Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Petitions & Court Proceedings - Multiple references (Kommineni Naga Sanjeeva Rao vs Kommineni Seetha Lakshmi - 2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 9201 - 2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 9201, Bokkisam Harika @ Vishnumolakala Harika vs Bokkisam Gopi - 2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 9634 - 2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 9634, Doddi Eswara Rao vs Maddala Rameswara Rao - 2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 7790 - 2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 7790, Bobbala Sambasiva Rao, Bobbala Pratima vs The State of Andhra Pradesh - 2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 8003 - 2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 8003, vankayalapati- Kiranmayee vs The State of Andhra Pradesh - 2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 10757 - 2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 10757, The Kanchikacherla Cultural, Recreational and Social Service Club vs The State of Andhra Pradesh - 2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 12238 - 2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 12238, Nalanda Educational Society vs The State of Andhra Pradesh - 2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 10355 - 2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 10355) detail hearings, perusals of petitions, affidavits, grounds, and prior orders by High Courts and subordinate courts, indicating ongoing judicial review processes across various cases. Arguments are heard by advocates and judicial officers, with notices issued to respondents to show cause or for further action. Various references
Legal Principles & Jurisdiction - Several sources (e.g., ORISSA PREVENTION OF LAND ENCROACHMENT ACT, 1972 - State of Orissa, through Collector, Sundargarh VS Daitari Sahu - Orissa; Ghamandi Rams case - GAURI SHANKAR VS KAPOOR CHAND - Rajasthan) highlight jurisdictional issues, especially regarding the applicability of special statutes, civil court jurisdiction, and statutory bars. Courts emphasize that even where special statutes impose restrictions, civil courts retain jurisdiction if statutory provisions are not complied with or disputes involve bona fide issues. State of Orissa, through Collector, Sundargarh VS Daitari Sahu - Orissa, GAURI SHANKAR VS KAPOOR CHAND - Rajasthan
Land & Property Disputes - Cases involve land encroachments, land donation, village naming, and mortgage rights (File No. F.15(126)RJ RERA C 2020 Suo Moto Versus (1)SNG Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. (2) BDI Group (Berry Developers Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.) - Real Estate Regulatory Authority_RERA_1150, GAURI SHANKAR VS KAPOOR CHAND - Rajasthan, State of Orissa, through Collector, Sundargarh VS Daitari Sahu - Orissa). The legal stance underscores the importance of proper statutory procedures, dispute resolution mechanisms, and the protection of property rights, including mortgage and usufructuary rights, with courts often directing further proceedings or notices. File No. F.15(126)RJ RERA C 2020 Suo Moto Versus (1)SNG Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. (2) BDI Group (Berry Developers Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.) - Real Estate Regulatory Authority, GAURI SHANKAR VS KAPOOR CHAND - Rajasthan
Criminal Law & Cases - Notable cases (Mohinder Singh VS State Of Punjab - Supreme Court) discuss murder convictions based on evidence like eyewitness testimonies, identification, and benefit of doubt, emphasizing the importance of credible evidence and legal standards for conviction. Cases also explore issues such as the status of public servants, hate speech, and child protection, reflecting ongoing legal debates around criminal liability and rights. Mohinder Singh VS State Of Punjab - Supreme Court, UnnaoRapeCase references
Environmental & Administrative Law - Writ petitions (Trishakti Stone Crushing Unit VS State of Orissa - Orissa) address violations of pollution norms and procedural irregularities in environmental enforcement, with courts noting the absence of legal grounds to challenge notices of closure issued by authorities. Trishakti Stone Crushing Unit VS State of Orissa - Orissa
Labor & Statutory Powers - The exercise of statutory powers by authorities like the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner is upheld, with courts clarifying that delays or disputes do not bar statutory actions if procedural requirements are met. Udaipur Sahkari Upbhogats Thok VS The Union of India (Uoi) - Rajasthan
Public Policy & Social Issues - Supreme Court rulings (2025122915593196b960, 20251229162431af0abb, 2025122917253802e295, 20251227160733e2dcf9, 20251227154533c777e2) address communal harmony, arbitrariness in land and village naming, contract disputes, mortgage rights, and child protection, emphasizing the importance of natural justice, public policy, and constitutional principles in adjudication.
