AI Overview...
-
Specific Performance & Sale Agreements - The case references the Limitation Act, 1963, particularly Article 54, and discusses agreements related to sale transactions. Notably reported in 163 2009 DLT 477, the judgment emphasizes the importance of adhering to statutory time limits for enforcing sale agreements and highlights relevant legal provisions. Sunil Arora VS V. K. Vadhera - Delhi
-
Witness Credibility & Evidence - Multiple SCC references (e.g., 2006 10 SCC 163, 2011 4 SCC 324, 2009 9 SCC 719, 2009 10 SCC 477) establish that witnesses related to the complainant or deceased cannot have their testimony disregarded solely due to their relationship. The courts recognize the value of such evidence, affirming that related witnesses are competent unless proven interested or biased. Raju @ Balachandran VS State of Tamil Nadu - Supreme Court, Chandran VS State Represented by, The Inspector of Police, Karivalam Vantha Nallur Police Station, Thirunelvelli District - Madras, Marimuthu VS State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Tirunelveli District - Madras, R. Pandi @ Pandian VS State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Sempatti Police Station, Dindigul - Madras
-
Constitutional Principles & Duties - The judgments (e.g., AIR 1993 SC 477, 1992 Supp. SCC 217, 2005 SCC 537) underscore the significance of constitutional values such as fraternity and fundamental duties, emphasizing respect for human dignity as a core norm. These principles guide judicial reasoning beyond mere legal formalities. Subramanian Swamy VS Union of India - Crimes, Chandran VS State Represented by, The Inspector of Police, Karivalam Vantha Nallur Police Station, Thirunelvelli District - Madras
-
Legal Proceedings & FIR Details - The case involving the police and FIR registration highlights procedural aspects, such as the body being first seen at 1:00 pm on 03.08.2009, and the subsequent complaint filed at 6:30 am the same day, demonstrating adherence to proper investigation protocols. R. Pandi @ Pandian VS State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Sempatti Police Station, Dindigul - Madras
-
Accident Claims & Insurance Cases - The judgment dated 12.10.2009 pertains to an accident claim case (petition no. 07/09), initially filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The case references precedents like 2009 2 SCC 417 and 2008 SCC 477, illustrating the legal framework for motor accident claims and insurance liability. National Insurance Co. Ltd. VS Jyoti - Delhi
Analysis and Conclusion:
The sources collectively highlight key legal principles such as the importance of timely enforcement of sale agreements, the credibility of related witnesses in criminal cases, and constitutional values guiding judicial decisions. They also detail procedural aspects of police investigations and accident claims, emphasizing adherence to statutory and procedural norms. The references to landmark SCC cases reinforce the judiciary's approach to evidence credibility, constitutional duties, and statutory compliance in various legal contexts.
Note: The query 2009 163 d L t 477 primarily points to the case reported in 163 2009 DLT 477, which discusses specific performance and sale agreements, with supporting references from related judgments and legal principles.
Search Results for "2009 163 d L t 477"
2014 0 Supreme(Del) 1470 • India - Delhi
G.S.SISTANI
specific performance - agreement to sell - Limitation Act, 1963 - Article 54 - 163 2009 DLT 477, 152 (2008) DLT 342, AIR 2009 ... Industries Ltd. reported at 163 2009 DLT 477 and more particularly paragraphs 9 to 13 and on Anisuddin & Anr. Vs. ... The DDA issued a letter to the defendant on 23.10.2009 calling upon the defendant to visit the office of the DDA and file documents pertaining to sale of plot. ... 20. ... Bibijan & Ors. reported at AIR #....
2012 8 Supreme 309 • India - Supreme Court
SWATANTER KUMAR, MADAN B.LOKUR
(2010) 6 SCC 673; (2011) 4 SCC 262; (2005) 9 SCC 616; (2006) 10 SCC 163 ... State of Andhra Pradesh, (2006) 10 SCC 163, State of Uttar Pradesh v. Naresh, (2011) 4 SCC 324, Jarnail Singh v. State of Punjab, (2009) 9 SCC 719 and Vishnu v. ... State of Rajasthan, (2009) 10 SCC 477 it was held: ... “It is clear that merely because the witnesses are related to the complainant or the deceased, their evidence cannot be thrown out.
