Back
Lawyers Condemn Police On Student Protesters Challenging NEET Examination Irregularities In Delhi
The recent escalation of student protests stemming from alleged irregularities in the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET-UG) has reached a critical juncture, drawing sharp condemnation from the Indian legal fraternity. Following the police crackdown on demonstrators near Jantar Mantar on , hundreds of lawyers, including distinguished senior advocates and former members of the judiciary, have decried what they characterize as a fundamental assault on and the .
The protest, organized by the , centered on demands for the resignation of Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan and a thorough investigation into recurring examination leaks that have undermined the academic future of thousands. The situation intensified when a planned march toward the Parliament of India resulted in significant friction between demonstrators and heavy police deployment, leading to allegations of indiscriminate , the use of tear gas, and .
Constitutional Values and the Right to Dissent
The legal community’s response has been swift and organized. A joint statement signed by over 650 lawyers—including stalwarts such as senior advocates , , , and —framed the protest not as a mere administrative dispute, but as a struggle for the protection of core constitutional values.
"The sight of students being met with violence instead of dialogue is unacceptable. Police brutality against protesting students is an attack on the principles of free expression, human dignity, and the right to dissent,"
the signatories stated. They emphasized that in a robust
,
is an exercise of the foundational freedoms guaranteed under
and 19(1)(b) of the
.
The has further bolstered this position, passing a formal resolution expressing that the resort to "" against both students and members of the bar who were present was deeply disturbing. The SCBA has demanded an immediate, impartial, and time-bound inquiry, arguing that the state’s response to public grievance must adhere to measures of necessity and proportionality.
Legal Obstruction and Procedural Concerns
For legal practitioners providing services to the detained students, the primary challenge has been the lack of from law enforcement. Lawyers attempting to secure the release of detainees have reported persistent difficulties in obtaining copies of and identifying the locations of individuals held in police custody.
"The biggest challenge is that the police are not sharing the names of detainees or allowing lawyers to meet them,"
noted advocate
. Reports from the ground indicate that detainees were frequently shifted between various stations, such as the Janpath, Parliament Street, and Mandir Marg facilities, creating a deliberate barrier for legal counsel. Furthermore, legal bodies have raised serious concerns regarding the potential abuse of
. In Mumbai, for instance, lawyers challenged the legitimacy of back-to-back orders issued under
, which restricted public assemblies for extended periods by utilizing a 24-hour gap to circumvent the statutory 15-day limit without higher government sanction.
The Role of the Judiciary
While the legal fraternity has sought intervention, the judiciary’s role remains a subject of ongoing scrutiny. In the
, a bench headed by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, along with Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V. Mohana, declined an urgent listing for a petition challenging the police tactics. During the hearing, the Court expressed a reluctance to review video evidence directly, with the CJI remarking,
"Don't waste our time. We don't want to watch any videos."
Conversely, the has taken a more direct stance, having ordered the preservation of all CCTV footage and related records of the protest site following allegations that an Additional Deputy Commissioner of Police was captured on video physically assaulting a female protester. This development has invited broader political implications, with various opposition figures filing complaints and seeking criminal proceedings against involved personnel.
Impact on Legal Practice and Democratic Discourse
The involvement of the legal community in this movement extends beyond mere moral support; it highlights a growing anxiety regarding the contraction of space for civil society. By reading the Preamble of the Constitution in public acts of protest, senior practitioners are signaling that the institutional mechanisms of the law are being tested by a state machinery that prefers enforcement over engagement.
The call for the abolition of the and the decentralization of entrance examinations—as championed by groups like the and the —is now being echoed by legal bodies who argue that such reform is necessary to ensure transparency. The broader demand for justice for the students has coalesced into a unified call for an independent, high-level inquiry that transcends political maneuvering.
Conclusion
The ongoing conflict regarding the NEET examination irregularities and the ensuing police response marks a watershed moment for in India. As thousands of students persist in their agitation, the legal community remains firmly entrenched in its efforts to hold authority accountable. Whether the systemic issues surrounding examination integrity are addressed or if the state continues to rely on restrictive policing remains a point of significant friction. For now, the legal fraternity’s insistence on "" serves as a bulwark against the further erosion of the right to peaceful protest, setting the stage for protracted legal battles that will surely redefine the parameters of civic engagement in the country.
