Administrative Exigencies - Cannot be a sufficient ground to condone delays in filing or refiling appeals or applications. Courts have consistently held that delays caused solely by administrative exigencies are not valid reasons to extend limitation periods. For instance, in State of Haryana VS Surja - Punjab and Haryana, the court emphasized that such exigencies cannot justify delays of 75 and 95 days. Similarly, State Of Haryana VS Kanshi Ram - Punjab and Haryana and D. M. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. VS SALMA KHATOON - Orissa reiterated that administrative reasons alone do not warrant condonation and that delay must be explained with sufficient cause, not merely administrative inconvenience.
False or Insufficient Grounds - Courts reject claims that rely solely on administrative exigencies without proper explanation. In Kastoori (Deceased) through L. R. VS Ghanshyam - Rajasthan, the court emphasized that delay cannot be condoned mechanically on administrative grounds without satisfactory reasons. The courts are cautious to avoid setting a precedent where administrative delays are automatically accepted, which could undermine the purpose of limitation statutes.
Judicial Discretion - The discretion to condone delay is not to be exercised based on sympathy or benevolence but on objective assessment of sufficient cause. As noted in D. M. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. VS SALMA KHATOON - Orissa, condoning delay purely on administrative exigencies risks trivializing the limitation period, which courts aim to prevent.
Justice and Fairness - Where delays are condoned, courts often do so to prevent injustice, especially when delays are caused by administrative processes that are beyond the control of the parties. For example, in State of Rajasthan VS Shri Umrao Singh - Rajasthan and State of Rajasthan VS Umrao Singh - Madhya Pradesh, delays caused by administrative exigencies were condoned to avoid injustice, particularly in cases involving appointments on compassionate grounds or administrative procedures.
Limitations and Risks - Mechanical condonation of delays solely on administrative exigencies can lead to unjust outcomes and undermine the integrity of limitation laws. Courts emphasize the need for genuine, satisfactory explanations for delays and caution against condoning delays without proper justification.
Analysis and Conclusion:
Administrative exigencies alone are generally insufficient grounds to condone delays under limitation statutes. Courts require clear, satisfactory reasons demonstrating that the delay was beyond the control of the party and not merely due to administrative inconvenience. While justice may sometimes warrant condonation to prevent injustice, such decisions are exercised cautiously and based on objective criteria, not on administrative reasons alone. This approach preserves the integrity of limitation laws and ensures fair treatment of all parties.
averments--Administrative exigencies cannot be held to be a sufficient ground to condone such a delay. ... exigencies” cannot be held to be a sufficient ground to condone such a delay--Limitation Act, 1963, S.5. ... --False plea--Administrative exigencies--Sufficient cause--Delay of 75 days in filing as well as 95 days in refilling of the appeals ... It may also be noticed at thi....
exigencies--The appellant has failed to explain the delay caused at various levels--This itself is not a ground to condone the delay ... -Delay of 84 days in filing the appeal--Delay sought to be condoned on the ground that delay has been caused due to administrative ... (A) Civil Procedure Code, 1908, S.100--Limitation Act, 1963, S.5--Condonation of delay--Administrati....
Judicial discretion to condone the delay is not to be swayed by sympathy or benevolence. ... by time due to the 644-day delay. ... , citing a lack of sufficient cause for the delay. ... If the delay is to be condoned mechanically on the ground of administrative exigencies, then in almost all cases the Court has to condone the delay. That is never the intention of the Supreme Court while laying dow....
Appointment on compassionate ground – Condo nation of delay - On merits, the appellant has a good case. ... was consummated - No further consideration on compassionate ground would ever arise. ... when on such compassionate ground candidate had been appointed as a clerk - Ratio of the judgment will clearly apply to this case ... We find that the delay had been caused on account of administrative exigencies. The failure to condone the delay#....
exigencies — Failure to condone delay has caused injustice to appellant — Delay condoned and matter decided on the merits. ... (Para 8 & 9)(b) Civil Practice —Limitation despute — Delay in filing appeal before Division Bench — Delay caused on account of administrative ... appointment on the post of Sub-Inspector on the same ground — Once the right to be appointed on compassionate ground is consumed ... We find that....
... (2) Limitation -- delay occasioned due to administrative exigencies ... (1) Civil Services -- appointment on compassionate ground consummated on particular post -- further consideration would never arise ... -should be condoned in interest of justice. ... We find that the delay had been caused on account of administrative exigencies. The failure to condone the delay has resulted in injustice as rightly ur....
The delay was 16 days and the ground sought was administrative exigencies. ... Issues: Whether the delay in filing the appeals should be condoned on the ground of administrative exigencies. ... of administrative exigencies. ... ... ( 8 ) IF the delay is to be condoned mechanically on the ground of administrative ex....
9- blh izdkj ls ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; us vkj-,y-vkj- 1995¼2½ ist 585 ij Nis fofu.kZ; U;w bf.M;k ba;ksusUl dEiuh cuke Jh dslj ds fofu.kZ; esa ,-vkbZ-vkj- 1997 lqizhe dksVZ ist 1353 dks m)fjr djrs gq, fueu er O;ä fd;k gS& ... "If the delay
is required to pass its decision on the point of limitation and thereafter, if delay is condoned, then it should proceed to decide ... in filing appeal/revision is required, assign reliable to sufficient and satisfactory reasons of delay — First of all the Court ... Limitation Act, 1963, Sec. 5 — Treating the appeal of mutation within limitation even after 25 years — Held — The party that has caused delay ... is to be condoned mechanically on the ground of administrative#HL_E....
The delay of 253 days was attributed to administrative exigencies and procedural delays within the insurance company. ... Finding of the Court: The court found that the delay was due to administrative exigencies and procedural processes ... It considered the impact of administrative delays and the need to balance the interests of the parties involved. ... Keshar and Others, (1996) ACJ 1057 : AIR 1996 Raj 28, it has been observed as follows: ... If the dela....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.