AI Overview...
-
Judicial Precedents and Legal Principles - The Supreme Court and High Courts have emphasized careful interpretation of statutes and procedural correctness in criminal and civil cases. Notable cases include Krishnan v. Krishnaveni (1996), Gian Singh v. State of Punjab (2012), and Saidevan Thampi v. State of Kerala (2013), which underscore the importance of lawful proceedings and evidence evaluation Manjot Singh VS State of Punjab - Punjab and Haryana.
-
Property and Will Disputes - Courts have recognized the validity of property transfer through wills, as seen in the case where a defendant claimed ownership via a will dated 15.10.2008. Several rulings, including Jago Ram v. Municipal Committee (2018) and Baljit Singh v. Mattulal (1996), highlight the significance of documentary evidence in property disputes Kulwinder Singh Bhatti VS Naseeb Kaur - Punjab and Haryana.
-
Civil and Administrative Litigation - Cases like Director, Urban Local Bodies v. Sukhbir Singh (2015) and others demonstrate judicial scrutiny over administrative actions, with some petitions dismissed as premature, emphasizing procedural adherence in civil remedies Sheela Sehgal VS State Of Haryana - Punjab and Haryana.
-
Criminal Law and Evidence - Several judgments address procedural aspects of criminal cases, including the interpretation of mandatory versus directory provisions, as in the case of sentencing under Section 353, and the importance of conclusive trial outcomes before criminal prosecution impacts an individual, exemplified by the case involving a motor vehicle accident and licensing issues Surinder Kumar VS State of Punjab - Supreme Court, 00100068997.
-
Specific Case Appeals and Judgments - Appeals against convictions and judgments, such as those in Prabhat Singh @ Chhotu Singh (2009) and others, illustrate the appellate process where judgments are scrutinized and sometimes set aside, reaffirming the importance of proper trial procedures Rajesh VS State of Haryana - Punjab and Haryana.
-
Evidence and Procedure in Criminal Cases - The approach to evidence, especially the assessment of prosecution evidence and the role of witnesses, is highlighted in cases like Ramesh Singh (AIR 1977) and Sudhir Pingle (2000), emphasizing that the veracity of evidence should not be judged meticulously but fairly, ensuring just trial processes Manjit Kaur VS Arjinder Singh - Punjab and Haryana.
Analysis and Conclusion:
The sources collectively underscore the importance of procedural correctness, evidence evaluation, and adherence to legal principles in both civil and criminal cases. Judicial precedents reinforce the need for lawful proceedings, proper documentation, and fair trial standards. These principles are critical for ensuring justice, whether in property disputes, criminal trials, or administrative cases.
References:
- Krishnan v. Krishnaveni, 1997(1) RCR (Criminal) 724
- Gian Singh v. State of Punjab, 2012 (4) RCR (Criminal) 543
- Saidevan Thampi v. State of Kerala, 2013(4) Ker L.J., 611
- Jago Ram @ Jagdish v. Municipal Committee, Kalanaur, 2018 LawHerald 882
- Baljit Singh v. Mattulal, 1996 SCC 681
- Director, Urban Local Bodies v. Sukhbir Singh, 2015 (1) R.C.R. (Civil) 991
- Prabhat Singh @ Chhotu Singh, 2009 SCC 681
- Ramesh Singh, AIR 1977 SC 2018
- Sudhir Pingle, 2000(1) RCR (Criminal) 523
Search Results for "2018 1 Lawherald 681"
2018 0 Supreme(P&H) 129 • India - Punjab and Haryana
A.B.CHAUDHARI
... 1. ... In the case of Krishnan versus Krishnaveni & another, 1997(1) RCR (Criminal) 724 the Apex Court stated thus in para 14: ... “14. ... Krishnan versus Krishnaveni & another, 1997(1) RCR (Criminal) 724; Gian Singh versus State of Punjab & another, 2012 (4) RCR (Criminal) 543 and one judgment of Hon’ble Kerala High Court i.e. Saidevan Thampi versus State of Kerala, 2013(4) Ker L.J., 611. ... The present petition has been filed essentially to challenge the order (Annexure P-1) made by the trial Court holding that i....
2020 0 Supreme(P&H) 704 • India - Punjab and Haryana
RAJ MOHAN SINGH
He has further argued that defendant No.1 has become owner of the suit property by way of Will dated 15.10.2008 executed by his father. He further relied upon Jago Ram @ Jagdish Vs. Municipal Committee, Kalanaur and another,2018 1 LawHerald 882 and Baljit Singh Vs. ... Mattulal (dead) through LRs, (1996) 11 SCC 681 , Shaik Khadaru Masthan Vs. Smt. Sayyed Fathimun Bee, (2008) 1 ICC 107 and Mrs. Sonya Chikhalikar and another Vs. Mrs. Anita Fernandes and another,2014 SCCOnLineBom 1782 in ....
