AI Overview...
Summary of 1989 SCC Online Madras 61
- Main Points and Insights:
- The case pertains to issues of possession, property rights, and statutory mechanisms for resolution in the context of tenancy and property disputes within Tamil Nadu.
- The court examined the applicability of the Madras City Tenants Protection Act, 1921, emphasizing the importance of resolving disputes through statutory provisions rather than extrajudicial or informal means.
- The decision references the broader judicial principle that disputes over property and tenancy rights are best addressed via established legal frameworks, such as the relevant statutes and civil procedures.
- The case aligns with the judicial stance that courts should not overstep their jurisdiction, especially when statutory remedies are available and appropriate.
-
The judgment underscores the importance of respecting tenants' rights and the procedural safeguards provided under the law.
-
Analysis and Conclusion:
- The case reinforces the principle that property and tenancy disputes in Tamil Nadu are to be resolved through statutory channels, notably the Madras City Tenants Protection Act, 1921.
- Courts have consistently emphasized the need for adherence to legal procedures, avoiding interference beyond their jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution when statutory remedies are sufficient.
- The decision aligns with the broader jurisprudence that courts should facilitate the resolution of disputes within the framework of applicable laws, ensuring protection of tenants' rights while maintaining judicial restraint.
References: - 1989 SCC Online Madras 61 - Relevant judgments and legal principles cited in the case, including the emphasis on statutory resolution mechanisms and judicial restraint in property disputes.
Search Results for "1989 Scc Online Madras 61"
2022 0 Supreme(Pat) 533 • India - Patna
RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
Commissioner of Police, 1994 SCC Online Del 327; Vijay Khanna vs. Union of India, 1998 SCC Online Del 846; Waf Alalaulad vs. ... State of Bihar, 1996 SCC online PAT 378 : AIR 1996 PAT 163; Yar Mohammad vs. ... Usha Rani Rajgaria, 1992 (4) SCC 61; Roshina. T vs. ... Union of India reported in 1998 SCC Online Del 846 the Hon’ble Division Bench of Delhi High Court was examining a case in which restoration of possessio....
2019 0 Supreme(Mad) 2442 • India - Madras
R.SUBBIAH, C.SARAVANAN
The court also considered the rights of the 1st respondent under the Madras City Tenants Protection Act, 1921. ... Writ Petition - Possession of Leased Property - Madras City Tenants Protection Act, 1921 - [Article 226 of the Constitution of ... India, Madras City Tenants Protection Act, 1921, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Specific Relief Act] Fact of the Case: ... D.P.Francy Diana vs The Chief Engineer (Establishment) Tamil Nadu Electricity Board and Another, 2017 SCC OnLine Mad 10478. iv. Surya Cons....
2023 0 Supreme(Pat) 368 • India - Patna
RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
(2017) 10 SCC 1, 2011 SCC Online JACC 13 = (2011) 8 VCLR 61, (2007), 2 SCC 711, (1989) 2 SCC 574, (1993) 2 SCC 746, (1994) 1 SCC 243, (2000) 6 SCC 213, (1995) 3 SCC 42, (1997) 6 SCC 241, (1982) 3 SCC 235; S. Rangarajan vs. P. Jagjivan Ram reported in (1989)2SCC 574; Nilabati Behera vs. State of Orissa reported in (1993) 2SCC 746; Lucknow Develo....
2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 2050 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S.
beyond scope of Article 226 jurisdiction - Dispute over temple management to be resolved through statutory provisions under the Madras ... Findings of Court: ... The court found that the matters at hand are best addressed through statutory mechanisms laid down in the Madras ... Union of India [2018 SCC OnLine SC 667]. ... Union of India [(2018) 7 SCC 789 : 2018 SCC OnLine SC 667] - order dated 05.07.2018 in W.P. ... (C)No.649 of 2018 [2018 SCC #H....
2022 0 Supreme(Raj) 391 • India - Rajasthan
Commercial Tax Officer, 2019 SCC Online Ker. 355, Fortis Health Care Limited vs. State of Punjab, 2015 SCC Online P&H 2018. ... Union of India, (1989) 3 SCC 634 “subjects which in one aspect and for one purpose fall within the power of a particular legislature may in another aspect and for another purpose fall within another legislative power. ... In support of his submissions, learned counsels for the petitioner-Revenue relied upon the judgment of Madras High Court r....
2025 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 1205 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice M. NIRMAL KUMAR
2023 SCC OnLine All 1154 and Rajdhari Yadav v. State of U.P. 2022 SCC OnLine All 583 and Union of India v. ... Inspector of Excise and Others , 2019 SCC Online Ker 3685, hence the matter was referred to a Larger Bench by the Kerala High Court and the Kerala High Court in the case of Pradeep B. Vs. ... Now-a-days, it is through online almost all the transactions are carried out and hence, he needs his Mobile. 11. ... Tejinder Singh, 2023 SCC #HL_....
2024 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 82749 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
2023 KLT OnLine 1195 : 2023 SCC OnLine Ker. 1022] 3. In the writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner is that in total disregard to the directions issued by this Court in Muraleedharan M. ... Prabhu took charge as the Secretary of that Branch, as evident from Ext.R6(A) news report that appeared on 19.01.2021 in an online media called ‘Athavanad Media’. ... The Division Bench noticed that the Madras Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1951 , is enacted to provide for the better administr....
2025 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 1206 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice M.NIRMAL KUMAR
2023 SCC OnLine Gau 729 and following Sainaba Vs. State of Kerala , 2022 (7) KHC 273 held interim custody of a vehicle involved under the NDPS Act could be ordered. ... In sum and substance, he argued that any property say conveyance seized in NDPS Act cases cannot be returned as a matter of routine and it is only after satisfying Sections 60 , 61, 62, and 63 of the said Act. 7. ... (MD) No. 116 of 2024, dated 08.02.2024 wherein this Court, following the order passed in Nahoorkani's case (cited supra held that whenever a return of prop....
2021 0 Supreme(Del) 482 • India - Delhi
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI
Our view is elucidated appositely by the decision of the Hon’ble Madras High Court in Madasamy vs. Secretary to Govt. & Ors., reported as 2016 SCC OnLine Mad 20650 and in particular paragraphs 41 to 43 of the said report, wherein it was observed as under:- “41. ... Happy Dimple Dhakkad reported as 2019 (20) SCC 609. (x) Madasamy v. Pasumponpandian reported as 2016 SCC OnLine Mad 20650. (xi) Jeganath v. Principal Secretary reported as 2017 SCC OnLine ....
2025 0 Supreme(Mad) 3900 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice M. NIRMAL KUMAR
2023 SCC OnLine All 1154 and Rajdhari Yadav v. State of U.P. 2022 SCC OnLine All 583 and Union of India v. ... Inspector of Excise and Others , 2019 SCC Online Ker 3685, hence the matter was referred to a Larger Bench by the Kerala High Court and the Kerala High Court in the case of Pradeep B. Vs. ... Tejinder Singh, 2023 SCC OnLine Gau 729 and following Sainaba Vs. State of Kerala , 2022 (7) KHC 273 held interim custody of a vehicle involved ....
Filter by Legal Phrase
