Transfer of Judges
Subject : Legal
The Supreme Court collegium has recommended to the Union government to transfer Justices Sujoy Paul, of the Madhya Pradesh High Court, and Moushumi Bhattacharya, of the Calcutta High Court, to the Telangana High Court.
The SC Collegium comprising Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud, Justice Sanjiv Khanna, Justice B.R. Gavai, Justice Surya Kant and Justice Aniruddha Bose approved the resolutions regarding the transfer requests made by the judges.
Justice Sujoy Paul was born in 1964 and enrolled as an advocate in 1990 with the Madhya Pradesh High Court, practising multiple specialisations. He was appointed the additional judge of the MP HC on May 27, 2011, and appointed a permanent judge on April 14, 2014. He sought a transfer out of Madhya Pradesh citing his son practising as a lawyer in the state’s HC. Justice Paul is the third seniormost judge from the HC.
Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya was born in 1967, completed her law course in 1996 and enrolled as an advocate in 1997. She did her LLM at the University of Cambridge, on a Rotary Ambassadorial Scholarship. She was awarded a certificate of qualification by the National Committee on Accreditation, Canada. She practised in the Calcutta High Court, as well as the Supreme Court of India, the High Courts of Delhi, Patna and Telangana, the Company Law Board, the Debt Recovery Tribunal, and Securities and Exchange Board of India.
She was elevated as an additional judge of the Calcutta High Court on September 21, 2017, and appointed a permanent judge in 2019. Justice Bhattacharya requested the SC Collegium to transfer her from the Calcutta High Court to any other High Court for personal reasons. The SC Collegium acceded to their requests and resolved to recommend the same to the Union government for necessary steps.
Judicial transfer - Telangana High Court - Supreme Court Collegium - Justice Sujoy Paul - Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya - Madhya Pradesh High Court - Calcutta High Court - Transfer of judges - Judicial appointments
#JudicialTransfers #TelanganaHighCourt #SupremeCourtCollegium
Vague 'Bad Work' Can't Presume Penetrative Sexual Assault Under POCSO Section 4 Without Evidence: Patna High Court
28 Apr 2026
Limiting Crop Damage Compensation to Specific Wild Animals Excluding Birds Violates Article 14: Bombay HC
28 Apr 2026
Appeal Limitation in 1991 Police Rules Yields to Uttarakhand Police Act 2007 on Inconsistency: Uttarakhand HC
28 Apr 2026
Nashik Court Reserves Verdict on Khan's TCS Bail Plea
29 Apr 2026
Delhi Court Grants Bail to I-PAC Director in PMLA Case
30 Apr 2026
No Historic Record of Saraswati Temple Demolition, Muslim Body Tells MP High Court in Bhojshala Dispute
30 Apr 2026
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.