2020 0 Supreme(P&H) 796 • India - Punjab and Haryana
DAYA CHAUDHARY, MEENAKSHI I.MEHTA
Director, Urban Local Bodies, Chandigarh and others, 2015 (1) R.C.R. (Civil) 991 , Sukhbir Singh vs. State of Haryana 1996(3) R.C.R. (Civil) 103 , Budho Devi vs. Deputy Commissioner, Gurgaon 1998 (4) R.C.R. (Civil) 80 and Ranbir Singh vs. State of Haryana and others 2011(1) R.C.R. (Civil) 681 . ... Petitioner filed CWP No.16656 of 2018, however, that petition was dismissed vide order dated 11.07.2018 by this Court being premature. ... Initially the meeting was called on 12.07.2018 but ....
2020 1 Supreme 30 • India - Supreme Court
N.V.RAMANA, R.SUBHASH REDDY, B.R.GAVAI
State of Maharashtra, (2006) 10 SCC 681. (ii) Noor Aga v. State of Punjab & Anr, (2008)16 SCC 417, . (iii) Mohan Lal v. State of Punjab, (2018)17 SCC 627. ... State of Punjab, (2018)17 SCC 627, shall continue to be governed by the individual facts of the case. 10. ... The case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 12.09.1996, Devi Lal, HC (PW-1), Darbara Singh, S.I. ... It is specifically pleaded that the ASP, Abhor who was called at the spot and in his presence his bag was searched which resulted into recovery of #HL....
2023 6 Supreme 258 • India - Supreme Court
A. S. BOPANNA, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA
is assailing the judgment dated 12.02.2019 passed by High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amravati in Criminal Petition No. 12675 of 2018 ... No.681 of 2017 and analogous complaints on file of II Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Visakhapatnam. ... Appellant is complainant in CC No. 681 of 2017 and other complaints, filed against accused-respondent no.2 under Sections 138 and ... The complaints bearing CC No.681 of 2018, CC No.644 of 2018, CC No.250 of 2018, and ....
2023 0 Supreme(P&H) 1415 • India - Punjab and Haryana
HARKESH MANUJA
(Paras 1, 12) ... ... Facts of the case: ... The appellant was convicted under FIRs for theft ... He appealed against his conviction and sentencing recorded on 08.12.2018, arguing for concurrent sentences due to young age and perceived ... Although sub-section (1) at the first blush appears to be of mandatory nature, but the fact that a discretionary power has been given to the Court to direct that subsequent sentences can run concurrently, sub-section (1) is merely directory and not mandatory. ... CRA-S-333-2019 & ....
2019 0 Supreme(P&H) 1143 • India - Punjab and Haryana
RAJIV SHARMA, HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
Prabhat Singh @ Chhotu Singh and Another, (2009) 6 SCC 681. ... 1. ... This appeal is instituted against the judgment dated 26.03.2018 and order dated 27.03.2018 rendered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Faridabad, in Sessions Case RBT no. 116 dated 05.09.2016/27.10.2017 whereby the appellant was charged with and tried for offences punishable under Sections 363 ... The appeal is allowed and the judgment dated 26.03.2018 and order dated 27.03.2018 are set aside. The appellant ....
2019 0 Supreme(P&H) 75 • India - Punjab and Haryana
JAISHREE THAKUR
Versus Kailash Devi and others, (2018) 189 PunLR 681. ... 15. ... No.1 was not holding a valid driving licence. ... It is further submitted that mere registration of a criminal case against appellant No.1 would not be relevant unless the trial is concluded and the appellant No.1 is held guilty in that case. ... 8. ... ... 1. Whether Baldev Singh died in motor vehicle accident which took place on 8.10.2k at about 7.00 p.m. In the area of village Barhing (Jharing) due to rash and neglig....
2019 2 Supreme 273 • India - Supreme Court
KURIAN JOSEPH, SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
(Para 7, 8, 9) ... Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 681 of 2017 ( ... Raj); 2018 SCC OnLine Mad 2332 – Overruled ... Interpretation of statute ... State of Rajasthan decided on 06.02.2017 in Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 681 of 2017 and the other of the High Court of Madras in M. Siluvai Murugan @ Murugan v. State decided on 30.07.2018 in Criminal Appeal No. 861 of 2016 (2018 SCC OnLine Mad 2332). ... ... 1. Leave granted. ... 2. ... ... Explanation 1.- F....
2010 0 Supreme(P&H) 954 • India - Punjab and Haryana
RAM CHAND GUPTA
State of Punjab 1989 (1) RCR (Criminal) 18, and Trimukh Maroti Kirkan V. State of Maharasthra, 2006 (10) SCC 681. ... 12. ... Ramesh Singh, AIR 1977 SC 2018, the truth, veracity and effect of the evidence which the prosecutor proposes to adduce are not to be meticulously judged. ... Sudhir Pingle, 2000(1) RCR (Criminal) 523, it was observed as under: ... “4. In our view, it is apparent that the entire approach of the High Court is illegal and erroneous. ... Briefly stated, on the complaint of the petitioner-complainant....
Filter by Legal Phrase
