Back
Next 
judgement
2024-06-13
Subject: - Education
The Meghalaya High Court has issued a judgment in the case of Smti Lemina K. Marak, a widow of a former non-teaching staff member of a District Council school in the state. The case was filed against the State of Meghalaya and various government departments, seeking the release of her late husband's pension benefits.
The petitioner, Smti Lemina K. Marak, argued that her late husband was entitled to pension benefits as a non-teaching staff member of a District Council school that was taken over by the state government under the Meghalaya (Taking over of District Council Lower Primary Schools) Act, 1993. The state respondents acknowledged the receipt of the petitioner's representation and stated that they were trying to resolve the issue regarding the payment of pensionary benefits to the non-teaching staff, including the petitioner's late husband.
The Meghalaya High Court noted that this case was similar to other matters that had been brought before the court regarding the entitlement and payment of pension to non-teaching staff of District Council schools taken over by the state government. The court observed that in the earlier matters, the state respondents had provided the petitioners with their due pension entitlements.
The court also took note of the state respondents' affidavit, which stated that they were trying to resolve the issue of pension payments for the non-teaching staff, including the petitioner's late husband. The court found this to be a satisfactory response and decided to dispose of the matter.
The Meghalaya High Court directed the state respondents to expedite the process for consideration of the family pension to the petitioner, Smti Lemina K. Marak. The court expected the process to be completed within a period of four months from the date a copy of the order was presented to the state respondents.
Victim's Elopement, No Medical Corroboration Bars Rape Conviction Under Sections 376 IPC, 6 POCSO: Karnataka High Court
18 Feb 2026
Approach Statutory Authorities First Before Invoking Article 32 for Ganga Sewage Issue: Supreme Court
18 Feb 2026
Degrees Obtained Before Ultra Vires Act Struck Down Remain Valid for Employment: Supreme Court
18 Feb 2026
Supreme Court Flags Bad Message in Yadav Snake Case
18 Feb 2026
FIR Under Repealed Foreigners Act, 1946 Quashed for Post-2025 Violation: MP High Court
18 Feb 2026
Homeopathy Practitioners Can't Prescribe Allopathy Meds: Telangana HC Quashes Proceedings for Non-Compliance with Section 54 NMCA
18 Feb 2026
Transport & Infrastructure Issues Cannot Justify Absence from Duty: J&K&L HC Upholds Termination of Contractual NHM Worker
18 Feb 2026
Hasin Jahan Seeks Supreme Court Transfer of Shami Cases to Delhi
18 Feb 2026
Bombay HC Demands Mallya's Return for FEO Challenge
18 Feb 2026
Delhi High Court Directs BCD to Protect Lawyers' Privacy
18 Feb 2026
The court emphasized the need for the State respondents to consider the petitioner's case for regularization of services and highlighted the possibility of consequential benefits if the representatio....
Entitlement to pension and retirement benefits confirmed, emphasizing fair procedural process for claims despite initial delays.
In the absence of a specific rule extending pension benefits to teachers of non-Government DA getting primary schools, the benefit of pension cannot be claimed or extended to them.
Entitlement to pension and retiral benefits cannot be denied based on the financial capability of the employer, and must be determined based on relevant government resolutions and court orders.
Entitlement to timely pension payments upon retirement as per legal precedent.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
