SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next

Foreign Medical Graduate Licentiate Regulations

Clinical Clerkship Requirement for Foreign Medical Graduates Upheld by Kerala High Court Due to Inadequate Compensatory Training - 2025-12-01

Subject : Administrative Law - Medical Education Regulation

Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
Clinical Clerkship Requirement for Foreign Medical Graduates Upheld by Kerala High Court Due to Inadequate Compensatory Training

Supreme Today News Desk

Clinical Clerkship Requirement for Foreign Medical Graduates Upheld by Kerala High Court Due to Inadequate Compensatory Training

The High Court of Kerala has overturned a single-judge decision, ruling that Foreign Medical Graduates (FMGs) who transitioned to online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic must complete a compulsory clinical clerkship. This judgment reinforces the regulatory authority of the National Medical Commission (NMC) and the State Medical Councils in maintaining the rigorous standards required for medical practice in India.

The Backdrop of the Dispute

The dispute involved eight FMGs who pursued medical degrees in China starting in the 2017-2018 academic year. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, these students returned to India and completed a significant portion of their theory-heavy curriculum via online classes. While these students later returned to China for "compensatory classes," the Kerala State Medical Council determined these sessions were insufficient to bridge the gap in clinical skills. Consequently, the Council mandated that these students undergo a one-year clinical clerkship followed by a one-year Compulsory Rotating Medical Internship (CRMI).

The students challenged this mandate in the High Court, initially succeeding before a single judge who exempted them from the additional clerkship. The Kerala State Medical Council subsequently appealed this decision.

Arguments from the Bench and Bar

The appellant, the Kerala State Medical Council, argued that the compensatory classes undertaken by the students were inadequate as they did not match the duration of the online instruction. Relying on NMC public notices, the Council emphasized that medical education is not merely theoretical but depends on hands-on practical experience.

Conversely, the respondents (the students) contended that they had obtained valid graduation certificates and that their compensatory training had already been verified by the Embassy. They argued that imposing additional clerkships after they had already fulfilled the requirements set by their parent universities was arbitrary and unjustified.

Legal Analysis: The Priority of Clinical Competence

The Division Bench of the High Court, led by P.V. Balakrishnan, J., underscored that the court is not an expert body tasked with determining medical equivalence. The Court emphasized that regulatory bodies like the NMC are best equipped to mandate standards that protect the public health interest.

The Court observed: "The medical profession deals with precious human life, therefore the life of Indian citizens cannot be put at stake of poorly trained medical professionals." By citing recent clarifications by the NMC, the Court clarified that "sufficiently compensated" implies an equal duration of physical, hands-on training to replace the online period—a criterion the students failed to meet.

Key Observations

The judgment identifies the following pivotal reasoning for its reversal:

  • On Regulatory Autonomy: "Registration of the medical graduates is within the domain of the appellant and they are to assess the eligibility of the applicants independently."
  • On Compensatory Standards: "The online period of any duration in one academic year cannot be compensated along with the academics of the next year offline, without extension of the study period."
  • On Public Interest: "It is imperative that the objectives underlying the requirements stipulated under the FMGL 2021 are given due prominence and strict adherence while granting registration."

Final Ruling and Implications

The High Court set aside the previous judgment, dismissing the writ petition filed by the students. The ruling effectively mandates that until an FMG can demonstrate that they have undergone physical, in-person clinical training that is structurally equivalent to the duration of their time spent in online learning, they cannot bypass the clinical clerkship requirements. This decision is expected to serve as a significant precedent for State Medical Councils across India as they navigate the influx of applications from foreign graduates seeking registration in the post-pandemic era.

compulsory-internship - clinical-clerkship - medical-standards - online-classes - compensatory-training

#MedicalEducation #FMG

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top