Back
Issues Directive to Resolve Ongoing Legal Aid System Disputes
The has introduced seven critical administrative directives to streamline the (LADC) system. This move, spearheaded by Acting Chief Justice Ashwani Kumar Mishra and Justice Rohit Kapoor, aims to restore transparency and protect the fundamental rights of litigants amidst a state-wide protest by legal professionals that has entered its fourth week.
Challenging The Blockade on Justice
The matter arose from a (PIL) filed by advocate , who challenged the prolonged cessation of court work by lawyers across Punjab. The Court expressed grave concern over the "shameful" 27-day blockage of the , emphasizing that while legitimate protests are a protected form of expression, they cannot supersede a citizen's to access the courts.
Administrative Reforms for the LADC
Recognizing that systemic apprehension regarding the misuse of the LADC scheme contributed to the current impasse, the Court issued comprehensive guidelines to regulate the appointment and conduct of . These include mandatory oversight by the Secretary of the (DLSA) for all appointments and a strict prohibition on counsel soliciting work from inmates.
Furthermore, the Court directed that presiding officers must now exhaust procedural alternatives—such as communicating the absence of to the accused—before resorting to the appointment of legal aid, ensuring that an accused’s right to private representation is not prematurely bypassed.
Key Observations from the Bench
Highlighting the gravity of the situation, the bench made clear that the judiciary and the Bar hold shared responsibility for the functioning of the state’s legal infrastructure.
-
"Denial of access to justice, to the common litigant, would be a failure on the part of the entire , which cannot be permitted."
-
"Judges, while discharging their duties on the Bench, are in a state of temporary adoption, and continue to remain part of the larger judicial family, which includes the Bar."
-
"We note with regret that despite the fact that detailed directions have been issued, in order to assuage the apprehension of the Members of the Bar... a concocted projection is sought to be made."
Looking Ahead
While representatives from the and the agreed that the newly issued administrative measures effectively address the concerns surrounding the LADC system, a resolution to the ongoing strike remains elusive. Refuting claims that their previous oral directions were misapplied or misunderstood, the Court has granted further time for deliberations among the legal fraternity, scheduling the matter for a follow-up hearing on . The Court continues to advocate for an amicable resolution, maintaining that the restoration of services for the common litigant remains the objective of the highest priority.
