Case Law
Subject : Service Law - Land Acquisition
Jabalpur, M.P. – The Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Jabalpur Bench, has delivered a significant ruling in favor of numerous individuals whose lands were acquired by the West Central Railway, affirming that they cannot be retroactively denied employment based on a 2019 policy change. The bench, comprising Hon’ble Shri Justice Akhil Kumar Srivastava (Judicial Member) and Hon’ble Smt. Mallika Arya (Administrative Member), held that the eligibility for employment assistance is determined by the date of land acquisition, not the date of the policy's implementation.
The Tribunal heard a large batch of Original Applications filed by individuals, including Surendra Kumar Gautam, whose lands were acquired by the Railways for various projects. Under a Railway Board policy dated July 16, 2010, individuals who lost their land for railway projects were entitled to be considered for employment in the Railways as a form of rehabilitation, in addition to monetary compensation.
The applicants' claims for employment were either rejected or not considered by the Railways, citing a new policy circular (RBE No.193/2019) issued on November 11, 2019. This new policy explicitly withdrew the provision of offering jobs to land losers, superseding all previous circulars on the matter.
The central issue before the Tribunal was whether the 2019 policy, which discontinued employment assistance, could be applied to cases where the land acquisition process was completed before the policy was issued on November 11, 2019.
The Tribunal found the Railways' argument untenable. It highlighted a crucial clause within the 2019 policy itself to support its conclusion.
Pivotal Judgment Excerpt:
"Para 5 of the RBE No.193/2019 clearly states that the policy shall be effective from the date of its issuance, meaning thereby, the persons whose land was acquired after issuance of RBE No.193/2019, shall be governed by the said policy."
The bench observed that the policy's own text limits its application to future acquisitions. It further relied on its own established precedent in similar cases, which had been upheld by higher courts. The Tribunal cited its decision in Original Application No.200/275/2021 , which was later affirmed by the High Court of Chhattisgarh in WPS No.5804 of 2022 . The High Court had unequivocally stated:
"Clause 5 of the policy, however, makes it amply clear that the new policy shall be effective from the date of the issue of the letter. Therefore, there is no manner of doubt that the earlier policy which was withdrawn continued to remain in force till issuance of the notification dated 11.11.2019."
Based on this clear legal position, the CAT allowed the applications and set aside the rejection orders issued by the Railways. The Tribunal issued the following directions:
The Tribunal clarified that this order does not create an absolute right to employment. Applicants must still meet all other eligibility criteria, such as age and educational qualifications, at the time their cases were considered. The ruling explicitly does not apply to any cases where land was acquired after November 11, 2019.
#ServiceLaw #LandAcquisition #RailwayJobs
Delayed Registration of Birth Certificate Without Statutory Compliance Is Not Proof of Minority: Sikkim High Court
12 Jun 2026
Personal Participation in Contract Work Creates Employer-Employee Tie Under Employees Compensation Act: Kerala High Court
12 Jun 2026
Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Rajya Sabha Nomination Rejection
12 Jun 2026
Insufficient Evidence to Prove Minority or Kidnapping: Gujarat High Court Acquits Two in Atrocity Act Case
29 Jan 2026
Ex-Parte Order Without Notice or Jurisdiction Constitutes 'Gross Abuse of Process': Rajasthan High Court
15 Jun 2026
Mandatory Administrative Enquiry Precedes FIR Against Public Servants Under SC/ST Act: Uttarakhand High Court
16 Jun 2026
Assigning Administrative Charges to Tainted Officials Violates Natural Justice: MP High Court Quashes PWD Order
16 Jun 2026
Outsourced Employees Lack Right to Promotion; Unauthorized Designation Upgrades Are Legally Void: Uttarakhand High Court
16 Jun 2026
Calcutta HC Questions Speaker’s Power to Appoint LoP
16 Jun 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.