AI Overview

AI Overview...

  • Political Pensions - The criteria for defining a political pension are derived from key cases such as (1879) ILR 4 Bom and Bishambhar Nath's case (1890) 17 Ind App 181 (PC). These cases clarify the nature and legal understanding of political pensions, emphasizing their contractual and sovereign guarantees SAHIB ZADA ADBUL BAIS KHAN VS BUDH SINGH BAPNA - Rajasthan.

  • Nawab Imdad Ali Khan - In (1890) 17 Ind App 181 (PC), Lord Watson highlighted that government-guaranteed pensions, especially those secured through treaties with other sovereigns, are considered in a strict legal sense as obligations of the government, potentially involving treaty obligations Raghunathrao Ganpatrao: Srikanta Datta Narasimharaja Wodiyar VS Union Of India - Supreme Court.

  • Legal Principles from Cases - The cases collectively establish that pensions guaranteed by the government, especially under treaties, are legally significant and involve contractual obligations. The nature of such pensions, their enforceability, and their classification have been discussed in various judgments, including those involving property disputes, transfers, and trust law SAHIB ZADA ADBUL BAIS KHAN VS BUDH SINGH BAPNA - Rajasthan, Raghunathrao Ganpatrao: Srikanta Datta Narasimharaja Wodiyar VS Union Of India - Supreme Court.

  • Property and Land Disputes - Several cases, such as Bitto Kunwar v. Kesho Prasad and Dinomoni Chowdhrani, deal with issues related to property transfers, forgery, fictitious transactions, and mortgage disputes under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890. These cases illustrate the legal procedures and evidentiary considerations in property disputes involving forged documents or fictitious transactions Baidya Nath Dutt VS Alef Jan Bibi - Calcutta.

  • Application to Specific Cases - The judgments also include discussions on the applicability of earlier rulings, such as the restrictions in (1872-73) 9 Beng LR 377, and the legal standing of transfers by will, as seen in Mancharam v. Pran. These cases emphasize the importance of proper legal procedures and the validity of transfers in property law K. Manathunainatha Desikar VS Sundaralingam (minor represented by his next friend M. Swaminathan) - Madras.

  • Decrees and Time Bar - In Ramditta Mal (1933), the Court examined issues related to the abatement of appeals, execution of decrees, and the bar of limitation, highlighting procedural aspects in executing decrees and the importance of timely actions RABIA BIBI VS . MOHAMMADI BIBI - Allahabad.

  • Miscellaneous Legal Principles - Other cases, such as Maharanee Sudhao Kooer and Janki Kuer, discuss the binding nature of previous proceedings, the legal effect of prior judgments, and the principles governing trust and title in property law Shyam Sunder Prasad Singh VS State Of Bihar - Supreme Court.

Analysis and Conclusion:
The sources collectively emphasize that legal principles governing pensions, property transfers, and disputes are rooted in established case law, particularly focusing on contractual obligations, treaty guarantees, and procedural correctness. The landmark case (1890) 17 Ind App 181 (PC) is pivotal in understanding the legal nature of government-guaranteed pensions, framing them as contractual obligations with sovereign implications. These cases reinforce the importance of procedural adherence, evidentiary standards, and the legal validity of transfers and decrees within Indian law.

Search Results for "1890 17 Ind App 181 Pc"

SAHIB ZADA ADBUL BAIS KHAN VS BUDH SINGH BAPNA

1972 0 Supreme(Raj) 157 India - Rajasthan

B.P.BERI, M.L.JOSHI

... ( 27 ) THE aforesaid cases lead us to the conclusion that the ingredients of a political pension can be safely gleaned from two cases namely (1879)ILR 4 Bom case and Bishambhar Naths case (1890) 17 Ind APP 181 (PC ). ... Nawab Imdad Ali Khan. (1890) 17 Ind app 181 (PC ). Usmanali Khan v. Sagar Mal. AIR 1965 SC 1798; muthuasami Naidu v. Prince Alagia Manavala Simmala Raja. (1903) ILR 26 Mad 423; Ladhmi Narain v.....

Raghunathrao Ganpatrao: Srikanta Datta Narasimharaja Wodiyar VS Union Of India

1993 0 Supreme(SC) 106 India - Supreme Court

B. P. JEEVAN REDDY, L. M. SHARMA, S. MOHAN, S. P. BHARUCHA, S. R. PANDIAN

Nawab lmdad Ali Khan, (1890 LR 17 Ind App 181, 186, Lord Watson observed : ... "A pension which the Government of India has given a guarantee that it will pay, by a treaty obligation contracted with another sovereign power, appears to their Lordships to be, in the strictest sense, a ... Karnani Industrial Bank Ltd., (4 (1931) LR 58 Ind App 215, 219 and 220 and in Bishambhar Nath v. ... ... 17. Clause (22) of Art. 366 was amended by Section 4 of the....

SOVABATI DASSI VS KASHI NATH DEY

1971 0 Supreme(Cal) 209 India - Calcutta

MASUD

Ravi Vurmah, (1876) 4 Ind App 76 (PC ). ... Mukherjee J. on the Hindu Law of Religious and Charitable Trust (third edition) pages 169. 177. 181 and 183, Gos-sami Sree Girdharjee v. Romanlal-jee Gossami, (1888) 16 Ind App ]37 (144) (PC) and Sm. Angurbala Mallik v. Debabrata Mallick. ... Haridas Bundopadhya (1890) ILR 17 Cal 557. (h) The transfer of a shebaiti right by will has also been held valid in law even in favour of a possible successor shebait: Mancharam v. Pran....

