filed by the reported only 256 cases as of . Finding this discrepancy unacceptable, the court has directed the police leadership to correct their records to reflect current, accurate data.
The court further noted that the issue extends beyond reporting; there are recurring delays in the execution of legal processes. Reports from the highlight that 12 cases for over five years, along with 31 cases for over two years, remain stalled due to the failure to execute and .
Seeking Accountability on the Ground
The court has voiced concerns regarding the inaction surrounding unexecuted , particularly in Thiruvananthapuram city. The has been instructed to prepare a comprehensive report, incorporating the findings delivered by the Registrar of the on . This mandate aims to enforce greater diligence in the and ensure that the judiciary receives reliable information to facilitate timely justice.
Key Observations
-
"The statistics furnished by the needs correction."
-
"The report filed by the shows that there are 12 five plus year old cases in which process ( / ) remains ."
-
"The is directed to file a comprehensive report, after taking into consideration, the compliance report filed by the Registrar."
The Path Forward
The High Court has underscored the necessity for synchronization between police records and judicial databases. By tasking the with overseeing the compliance report, the court aims to institutionalize reporting accuracy. The matter is scheduled for further hearing on , when the court expects to review the comprehensive update and address the continued in these sensitive legal proceedings.