Analysis and Conclusion: The sources collectively demonstrate the multifaceted nature of legal proceedings involving civil, criminal, environmental, and administrative law. Courts consistently emphasize adherence to statutory procedures, the importance of evidence, and the principles of natural justice. Ongoing cases reflect the judiciary's role in resolving disputes related to land, property, criminal liability, and public policy, ensuring justice while respecting statutory limits and constitutional rights.
Have you ever scanned a order and stumbled upon phrases like upon perusing the Petition or perusal of the pleadings? If your legal query starts with something like In this Perus, you're likely encountering a common fragment from court proceedings. This incomplete phrase often hints at the standard language used in Indian judicial documents, where or refers to the judge's careful review of filed papers before a hearing. In this blog, we'll break down this essential legal term, its context, and why it matters—drawing from real court examples and principles. Whether you're a litigant, lawyer, or just curious, understanding demystifies court orders.
In law, simply means a thorough examination or reading of documents. Courts use it to indicate that the judge has reviewed key filings—like petitions, affidavits, grounds, or prior orders—prior to hearing arguments. This step ensures informed decision-making and procedural fairness.
The term appears frequently in routine orders, signaling the petition coming on for hearing. For instance, it's not a deep analysis but a preliminary scan to grasp facts and issues. As seen in various proceedings, this practice upholds by confirming the court is appraised before oral submissions.
Key distinction: differs from full adjudication. It's preparatory, not conclusive. Courts may note what reveals, like discrepancies or clarity issues, influencing interim orders.
Indian court orders, especially from High Courts, standardize this language. Here's how it typically unfolds:
Standard Opening Phrase: The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and the earlier order of the ... and upon hearing the arguments... This sets the stage for decisions like issuing notices or granting interim relief.
Variations Across Cases: In criminal matters, judges perused the record after hearing counsel. In writ petitions, it's tied to directing notices: upon perusing the petition and affidavit... directed issue of notice.
Outcomes: Judges often highlight findings post-review. For example, Perusal of the pleadings as well as the documents annexed clearly reveal that the recording of the date of birth... has been tampered. Or, After perusing the FIR... a doubt arises as to veracity.
These examples span civil, criminal, and administrative cases, showing 's ubiquity. In ongoing matters, multiple prior orders are perused, like dates , , etc.
This routine appears in diverse dockets, from RERA disputes to Polycet counseling .
embodies procedural rigor, linking to broader principles:
Jurisdiction: Under , writs demand careful document scrutiny. Courts have broad scope but emphasize context.
Statutory Interpretation: aids , reading statutes in light of purpose.
In property disputes, uncovers encroachments or title issues, retaining civil court jurisdiction if statutes falter. GAURI SHANKAR VS KAPOOR CHAND - Rajasthan
Quote Highlight: A perusal of the same does not clearly reveal as to what was the correct date of birth... There is also no endorsement as to when such interpolation... was made. This shows spotting evidentiary gaps.
In criminal law, it tests FIR credibility: After perusing the FIR, Ext.2, a doubt arises as to veracity of the facts. Courts uphold convictions on trustworthy evidence post-.
Court perusals intersect with key areas:
Public policy cases stress , with ensuring fairness. Recent rulings reinforce this in communal harmony and contracts.
On Credibility: On perusal of the discharge journals/lists, he could identify the writings. On perusal of the same, we could not find anything to disbelieve this witness.
Sometimes, reveals ambiguities:- Tampered records without endorsements. - Implausible FIR narratives. - Nomination objections needing deeper scrutiny.
