Back
Bail
Subject : Legal
The Supreme Court on Friday directed all courts to ensure that no litigant suppresses facts while seeking bail. A bench of Justices S.K. Kaul and A.S. Oka said that courts should mention details of previous bail applications and orders in all bail pleas. The bench was hearing a plea filed by advocate Prashant Bhushan, who had challenged the grant of bail to Alt News co-founder Mohammed Zubair by the Allahabad High Court. Bhushan had argued that the high court had failed to consider the fact that Zubair had been granted bail in a similar case by the Supreme Court earlier. The bench agreed with Bhushan's contention and said that courts should take into account all relevant factors while considering bail applications. The bench also said that courts should not grant bail to accused persons who have a history of suppressing facts. The bench's order is a significant development as it will help to ensure that courts do not grant bail to accused persons who are trying to hide their criminal history. It will also help to prevent courts from being misled by accused persons who are trying to suppress facts in order to obtain bail.
bail - litigant - suppression of facts - verification of antecedents - possibility of fleeing from justice - tampering with evidence - nature and gravity of offence - character of evidence - possibility of committing similar offences - cumulative consideration of factors - seriousness of offence - history of criminal offences - likelihood of committing similar offences - failure to consider relevant factors - dismissal of bail application - imposition of conditions - surrender of passport - regular appearance before court - prohibition on leaving country without permission - prohibition on contacting victim or victim's family - prohibition on committing similar offences - payment of bond - deposit of money with court - undergoing counselling - undergoing drug testing - wearing of electronic monitoring device - stay at particular address - prohibition on using social media - prohibition on using mobile phone - prohibition on using computer - prohibition on using internet - prohibition on using vehicle - prohibition on using firearm - prohibition on using passport - prohibition on using visa - prohibition on using driver's license - prohibition on using credit card - prohibition on using debit card - prohibition on using bank account - prohibition on using social security number - prohibition on using tax identification number
Vague 'Bad Work' Can't Presume Penetrative Sexual Assault Under POCSO Section 4 Without Evidence: Patna High Court
28 Apr 2026
Limiting Crop Damage Compensation to Specific Wild Animals Excluding Birds Violates Article 14: Bombay HC
28 Apr 2026
Appeal Limitation in 1991 Police Rules Yields to Uttarakhand Police Act 2007 on Inconsistency: Uttarakhand HC
28 Apr 2026
Nashik Court Reserves Verdict on Khan's TCS Bail Plea
29 Apr 2026
Delhi Court Grants Bail to I-PAC Director in PMLA Case
30 Apr 2026
No Historic Record of Saraswati Temple Demolition, Muslim Body Tells MP High Court in Bhojshala Dispute
30 Apr 2026
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
