AI Overview...
-
Supreme Court Decision on Documentation for Manufacturing - The Supreme Court affirmed that providing documentation services facilitates manufacturing activities, specifically in the context of manufacturing microscopes, and upheld the applicability of the judgment in Scientific Engineering House P. Ltd. to similar cases. Commissioner of Income Tax VS Asea Ltd - Bombay
-
Limitation and Arbitration Cases - The Court emphasized that issues related to limitation must be raised before the Arbitrator, citing the Supreme Court's ruling in Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd. v. M/s. Rani Construction, reinforcing procedural adherence in arbitration proceedings. Kusuma Constructions, Vijayawada VS Union of India, rep. by the General Manager, South Central Railay - Andhra Pradesh
-
Labour Court Findings and Challenges - The Supreme Court held that Labour Court's findings are not challengeable under Article 227 of the Constitution. It also clarified that claims based on existing rights can be contested if the existence of such rights is denied, referencing East India Coal Co. v. Labour Court Hubli. Tamil Nadu Corporation for Development of Women Co-operative Industrial Estate VS The Presiding Officer & Others - Madras
-
Insurance Contract and Third-Party Claims - The Supreme Court reversed a judgment favoring the insurer's obligation, stating that insurers are only liable concerning their contractual liability, and this judgment does not extend to third-party claimants. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMOANY LIMITED VS FIRST PARY NOT GIVEN - Gujarat
-
Employee Insurance and Statutory Coverage - The Court examined orders regarding the coverage of establishments under the Employees' State Insurance Act, emphasizing procedural challenges and the validity of coverage decisions made by authorities. TIRATH RAM AHUJA PRIVATE LIMITED VS DELHI ADMINISTRATION - Delhi
-
Definition of 'Mine' and Regulatory Clarifications - The Court criticized the DGMS's broad interpretation of 'mine,' asserting that it conflicted with statutory definitions and Supreme Court judgments, highlighting the importance of consistent legal interpretations. D. L. F. POWER LIMITED VS UNION OF INDIA - Jharkhand
-
Criminal Convictions and Legislative Principles - The Supreme Court rejected the argument that principles of non-applicability of certain provisions should extend to legislators, reaffirming that legislators can be considered a separate class, and upheld convictions based on relevant legal standards. Prabhu L. K. VS State of Kerala - Kerala
Analysis and Conclusion:
The sources collectively reinforce key principles established by the Supreme Court, including the importance of procedural adherence in arbitration, the limited scope of Labour Court decisions under constitutional provisions, and the need for consistent statutory interpretation, especially regarding definitions and obligations in regulatory and contractual contexts. These rulings underscore the Court's role in maintaining legal clarity and procedural integrity across various legal domains.
Search Results for "2002 Supreme 0 P and H 835"
2002 0 Supreme(All) 835 • India - Allahabad
VISHNU SAHAI, R.C.PANDEY
We direct that a copy of this judgment be sent by 17. 7. 2002 to : ... (i) Chief Secretary, Government of Uttar Pradesh; ... (ii) Principal Secretary (Home), Government, of Uttar Pradesh ; ... (iii) Secretary (Home), Government of Uttar Pradesh ;
2002 0 Supreme(Pat) 835 • India - Patna
RAVI S.DHAVAN, R.N.PRASAD
Letters Patent Appeal has been filed against the order of 1st July, 2002 in C.W.J.C. No. 5862/2002. ... 2. The appellant faced a certificate action for realisation of Rs. 11, 54, 640/- as penalty on excise not paid.
2002 0 Supreme(Bom) 835 • India - Bombay
S.H.KAPADIA, J.P.DEVADHAR
The Supreme Court answered that question in the affirmative and in favour of the assessee. The Supreme Court held that the purpose of giving such documentation service was to enable the assessee to undertake trading activity of manufacturing microscopes. ... In the circumstances, the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Scientific Engineering House P. Ltd. (supra) is squarely applicable to the facts of the case. ... Applying the ratio of this judgment of the Supreme Court to the facts of our case, the two authori....
