Appeals to Lawyers, Interns to Stop Reels on Premises
The , representing the legal fraternity at the (Lucknow Bench), has issued a formal appeal urging advocates, junior advocates, advocate clerks, and law interns to cease the practice of creating and uploading short video clips—commonly known as “reels”—on the court premises. The appeal, dated , expresses concern that such activities are undermining the dignity of the High Court and the legal profession.
The association stated that it had received reports of individuals, including young advocates and interns, filming reels while wearing advocate attire, even in the rain, and posting them on social media platforms. The notice, signed by General Secretary , does not prescribe any disciplinary action but instead calls upon all members of the Bar and their associates to voluntarily refrain from such conduct. This move highlights the growing tension between the traditional decorum of court premises and the modern culture of social media content creation.
Background: The Rise of Social Media in the Legal Profession
In recent years, the legal profession has seen a surge in the use of social media platforms by lawyers, law students, and interns. Short-form video content, particularly on platforms like Instagram and TikTok, has become a popular medium for sharing experiences, legal insights, and even humorous takes on courtroom life. While many such videos are harmless and even educational, the line between and casual content creation often blurs when filmed within the precincts of a court.
The ’s appeal is not an isolated incident. Similar concerns have been raised by bar councils and high courts across India, where judges have occasionally taken note of lawyers filming inside courtrooms or corridors. The fundamental issue revolves around the as a place of justice, where dignity and solemnity are paramount. The ’s Rules on explicitly require advocates to behave in a manner that upholds the integrity of the judicial system.
Key Developments: The Appeal in Detail
The association’s notice explicitly references an incident where an individual made a reel while wearing an advocate’s gown in the rain on the court premises. Describing this as a “matter of concern,” the notice states: “उनका यह कृत्य माननीय उच्च न्यायालय एवं अवध बार एसोसिएशन की गरिमा को धूमिल कर रहा है।” (Their act is tarnishing the dignity of the Hon’ble High Court and the ).
The appeal is addressed in two parts: first, to senior advocates to ensure that their junior colleagues, clerks, and interns do not engage in such activities; and second, directly to junior advocates, clerks, and interns, urging them to maintain the dignity of the court. Notably, the notice does not specify any penalty or disciplinary action, indicating that the association is seeking voluntary compliance rather than imposing sanctions at this stage.
Legal Analysis: Where Do Reels Fit Within ?
From a perspective, the issue touches upon several provisions of the , and the Rules. mandates that an advocate shall uphold the . prohibits an advocate from soliciting work or advertising, though creating reels may not directly constitute advertising. However, if a reel is used to promote the advocate’s practice or contains content that trivializes court proceedings, it could be seen as a breach of .
Moreover, courts have to regulate their own premises. The could, in theory, initiate if such behavior is deemed to interfere with the . However, the bar association’s approach is more conciliatory, aiming to educate rather than punish. This reflects a recognition that many young lawyers and interns may not fully appreciate the traditional norms of the legal fraternity.
Another relevant aspect is the distinction between public and private spaces within the court complex. While corridors and lawns may be open areas, they are still part of the court premises and subject to the same decorum as the courtroom itself. The wearing of advocate attire further complicates the issue, as it symbolizes the advocate’s role as an , even when not inside a courtroom.
Impact on Legal Practice: A Wake-Up Call for the Digital Age
This appeal serves as a timely reminder for the legal community about the need to balance modern trends with professional obligations. Law interns and junior advocates, many of whom have grown up in the age of social media, may not instinctively perceive filming reels on court premises as disrespectful. However, the ’s notice underscores that the court is not a studio or a tourist spot; it is a hallowed institution where serious legal matters are adjudicated.
For senior advocates, the responsibility to mentor juniors extends beyond legal knowledge to include professional etiquette. The association’s request to senior advocates to ensure compliance is a pragmatic step, as they are often in a position to guide their juniors. Law schools and internships programs may also need to incorporate training on social media conduct within court premises.
The absence of a punitive measure in the notice suggests that the association is giving the legal community an opportunity to self-correct. However, if the practice persists, stricter measures—such as a formal ban or referral to the Bar Council for disciplinary action—may follow. Other bar associations across India may also adopt similar appeals, creating a uniform standard for social media behavior in courts.
Conclusion: Upholding Dignity in a Changing World
The ’s appeal is a significant step in addressing the intersection of traditional legal decorum and modern digital culture. While reels and short videos are a legitimate form of expression, their place is not on court premises where the solemnity of justice must be preserved. The legal community, especially the younger generation, must recognize that the privilege of practicing law comes with the duty to uphold the institution’s dignity.
As the appeal itself notes, the actions of a few can tarnish the reputation of the entire Bar. By voluntarily refraining from such activities, lawyers and interns can ensure that the remains a place of respect and seriousness. The Bar Association’s call is not a prohibition but a reminder of the values that underpin the legal profession—values that transcend trends and remain timeless.