AI Overview...
-
1976 SCC 289 (Pratap Narain Singh Deo v. Srinivas Sabata) - The case establishes that compensation is considered due only after settlement by the appropriate authority (Commissioner). It emphasizes that legal rights and obligations related to compensation depend on the specific facts and statutory provisions applicable at the time of the case. The judgment is a significant precedent in understanding the timing and conditions under which compensation becomes payable reference: 1976 SCC 289.
-
Legal Definition and Application of Law - Several sources clarify that laws are defined under section 2(f) of relevant acts, and that the old laws continue to apply in certain regions until new laws are enacted by the respective states. This principle ensures legal continuity during administrative reorganization, with Parliament retaining authority to enact laws on the same matters at any time references: 02500001183, [U. P. Bank Employees Credit Cooperative Society, Ltd. Jugal Kishore Agarwal VS State of U. P
-
Allahabad](https://supremetoday.ai/doc/judgement/02500040768).
-
Evidence and Testimony - The Supreme Court has reiterated that the testimony of injured witnesses holds special weight in criminal cases, as seen in recent decisions like Baleshwar Mahto & Anr. v. State of Bihar & Anr. (2017). Such testimony is considered crucial for establishing facts, especially in cases involving violence or disputes reference: 01000011405.
-
Landlord and Property Laws - The case of Director of Consolidation and Hari Shankar Singhania emphasizes that courts have concurrently found bona fide needs of landlords under Section 13(3)(a)(i) of the relevant Act, and that such findings are based on facts specific to each case. The applicability of judgments depends on fact similarity, and courts have upheld the bona fide need as a valid ground for eviction references: 01800030055.
-
Insurance and Compensation Cases - In cases like Mubasir Ahmed and Kamala Chaturvedi, the courts have relied on precedents to interpret the law relating to insurance claims and compensation, emphasizing that legal principles established in earlier judgments guide decisions in subsequent cases, especially regarding the binding nature of findings and statutory interpretations references: 00300026349, Rasheed Ahmad Usmani VS DLF Ltd. (through its Chairman & MD) DLF Centre - Consumer.
Analysis and Conclusion:
The 1976 case SCC 289 is a landmark judgment that clarifies the conditions under which compensation becomes due, emphasizing the importance of statutory procedures and factual context. It continues to serve as a key reference for understanding legal timelines and obligations related to compensation and damages. The principles from this case, along with other cited judgments, reinforce the importance of factual accuracy, statutory compliance, and the special status of injured witnesses in criminal law. Overall, these cases collectively highlight the judicial approach to law continuity, evidence evaluation, and specific legal provisions relevant to property, compensation, and procedural law.
Search Results for "1976 1scc 289 Case Law"
2024 0 Supreme(Chh) 478 • India - Chhattisgarh
ARVIND KUMAR VERMA
(Paras 1-20) Facts of the case: The appellant was convicted for stabbing the victim during a dispute, resulting ... With respect to the evidence of victim, recently the Supreme Court in Criminal Appeal Nos. 513-514 of 2014 decided on 09.01.2017 in case of Baleshwar Mahto & Anr. v. State of Bihar & Anr., has reiterated the law laid down in case of Abdul Sayeed v. ... The law on the point can be summarized to the effect that the testimony of the injured witness is accorded a special status in la....
2009 0 Supreme(Kar) 216 • India - Karnataka
A.N.VENUGOPALA GOWDA
of National Insurance Co Ltd Vs Mubasir Ahmed (Supra) and also in the case of Kamala Chaturvedi Vs National Insurance Company & Others (2009)1SCC (cri) 550. ... Precedents: - ... (i) In Pratap Narain Singh Deo Vs Srinivas Sabata And Another (1976) 1 SCC 289, a Judgment rendered by the Bench of four Hon'ble Judges, the contention canvassed was that, the compensation had not fallen due, until it was settled by the Commissioner ... Be that as it may, in view of the categorical law laid down by the larger ....
• India - Consumer
DEEPA SHARMA, C.VISWANATH
was in addition to the total price—Agreement for payment of taxes by the complainants, is not hit by any statutory provision of law ... complainants in the year 2009-2012 and they have not challenged the terms and conditions of this agreement before any Court of law—Complainants ... It is a settled proposition of law that the findings in a case are given on the facts of that case. The binding nature of the findings depends upon the similarity of facts. ... 34 IPC and Section 320, 321 & 321 (b) of the Ka....
2004 0 Supreme(All) 2060 • India - Allahabad
JAGDISH BHALLA, RAKESH SHARMA
Law is defined u/s 2 (f) of the said act. ... It has been held in this case that the old law as it stood before reorganization, shall continue to apply in the areas going out towards the newly created State until the own laws were made by newly created State by adaptation, modification etc. ... Provided thatprovided that nothing in this clause shall prevent Parliament from enactingfrom atenacting at any time any law with respect to the same mattersame matter including a law adding to, amending, varying ....
2004 0 Supreme(All) 2078 • India - Allahabad
RAKESH SHARMA, JAGDISH BHALLA
Law is defined u/s 2 (f) of the said act. ... It has been held in this case that the old law as it stood before reorganization, shall continue to apply in the areas going out towards the newly created State until the own laws were made by newly created State by adaptation, modification etc. ... Provided thatprovided that nothing in this clause shall prevent Parliament from enactingfrom atenacting at any time any law with respect to the same mattersame matter including a law adding to, amending, varying ....
2016 0 Supreme(HP) 2265 • India - Himachal Pradesh
CHANDER BHUSAN BAROWALIA
Director of Consolidation, (1976) 3 SCC 119 and Hari Shankar singhania vs. Gaur Hari Singhania, (2006) 4 SCC 658.” The judgment (supra) is also not applicable to the facts of the present case. ... Moreover, both the Courts below have concurrently found that the need of the landlord-respondent No. 1 is bona-fide and it has to be considered as covered by Section 13 (3) (a) (i) of the Act as interpreted by the Supreme Court in the case of Harbilas Rai Bansal vs. State of Punjab (1996) 1SCC 1. ... is permissible in #HL_START....
• India - National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
It is a settled proposition of law that the findings in a case are given on the facts of that case. The binding nature of the findings depends upon the similarity of facts. ... 34 IPC and Section 320, 321 & 321 (b) of the Karnataka Municipal Corporation Act 1976 and Section 76 (FFF) of the Karnataka Town & Country Planning Act, 1961. ... This commission in the case of Aaradhna Fabric Pvt. Ltd. vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. 2015 SCC online NCDRC 25 has considered this issue at length and after cons....
Filter by Legal Phrase
