Back
NCDRC Transfers Case to Odisha After West Bengal Commission Altered Crucial Digital Order Records
In a significant order addressing the integrity of digital legal records, the (NCDRC) has transferred a long-standing builder-buyer dispute from the to the . The decision, led by President Justice A. P. Sahi and Member Bharatkumar Pandya, followed credible evidence that the were modified on the e-jagriti portal.
The Digital Discrepancy
The controversy originated from a consumer complaint filed by regarding the delay in the delivery of a real estate unit. The petitioner, Mani Square Limited, alleged that the interim orders passed by the West Bengal State Commission were manipulated. Specifically, the petitioner claimed that an order originally stating that stay applications would be heard on a future date was altered to include a specific grant of an "," without the company being heard on the matter.
Investigations conducted by the confirmed these concerns. The official report revealed that the digital record underwent "definalization" by a member of the commission, followed by a re-upload of a modified order.
Arguments from the Parties
Mani Square Limited argued that the proceedings were tainted by , noting that the complainant’s spouse was an employee of the West Bengal State Commission. The company asserted that this link created a , particularly given the unexplained anomalies in the, then, finalized judicial orders.
Conversely, the respondent maintained that the proceedings were conducted according to established protocol and denied any intentional interference with the digital records. Despite these claims, the state commission's own internal inquiry later acknowledged the factual inconsistencies in the system’s logs.
Legal Analysis and Key Observations
The NCDRC’s bench expressed deep concern over the procedural irregularities, stating that such actions struck at the very heart of public confidence in the judicial process.
Key observations from the judgment include:
*
"The procedure of the passing of the orders impugned in the Revision Petition and the sequence indicating that the order was de-finalized by an Hon’ble Member indicates that it has violated the
."
*
"The digital record of the order dated
was subjected to 'definalisation' on two distinct occasions... the hypothesis that the original text was altered post-definalisation cannot be ruled out."
*
"We find that there is a
borne out coupled with a reasonable apprehension, which calls for an interference in the exercise of our
."
Court’s Decision and Future Implications
Finding the allegations of irregularity substantiated by the NIC report, the invoked , to set aside the orders dated and .
The NCDRC formally transferred the complaint to the , mandating that the records be transmitted to the new forum for a fresh, impartial hearing. This ruling serves as a stern reminder of the sanctity of digital court records and reinforces the principle that judicial processes must not only be fair but must also appear beyond reproach. Parties are expected to appear before the designated commission in Cuttack on .
