Back
Appointed Interim Chairman of by BCI
The (BCI) has stepped in to fill an administrative gap in the by appointing , the Advocate General for the State of Punjab, as its interim Chairman. The decision, taken by circulation on and communicated on , addresses the vacancy created when the previous interim Chairman, , was elevated as an Additional Judge of the . The appointment is intended to ensure continuity in the functioning of the State Bar Council until its full constitution is completed and assume office.
Background of the Vacancy
The is a statutory body responsible for regulating the legal profession and advocating for the interests of lawyers in the region. Its elected members have already been chosen through a completed election process, but the Council has not yet been fully constituted. The had directed the of two women members to the Council, a step that remains pending. Until that process is finalized, the election of the Chairman, Vice-Chairman, and other office-bearers cannot proceed.
To prevent a complete administrative vacuum, the BCI had earlier, on , directed that the charge be handed over to , who was then the Senior Advocate General for Haryana. Chauhan served as the interim Chairman until his elevation to the High Court bench. With his subsequent departure from the role, the State Bar Council requested a fresh from the BCI.
The BCI's Decision and Rationale
The BCI, in its communication, noted that both and the incumbent Advocate General for Haryana are members of the State Bar Council, and thus eligible to hold the interim charge. However, the BCI found that Bedi had held the office of Advocate General for Punjab continuously for a longer period than his Haryana counterpart, a factor that weighed in his favour. Accordingly, the BCI resolved to entrust Bedi with the interim charge as Chairman with immediate effect.
The decision explicitly states that the arrangement is
"confined to the peculiar and temporary circumstances presently prevailing"
and is not to be treated as a
for appointing a Chairman or Vice-Chairman of any State Bar Council otherwise than in accordance with the
, and the applicable Rules. This careful wording underscores the BCI's intention to avoid establishing a practice that could circumvent the statutory process for electing office-bearers.
Legal Implications and Compliance with Supreme Court Directions
A critical aspect of the BCI's order is its explicit acknowledgment of the pending Supreme Court-mandated process for the of two women members. The BCI has clarified that the will not affect, delay, or pre-empt that process, which is to proceed independently. This ensures compliance with the Supreme Court's directions while allowing the Council to function in the meantime.
The will continue only until the Council's composition is completed and its assume office, or until a further BCI decision or court order, whichever occurs first. At that point, Bedi is to hand over charge to the duly elected Chairman. This prevents the arrangement from becoming indefinite.
Impact on the Legal Community and Practice
For legal professionals in Punjab and Haryana, the appointment of a senior advocate general as interim chairman brings a level of administrative stability to the Bar Council. The Council is responsible for issuing practicing certificates, overseeing the ethics of the Bar, and addressing grievances of lawyers. Without a functional Chairman, these functions could stall, causing delays in disciplinary matters and other regulatory activities.
The appointment also sends a signal about the BCI's willingness to use its under the Advocates Act to step in when statutory processes are incomplete. However, the explicit disclaimer that this is not a means that the BCI is unlikely to adopt a similar approach in other state bar councils without a clear necessity.
Conclusion
The BCI's interim appointment of is a pragmatic response to an unusual situation—the elevation of the previous interim Chairman and the continued pendency of the Supreme Court's directive on women . By selecting a senior advocate general with a longer tenure and ensuring that the arrangement does not interfere with ongoing court-mandated processes, the BCI has balanced the need for immediate administrative continuity with respect for statutory and judicial oversight. The legal community will now watch as the moves toward full constitution and the election of its permanent leadership.
