Back
RSS Not a Political Party: Karnataka Tribunal Stays Teacher's Suspension for Attending Sangh Event
In a significant , the has stayed the suspension of a government school teacher who was penalized for participating in a programme. The bench, comprising Judicial Member S.Y. Watawati and Administrative Member Dr. Amita Prasad, held that the RSS is not a political party and that mere attendance at its event does not violate service conduct rules.
Case Background
The applicant, Sri Gururaj, an Assistant Teacher at Government Girls High School in Hunasagi, Yadgiri district, was placed under suspension on , pending enquiry. The suspension order cited his participation in an RSS function held on — a Sunday — as misconduct under . Gururaj did not dispute his attendance but argued that the RSS is not a political party and that no specific government order barred government servants from attending its programmes.
Arguments Presented
The State contended that the teacher's involvement in RSS activities amounted to taking part in politics, violating (1), which prohibits government servants from being associated with any political party or organization that takes part in politics. The respondent authorities maintained that the RSS is a political organization, and thus participation attracted disciplinary action.
Gururaj's counsel countered that the RSS is a socio-cultural organization working for national character-building through shakhas and seva, and that no government notification had ever designated it a political party. They further pointed out that the event took place on a holiday and that , which the suspension order relied upon, had been omitted from the Conduct Rules since .
Legal Analysis
The Tribunal scrutinized of the , which states:
"No Government Servant shall be a member of or be otherwise associated with, any political party or any organization which takes part in politics nor shall he take part in, subscribe in aid of, or assist in any other manner, any political movement or activity."
The bench observed that the alleged act of the applicant was participation in an event organized by an association — the RSS. Since the RSS is not a political party and the State had not issued any specific order or notification prohibiting government officials from participating in such events, the act did not violate . The Tribunal also noted that the reference to in the impugned order was invalid because that provision had been omitted decades earlier.
This finding aligns with a broader national trend. In , the Union Government removed a 58-year-old restriction on Central Government employees associating with the RSS, a move already mirrored by states like Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, and Chhattisgarh.
Key Observations
The Tribunal recorded its pivotal reasoning in the order:
"When he participated in the event organized by a non-political party, the act of the applicant did not violate the conditions stipulated under
of the Conduct Rules, 2021."
"Further, the State Government has not issued any order or notification prohibiting any Government Official from participating in such an event."
"If there had been any specific order issued by the Government barring the Government Servant from participating in an event organized by such an association, then only it would have amounted to a violation of the Conduct Rules."
Court's Decision
Finding that Gururaj had made out a case, the Tribunal stayed the operation of the suspension order dated , until the next date of hearing on . The matter remains pending, but the establishes a clear principle: government servants cannot be automatically presumed to have violated conduct rules merely by attending an RSS programme, as the Sangh is not a political party under the governing service regulations. The decision underscores that disciplinary action requires a specific legal basis and cannot rely on assumptions about an organization's character.
