Kerala High Court Vacates Stay On TV Rating Policy Regarding Landing Page Viewership Measurement

In a significant development for the broadcasting industry, the Kerala High Court on Friday vacated its interim stay on a contentious provision of the Television Ratings Policy, 2026. The decision, delivered by Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas, permits the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting to proceed with its plan to exclude viewership generated through "landing pages" from official television audience measurements.

The Core Dispute

The legal battle originated when the All India Digital Cable Federation and DEN Networks challenged the proviso to Clause 5.4.1 of the new government policy. This clause stipulates that any viewership recorded from a "landing page"—the default channel that appears when a subscriber activates their set-top box—shall not be counted toward official TV ratings. The Ministry asserted that such "forced viewing" does not reflect a legitimate viewer choice and distorts the integrity of the data.

The petitioners had argued that this change would negatively impact their advertising revenue, asserting that it infringed upon their fundamental rights to carry on a business under Article 19(1)(g) and freedom of expression under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India.

Legal Analysis and Reasoning

The Kerala High Court declined to accept the petitioners' claims, clarifying the legal distinction between the freedom to do business and the guarantee of profitability. Justice Thomas noted that the government’s policy on audience measurement is a matter of executive domain and that entities have no vested right to insist on a specific methodology for data computation.

The Court further distinguished the current controversy from a separate ongoing matter before the Supreme Court of India. While appellants contended that the Ministry was attempting to indirectly enforce regulatory measures previously challenged by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, the High Court observed that the government's current policy specifically concerns audience measurement methodology rather than channel placement regulations.

Key Observations

During the proceedings, the court emphasized the nature of the policy and the limitations of constitutional protection:

  • "The right to do business is distinct from the right to profitability."
  • "As is prima facie evident from the pleadings and the documents produced, television rating is a matter of policy of the Government. What should be included for identifying TV Rating and what should be excluded, are all prima facie matters of policy."
  • "Ratings based on landing page is not a vested right . It is also not a true reflection of the viewer's choice."

Implications for the Industry

The immediate effect of this order is that the Broadcast Audience Research Council India is no longer restrained from implementing the revised measurement methodology. With the stay vacated, the industry moves closer to a structural overhaul of how viewers' habits are quantified. While the broader case remains pending, the decision marks a major win for the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting as it seeks to standardize data accuracy across digital and cable platforms. The matter is currently scheduled for further consideration on September 11, where the merits of the petitioners' main challenge will be examined in more detail.