If documents lack clarity, courts may reject or seek clarification—highlighting 's limits without full evidence.
| Aspect | Role of ||--------|-----------------|| Preliminary | Document scan pre-hearing || Evidentiary | Spots tampering, doubts || Procedural | Ensures fairness under Art. 226 || Interpretive | Aids purposive reading |
is more than jargon—it's the gateway to judicial engagement in Indian courts. From writs to civil judgments, it underscores meticulous review, tying into jurisdiction , interpretation , and justice. While phrases like In this Perus may seem cryptic, they reflect standard practice across cases .
Disclaimer: This is general information based on common practices and cited documents. Legal outcomes vary by facts; consult a qualified lawyer for advice. Not specific to any case.
#LegalTerms, #CourtProcedures, #IndianLaw
Petition coming on for hearing, upon perus]'ng the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and the earlier order of the High Court dt ll.03.2024, 01.04.2024 ,12.07.2024 & 13.09.2024 & 13.ll.2024 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri A.K.KISHORE REDDY
No. 107 of 2024 on the file Of the Principal Senior Civil Judge at Bapatla, Guntur District The petition coming On for hearing, upon PeruS-lng the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and the order of the High Court dated o8.04.2025 & 09.05.2025 made herein and upon hearing the arguments
Perus Das 2.
petition coming on for hearing, upon perus-lng the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and the earlier order of the High Court dt. 1h`.
Ankit Bishnoi and havinlg perus
The petition coming on for hearing, upon perus]-ng the petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and the earlier orders of the High Court dated:16.06.2025, 23.06.2025, 30.06.2025, & 01.07.2025, made herein and upon hearing the arguments of M/s.
Heard tht: learned counsel for the petitioner/ accr.rsed, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing the respondent- State and perus,:d the record.
The Petition coming On for-`hearing, upon PeruS-lng the Petition and the memorandum of grounds filed in`support thereof and the earlier order of the High Court dated 04.01.2023, 20.12.2023, 01.02.2024, 12.04.2024, o9.08.2024 & 03.10.2024, 22.ll.2024 & 19.02.2025 made herein
AND WHEREAS the HJgh Court upon perus,'ng the pet,'tl'on and affldavl't filled here,'n and upon hearing the arguments of srI' GINJUPALL' SUBBA RAO Advocate for the petl-tIOner, dl|rected ISSue of notlce to the Respondents hereln to show cause as to why thl's WRIT PETITION should not
2 to 4 to forward the pet'ltione`r's institution to DTE for admissions for the academic year 2025-26 forthwith by adding the Petitioner Institution name in the Polycet Counseling process, Pending disposal of WP 15379 of 2025, on the file of the High Court. , The petition coming on for hearing, upon perus
A perusal of the same does not clearly reveal as to what was the correct date of birth of the petitioner. There is also no endorsement as to when such interpolation or correction was made. Perus¬al of the pleadings as well as the documents annexed clearly reveal that the recording of the date of birth made in the serv¬ice book has been tampered or overwritten.
Therefore the Tribunal rightly discarded the FIR, more so because P.W.2 who was the informant denied the contents thereof in Court. After perus¬ing the FIR, Ext.2, a doubt arises as to veracity of the facts narrated therein. Admittedly the accident occurred in the month of November, that too after a midnight. It sounds improbable that in the month of November, in the chilled hour after midnight, anybody would relish to sleep on the roof-top of a running bus.
Officer has been vested with power to examine the nomination and decide all objections and can reject any nomination on the grounds enumerated therein. A perus¬al of the same is of some importance for decision in this case.
Tripathy and signature of the petitioner and also stated that utilizing the 21 KVPs for the second time a sum of Rs.2,90,000/- has been misappropriated. Tripathy he was satisfied that the KVPs have been discharged twice. On perus¬al of the discharge journals/lists, he could identify the writ¬ings of P.
we have also read and thoroughly scanned the cross-examination part of the evidence of this witness. On perus¬al of the same, we could not find anything to disbelieve this witness. All through the testimony of this witness is found to be fully tustworthy.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
