MASUD
SOVABATI DASSI – Appellant
Versus
KASHI NATH DEY – Respondent
( 1 ) THE important point to be decided in this suit is whether a sole shebait can lawfully alienate his right to shebaitship by will under Daya-bhaga School of Hindu Law. The facts of the case may be briefly stated as follows:
( 2 ) THE settler of a deed of endowment, Kashinath Dey, died in 1902 leaving his widow Sm. Jhanobi Moni Dassi and a son Pulin Behari Dey. Pu-lin Behari Dey died a few years after the death of Kashinath Dey, as stated by Mr. Dipankar Ghosh on behalf of the defendant and not objected to by Mr. Debi De on behalf of the plaintiff, leaving Kalicharan Dey as his sole heir. Kalicharan died on December 20, 1958 leaving Kashinath Dey, the present defendant, being the adopted son of Kalicharan. Kalicharan had a natural son Panchugopal who died in May 1933. Kalicharan left a will dated November 21, 1958 whereby he appointed the defendant as the sole shebait. The material portions of the Deed of Settlement dated September 22, 1884 are stated below:". . . . . Also witnesseth that In consideration of the premises the said Kassi Nath Dey (Doth) hereby appoint his wife the said Shreemutty Jhanobee Monee Dassi to be the sole sabait of the said Idol Sree Sree Iswa
Peary Mohan Mukherjee v. Monohar Mukherjee
Sm.Angurbala Mallik v. Debabrata Mallick
Muthu Kumaraswami v. Subbaraya
Pran Krishna Das v. Controller of Estate Duty, West Bengal
Commr. Hindu Religion Endowments v. Shri Lakshmindra Thirtha Swamiar
Hemanta Kumar v. Prafulla Kumar
Sankatha Pandey v. Brij Mohan Pandey
Bhabatarini Debi v. Ashalata Debi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.