Stampede Incident
Subject : Criminal Law - Public Order Offenses
In a shocking revelation, the lawyer of self-styled godman Bhole Baba has alleged that the deadly stampede that occurred during a religious gathering in Hathras, Uttar Pradesh, was triggered by the release of a poisonous substance in the crowd.
AP
The stampede, which occurred on July 2nd, left 121 people, mostly women, dead.
"There were vehicles parked at the site to help the men escape. We have proof and we will submit it. This is the first time I am speaking about it,"
So far, nine people, including the key accused
Hathras police have also been probing the suspected funding of the congregation by a political party, and have warned of the "strictest possible" action against it.
The Uttar Pradesh government has set up a three-member Judicial Inquiry Commission, led by retired Allahabad High Court judge
The commission will also issue a public notice soon, asking locals and witnesses to share any evidence related to the stampede, along with their statements.
The allegations made by Bhole Baba's lawyer have added a new layer of complexity to the Hathras stampede case. The claims of poisoning and a conspiracy, if proven true, could have far-reaching implications for the ongoing investigations and the search for justice for the victims and their families.
As the judicial commission and the authorities continue their probe, the public will be closely watching to see if these explosive claims can be substantiated and the perpetrators brought to account.
Poisonous substance - Stampede - Conspiracy allegations - Witness claims - Post-mortem reports - Organizer arrests - Political party funding probe - Judicial commission investigation
#HathrasStampede #LegalInvestigation #SelfStyledGodman
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Consolidated SCNs under Sections 73/74 CGST Act Permissible Across Multiple FYs: Karnataka HC
01 May 2026
Allahabad HC Stays NCLT Principal Bench Order Mandating Joint Scrutiny of Allahabad Bench Filings
01 May 2026
Bombay HC Grants Interim Protection from Arrest Despite Pending Anticipatory Bail in Lower Court Due to Accused's Marriage: Sections 351(2), 64(2)(m), 74 IPC
01 May 2026
Heavy Machinery Barred in Mining Leases Except Dredging: Uttarakhand HC Directs DM to Enforce Rule 29(17) of Minor Mineral Rules
01 May 2026
No Deemed Confirmation After Probation Without Written Order Under Model Standing Orders Clause 4A: Bombay High Court
01 May 2026
CJI Declares Sikkim India's First Paperless Judiciary
01 May 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.