Foreign Medical Graduate Licentiate Regulations
Subject : Administrative Law - Medical Education Regulation
The High Court of Kerala has overturned a single-judge decision, ruling that Foreign Medical Graduates (FMGs) who transitioned to online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic must complete a compulsory clinical clerkship. This judgment reinforces the regulatory authority of the National Medical Commission (NMC) and the State Medical Councils in maintaining the rigorous standards required for medical practice in India.
The dispute involved eight FMGs who pursued medical degrees in China starting in the 2017-2018 academic year. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, these students returned to India and completed a significant portion of their theory-heavy curriculum via online classes. While these students later returned to China for "compensatory classes," the Kerala State Medical Council determined these sessions were insufficient to bridge the gap in clinical skills. Consequently, the Council mandated that these students undergo a one-year clinical clerkship followed by a one-year Compulsory Rotating Medical Internship (CRMI).
The students challenged this mandate in the High Court, initially succeeding before a single judge who exempted them from the additional clerkship. The Kerala State Medical Council subsequently appealed this decision.
The appellant, the Kerala State Medical Council, argued that the compensatory classes undertaken by the students were inadequate as they did not match the duration of the online instruction. Relying on NMC public notices, the Council emphasized that medical education is not merely theoretical but depends on hands-on practical experience.
Conversely, the respondents (the students) contended that they had obtained valid graduation certificates and that their compensatory training had already been verified by the Embassy. They argued that imposing additional clerkships after they had already fulfilled the requirements set by their parent universities was arbitrary and unjustified.
The Division Bench of the High Court, led by P.V. Balakrishnan, J., underscored that the court is not an expert body tasked with determining medical equivalence. The Court emphasized that regulatory bodies like the NMC are best equipped to mandate standards that protect the public health interest.
The Court observed: "The medical profession deals with precious human life, therefore the life of Indian citizens cannot be put at stake of poorly trained medical professionals." By citing recent clarifications by the NMC, the Court clarified that "sufficiently compensated" implies an equal duration of physical, hands-on training to replace the online period—a criterion the students failed to meet.
The judgment identifies the following pivotal reasoning for its reversal:
The High Court set aside the previous judgment, dismissing the writ petition filed by the students. The ruling effectively mandates that until an FMG can demonstrate that they have undergone physical, in-person clinical training that is structurally equivalent to the duration of their time spent in online learning, they cannot bypass the clinical clerkship requirements. This decision is expected to serve as a significant precedent for State Medical Councils across India as they navigate the influx of applications from foreign graduates seeking registration in the post-pandemic era.
compulsory-internship - clinical-clerkship - medical-standards - online-classes - compensatory-training
#MedicalEducation #FMG
Supreme Court Rules States Cannot Cite Financial Burden To Delay Judges Retiring At Sixty-Two
06 Aug 2026
Rajasthan High Court Demands Comprehensive Affidavit To Remove Encroachments Affecting Critical Ramgarh Dam Water Flow
06 Aug 2026
How Does Algorithmic Bias In Forest Governance Impact Adivasi Rights In Modern India Today?
06 Aug 2026
Christ University Pune Lavasa Hosts International Conference On Indian Knowledge Systems And Global Governance
06 Aug 2026
Bombay High Court Rules Pre-2015 Unilateral Arbitrator Appointments Valid if Contractually Authorized by Agreement
06 Aug 2026
Madras High Court orders TASMAC to issue bills for every liquor sale amid overcharging row
07 Aug 2026
Ernst & Young Announces Applications for Senior Associate Role in Legal Practice
08 Aug 2026
Kerala High Court Salutes R. Rajesh's Supreme Sacrifice, Urges Vigilance in Kochi Flood Prevention
08 Aug 2026
Supreme Court Backs Balanced Calcutta High Court Order on TMC Frozen Accounts in ED Probe
12 Aug 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.