SC Collegium Recommends Justice Sanjay K Agrawal as Rajasthan High Court Chief Justice Amid Row

The Supreme Court Collegium, in a pivotal meeting on August 31, 2026, recommended Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal, a judge of the Chhattisgarh High Court, for appointment as the Chief Justice of the Rajasthan High Court. The recommendation comes amidst a storm of controversy surrounding the High Court's Acting Chief Justice, Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, following serious allegations of administrative misconduct raised by a sitting Supreme Court judge.

A Collegium in Motion: Three High Courts See New Chief Justice Recommendations

In a single resolution, the Collegium—led by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and comprising Justices Vikram Nath, B.V. Nagarathna, M.M. Sundresh, and P.S. Narasimha—moved to fill the top judicial posts for three High Courts. Alongside Justice Agrawal's nomination for Rajasthan, the Collegium recommended Justice Alpesh Yeshvant Kogje of the Gujarat High Court as Chief Justice of the Madhya Pradesh High Court, and Justice Dr. Pushpendra Singh Bhati of the Rajasthan High Court as Chief Justice of the Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court.

The Collegium also recommended the immediate transfer of Justice Agrawal to the Rajasthan High Court pending his formal elevation, a procedural move designed to ensure he joins as the senior-most judge there without delay. In a separate resolution, Justice Krushna Ram Mohapatra of the Orissa High Court was recommended as Chief Justice of the Chhattisgarh High Court, succeeding the incumbent who retires on September 4, 2026.

The Storm at the Rajasthan High Court

The recommendation for a regular Chief Justice for the Rajasthan High Court is far from routine. It follows an explosive series of letters sent to the Chief Justice of India by Supreme Court judge Justice Sandeep Mehta, who was himself elevated from the Rajasthan High Court.

Justice Mehta, in three letters dated August 2, August 10, and August 17, 2026, leveled serious allegations against Acting Chief Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma. The Supreme Court judge accused Justice Sharma of “favouritism” and misconduct in the exercise of his administrative powers and in the listing of cases. Justice Mehta explicitly urged the CJI to appoint a regular Chief Justice from another High Court—a call the Collegium has now answered.

The crisis deepened as lawyers at both the Jaipur and Jodhpur benches of the Rajasthan High Court launched protests, demanding that Justice Sharma be divested of his charge. In a dramatic turn, Justice Sharma subsequently opted out of judicial work, with a roster finalized on August 30 not assigning him any regular sittings from September 1 to September 5. His retirement is scheduled for September 26.

Institutional Response from the Apex Court

Chief Justice of India Surya Kant had previously acknowledged the situation publicly, issuing a statement on the same day the letters became public. He assured that the Collegium would consider Justice Mehta’s allegations through an “institutional mechanism.” The August 31 resolution is the direct outcome of that process.

The recommendation now moves to the Central government, which will process it in accordance with the Memorandum of Procedure governing the appointment and transfer of High Court judges. Once cleared, Justice Agrawal will take over as the regular Chief Justice of the Rajasthan High Court, drawing this chapter of administrative turmoil to a close.