Baidya Nath Dutt VS Alef Jan Bibi

1922 0 Supreme(Cal) 461 India - Calcutta

CUMING, ASUTOSH MOOKERJEE

Property Dispute - Landed Property - Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 - Conveyance - Forgery - Fictitious Transactions - Mortgage ... P.C.J. 530 : Ind. Dec. 355 (P.C.) Bitto Kunwar v. Kesho Prasad 24 I.A. 10 : 19 A. 277 : 7 Sar. P.C.J. 131 : 1 C.W.N. 265 : 9 Ind. Dec. 181 (P.C.) Dinomoni Chowdhrani v. Brojo Mchini Chowdhrani 29 I.A. 24 : 29 C. 187 : 6 C.W.N. 380 : 12 M.L.J. 83 : 4 Bom. L.R. 167 : 8 Sar. P.C.J. 224 (P.C.) ... K.B. 985 : 85 L.T. 264 : 49 W.R. 673 : 17 T.L.R. 689. ... Cormican (1878) 3 #HL_ST....

K. Manathunainatha Desikar VS Sundaralingam (minor represented by his next friend M. Swaminathan)

1970 0 Supreme(Mad) 21 India - Madras

K.VEERASWAMI, NATESAN, SOMASUNDARAM

Ganendramohan Tagore, (1872-73) 9 Beng LR 377 : 1872 Ind App Supp Vol. 47 (PC) are applicable. ... Issues: (1) Whether the restrictions laid down in (1872-73) 9 Beng LR 377 : 1872 Ind App Supp Vol. 47 are applicable to the ... Ganendramohan Tagore, (1872-73) 9 Beng LR 377 : 1872 Ind App Supp Vol. 47 (PC) are applicable. (2) The plaintiff is barred from agitating ... ... 17. In Greedharee's case, (1867) 11 Moo Ind. ... Nundokissore Dass Mohant, (186....

RABIA BIBI VS . MOHAMMADI BIBI

1960 0 Supreme(All) 20 India - Allahabad

M.C.DESAI, B.UPADHYA, B.N.NIGAM

Ramditta Mal, 60 Ind App 83: (AIR 1933 PC 68), a decree was passed by the trial court on 17-11-1920, it was appealed against, the appeal abated on or about 11-8-1924, the appellate court on 18-10-1924 held that it had abated and it was held by the judicial Committee that the application for execution ... On 17-10-1955 the respondent applied for execution of the decree and the appellants challenged its maintainability on the ground that it was barred by time. ... Kirpal Shah, (S) AIR 1955 Punj 181, Kapur....

Union Of India VS Mahadeolal Prabhu Dayal

1965 0 Supreme(SC) 52 India - Supreme Court

K.N.WANCHOO, J.R.MUDHOLKAR, S.M.SIKRI

Secy. of State for India in Council, 64 Ind App 176 and the law on the subject was laid down thus at pp. 181-182 (of Ind App): ... "The first portion of the proviso provides that the Railway Administration shall be bound to disclose to the consignor how the consignment was dealt with ... IX of 1890, (hereinafter referred to as the Act), in asmuch as notice required therein was not given by the respondent. ... We may point out that in Surat Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd. s case....

Satyapramoda Thirthaswamulavaru VS Mula Gunnayya (deceased)

1981 0 Supreme(AP) 148 India - Andhra Pradesh

CHENNAKESAVA REDDY, S.MADHUSUDAN RAO

No. 17 of 1908. ... Sub-section (2) of Sec. 17 only exempts decrees and orders which fall within cls. ... No. 17/1908, does not bind the plaintiff ? 5. Whether the plaintiff holds the patta for the suit lands ? 6. ... Patanna (1918) 45 Ind App 209: (AIR 1918 PC 169) held that in the absence of evidence of the terms of inam grant made by a native ruler, there is no presumption that the grant was only of a Royal Revenue from the land and not of the soil. Again in Nainapallai Marakayar v. ... Ramanathan Ch....

Shyam Sunder Prasad Singh VS State Of Bihar

1980 0 Supreme(SC) 293 India - Supreme Court

A.P.SEN, E.S.VENKATARAMIAH, P.N.BHAGWATI

Maharanee Sudhao Kooer (1877) 4 Ind App 228. ... Janki Kuer (1902) ILR 29 Cal 828 : 29 Ind App 178. ... Atchama, (1846) Ind App 1, 97 and Sir James Colvile's statement in Collector of Madura v. Moottoo Ramlinga Sathupathy, (1868) 12 Moo Ind App 397, 437, stated thus :- ... "To call it (i.e. ... Trilokinath Singh (1885) 11 Ind App 197 holding that the previous proceedings were binding on Trilokinath Singh. ... Krish....

State of Orissa VS Minaketan Patnaik

1952 0 Supreme(Ori) 77 India - Orissa

JAGANNADHA DAS, PANIGRAHI, NARASIMHAM

Benorilal Sarma, AIR 1945 PC 48: 72 Ind App 57 (PC) (Y) and -Emperor v. Sibnath Banerjee, AIR 1945 PC 156 : 72 Ind App 241 (PC) (Z). In the first case, the appeal to the Privy Council was against an acquittal of the accused by the High Court confirmed by the Federal Court. ... The report shows that a question arose therein as to whether in the case of an yearly tenancy commencing on 19-5-1890, a notice given on 17-11-1893, to quit and to deliver up possession of the premises on 19th Ma....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top