• India - Crimes
DIPAK MISRA, PRAFULLA C.PANT
(Para 155, 158, 163) ... AIR 1993 SC 477 : ... 1992 Supp. (3) SCC 217; (2002) 1 SCC 428; Civil Appeal No. 8170 Of 2009 & Writ Petition (Civil) Nos. 320 ... Of 2009 & 192 Of 2010; 1994 Supp. (1) SCC 191; (2005) 6 SCC 537; a href='00100050898 ... Union Of India, Civil Appeal No. 8170 Of 2009 & Writ Petition (Civil) Nos. 320 Of 2009 & 192 Of 2010] exemptions granted to a private non-aided educational institution to only admit wards of army personnel was challenged. ... 163#HL....
2016 3 Supreme 598 • India - Supreme Court
(Para 155, 158, 163) ... AIR 1993 SC 477 : ... 1992 Supp. (3) SCC 217; (2002) 1 SCC 428; Civil Appeal No. 8170 Of 2009 & Writ Petition (Civil) Nos. 320 ... Of 2009 & 192 Of 2010; 1994 Supp. (1) SCC 191; (2005) 6 SCC 537; 163. We have referred to two concepts, namely, constitutional fraternity and the fundamental duty, as they constitute core constitutional values. Respect for the dignity of another is a constitutional norm. ... Union of India and others, AIR 1993 SC 477 : 1992 Supp. (....
2019 0 Supreme(Mad) 1898 • India - Madras
S.VAIDYANATHAN, N.ANAND VENKATESH
State of Andhra Pradesh, (2006) 10 SCC 163, State of Uttar Pradesh v. Naresh, (2011) 4 SCC 324, Jarnail Singh v. State of Punjab, (2009) 9 SCC 719 and Vishnu v. ... State of Rajasthan, (2009) 10 SCC 477 it was held: “It is clear that merely because the witnesses are related to the complainant or the deceased, their evidence cannot be thrown out. ... State of Tamil Nadu [Crl.A.No.1614 of 2009] reported in 2012 (12) SCC 701, while considering the distinction between a related witness and an interested wit....
2019 0 Supreme(Mad) 2237 • India - Madras
S.VAIDYANATHAN, N.ANAND VENKATESH
State of Andhra Pradesh, (2006) 10 SCC 163, State of Uttar Pradesh v. Naresh, (2011) 4 SCC 324, Jarnail Singh v. State of Punjab, (2009) 9 SCC 719 and Vishnu v. ... State of Rajasthan, (2009) 10 SCC 477 it was held: “It is clear that merely because the witnesses are related to the complainant or the deceased, their evidence cannot be thrown out.
2019 0 Supreme(Mad) 2284 • India - Madras
S.VAIDYANATHAN, N.ANAND VENKATESH
State of Andhra Pradesh, (2006) 10 SCC 163, State of Uttar Pradesh v. Naresh, (2011) 4 SCC 324, Jarnail Singh v. State of Punjab, (2009) 9 SCC 719 and Vishnu v. ... State of Rajasthan, (2009) 10 SCC 477 it was held: XXX XXX The body was first seen by the undersigned at 01:00pm on 03.08.2009. ... Thereafter, P.W.1 went to Sempatti Police Station and gave a complaint to the Sub Inspector of Police (P.W.9) on 03.08.2009 at about 6.30 a.m. Based on the complaint received from P.W.1, an FIR....
2009 0 Supreme(Del) 1032 • India - Delhi
REKHA SHARMA
2019 0 Supreme(Mad) 2096 • India - Madras
ANITA SUMANTH
Union of India and Others LNIND 2009 MAD 2622 : (2009) 7 MLJ 749 State of M.P. and Others v. Lalit Kumar Verma AIR 2007 SC 528 : (2007) 1 SCC 575 : LNIND 2006 SC 1034 Municipal Corpn., Jabalpur v. ... Somasundaram Viswanath and Others AIR 1988 SC 2255 : (1989) 1 SCC 175 : LNTND 1988 SC 477 J.M. Jacqueline Maley and Others v. ... State of Tamilnadu 2015-3-LW 163 : (2015) 3 MLJ 144 18. Mr. P.R. Gopinathan, appears for the UGC, Mr. Manisundar Gopal for the University of Madras and Mr. K.V. Sundararajan for PTB.
2017 0 Supreme(Del) 3193 • India - Delhi
R.K.GAUBA
The impugned judgment was passed on 12.10.2009 on accident claim case (petition no. 07/09 - original number 477/2008) which was instituted on 28.04.2008 by the first to third respondents on their behalf, and also on behalf of fourth and fifth respondents (all of them collectively referred to herein as ... Sadanand Mukhi and Others, (2009) 2 SCC 417, Ningamma and Another vs. United India Insurance Company Ltd. ... The claim case was initially presented as one under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 but midway the proceedings, on the ....
Filter by Legal Phrase