2002 0 Supreme(AP) 835 • India - Andhra Pradesh
N.V.RAMANA
Counsel for the applicant has relied upon the decision of the Supreme Court in Thyssen Stahlunion gmbh v. Steel Authority of India Ltd, (1999 (3) arb. LR 532 (SC ). ... ... ( 7 ) SO far as the first contention regarding limitation is concerned, the Supreme Court in M/s. Konkan Railway Corpn Ltd. v. M/s. Rani Construction (P.) ... No. 41 of 2001 following the judgment of the Supreme Court in Konkan Railway corporation Ltd. (supra) wherein it was held that the question of limitation has also to be raised before the Arbitrator, and the nomi....
2002 0 Supreme(Raj) 835 • India - Rajasthan
N.P.GUPTA, B.PRASAD
Of course, the 1. 0. had denied the suggestion, but then, the fact remains that in Ex. P/4, the column is blank. Thus, in the totality of circumstances, I am not inclined to rely upon Ex. P/2 also as a version of victim Laxman, for the purpose and in the manner intended by the prosecution. ... P/2 cannot be taken to be as sacrosanct as is desired by the prosecution. 1. 0. was rather clearly suggested that all papers were subsequently prepared and day and time were put arbitrarily as may have suited the convenience, and therefore, it was in this process tha....
2002 0 Supreme(Mad) 835 • India - Madras
A.KULASEKARAN
... In this case, the Honourable Supreme Court has held that that the finding given by the Labour Court cannot be challenged under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. ... iii) EAST INDIA COAL CO. v. ... LABUR COURT HUBLI (1970(II) LLJ 51) wherein the Honourable Supreme Court has held that "... if the money or the benefit is claimed by a workman on the basis that the right already exists and the existence of that right is denied, it is competent for the Labour Court in proceeding under Section 33-C(2 ... ... In the above case, the Honourable #HL_STA....
2002 0 Supreme(Guj) 835 • India - Gujarat
B.J.SHETHNA, KUNDAN SINGH
The said judgment of the Division Bench of the J and K High Court was reversed by the Honble Supreme Court in an SLP filed by the insurance company wherein the Honble Supreme Court held that the insurer is under no obligation to perform its part of contract except in relation to its liability. ... Thus, it is clear that the aforesaid judgment of the Honble Supreme Court will never be applicable to a third party i. e. the claimants. Under the circumstances we fail to appreciate how the aforesaid judgment of the Honble Supreme#HL_....
2002 0 Supreme(Del) 835 • India - Delhi
A.K.SIKRI, H.R.MALHOTRA
( 2 ) THE writ petitioner herein has also questioned an order dated 26th/ 28/12/2001 issued by the Regional Director of the employees State Insurance Corporation whereby and whereunder its establishment was held to be covered under the provisions of the said Act as also a notice dated 30th January 2002
2002 0 Supreme(Jhk) 835 • India - Jharkhand
M.Y.EQBAL
In my opinion, therefore, the clarification given by the DGMS in the impugned letter is against the definition of the term mine as contained in Section 2 (j) of the said Act and it is also not in the teeth of the judgment of the Supreme Court reported in 1997 (1) SCC 177. ... (x) any premises for the time being used for depositing sand or other material for use in a mine or for depositing refuse from a 0 mine or in which any operations in connection with such sand, refuse or other material is being carried on, being premises exclusively occupied by the pow....
2002 0 Supreme(Ker) 835 • India - Kerala
BELLUR NARAYANASWAMY SRIKRISHNA, G.SIVARAJAN
Rejecting the argument, the Supreme Court held: ... "12. ... Rejecting the contention, the Supreme Court observed: ... "(9). ... As held by the Supreme Court in Sanjeev Coke Manufacturing Company v. M/s Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. ... The Supreme Court merely rejected the argument that the principle in S.8 (4) of the Act should be made applicable to non Legislators. In fact, (he Supreme Court did not rule out that Legislators could be a separate class by themselves. ... He has challenged his conviction by a....
Filter by Legal Phrase
