Back
Madhya Pradesh HC Orders Crackdown on Loudspeaker Noise Pollution After Child's Death in School
In a strongly-worded order, the has directed the State government and police authorities to strictly enforce noise pollution norms following the tragic death of a seven-year-old child due to high-volume loudspeaker noise from a passing procession. A Division Bench comprising Justice Subodh Abhyankar and Justice Jai Kumar Pillai issued the directions while hearing a filed in .
A Judicial Wake-Up Call
The court was initially inclined to close the PIL after the respondents filed a detailed reply claiming adequate measures were in place. However, the judges themselves witnessed rampant violations while commuting home from the court. “So many loud noises were coming from almost all directions, and while commuting from the Court to our houses also, we found that in many places the loudspeakers were blasting away all the limits of sound barriers,” the Bench observed.
Compounding their concern was a newspaper report that a seven-year-old child had died in school due to the extreme noise from a procession’s loudspeakers. “It is apparent that the said noises polluting the atmosphere could not be heard by the concerned officers of the administration, who are responsible for curbing the same,” the court noted, describing the ground reality as “rather grim.”
Legal Framework and Enforcement Directives
The court directed strict compliance with the and the . Authorities were ordered to take appropriate legal action against violators.
Specifically, the court ordered: - Publication of a list of designated in widely circulated daily newspapers. - Invitation of public requests to declare additional prominent places as . - Publicizing dedicated complaint and phone numbers for citizens to report noise pollution.
The court directed the respondents to submit a fresh compliance report within one week. The matter is listed for further hearing on .
Broader Implications
This case underscores the judiciary’s proactive role in enforcing the under , which includes the right to a peaceful environment and sleep. The judges’ willingness to rely on their personal observations and media reports highlights the seriousness with which courts treat administrative indifference to statutory violations.
The petitioners, represented by Advocate , had argued that unchecked noise from loudspeakers, DJs, religious programmes, and marriages infringed . The State, represented by Government Advocate and others, now faces intensified scrutiny.
With the next hearing set for October, all eyes will be on the State’s compliance and the effectiveness of the newly ordered transparency measures.
