Back
Probes And CCTV Failure
The has taken cognizance of a troubling incident at the involving the suspicious death of notorious Chambal dacoit Jagan Gurjar. The court, presided over by Acting Chief Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma and Justice Maneesh Sharma, has launched a probe into the failure of jail security, specifically zeroing in on the performance of in-house surveillance systems.
A Death Behind Bars Jagan Gurjar, a well-known figure within the criminal landscape of the Chambal region, was found dead under suspicious circumstances within the confines of the . The incident has prompted to ensure state accountability regarding and the transparency of prison administration.
The court has expressed deep concern not merely over the death itself, but over the apparent negligence regarding prison security infrastructure, specifically highlighting "hazy" or "inoperative" CCTV cameras that were meant to monitor activity in sensitive areas.
Judicial Scrutiny of Prison Security During the recent hearing, the bench demanded a comprehensive explanation from both the State and High Court legal representatives. The court’s inquiry is multi-faceted:
- Why were the cameras inoperative or capturing unclear footage during the time of the incident?
- Why did the officer responsible for monitoring the surveillance feed fail to raise an alarm or report the malfunction immediately?
Acting Chief Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma and Justice Maneesh Sharma underscored the gravity of these lapses. They have directed the Additional Advocate General to submit a concerning general jail administration, while also tasking the with providing a report based on personal inspections of the facility.
Key Observations The court’s order reflects a demand for immediate transparency and accountability:
"The High Court shall also place the report relating to the incident which has occurred recently at the Central Jail at Ajmer and as to how the cameras have been found to be inoperative/ or hazy and why the concerned Officer who is required to keep a vigil on the cameras did not report about the said incident."
"Theshall also submit a copy of the report which he has prepared after personally inspecting the various stages and learned Additional Advocate General shall submit his response."
Moving Forward The court has scheduled the next hearing for . This case marks a critical juncture for prison oversight in Rajasthan. By demanding an audit of security protocols and technical infrastructure, the High Court is signaling that the failure of surveillance at the expense of inmate life will not be treated as a mere administrative oversight. The forthcoming reports from the state and the are expected to provide foundational evidence for potential systemic reforms in how Rajasthan's correctional facilities operate and are monitored.
