AI Overview

AI Overview...

Analysis and Conclusion:
The core issue revolves around the classification and permissible use of land and electricity connection restrictions. Land not suitable for cultivation or outside the statutory definition of agricultural land cannot be classified as agricultural for the purpose of electricity tariffs or land use. Electricity connections for agriculture are granted based on purpose, and industrial or commercial connections are subject to dues clearance and specific rules. Importantly, residential constructions within Lal Dora areas are not considered commercial, allowing for residential exemptions. Overall, land and electricity use are tightly regulated based on purpose and land classification, with clear legal provisions governing each aspect.

Search Results for "Agriculture Category Electricty Connection Cannot be Given in Residential Land"

Shalimar Estates Pvt.  Ltd.  VS Union Territory of Chandigarh

2013 0 Supreme(P&H) 1104 India - Punjab and Haryana

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH

Fact of the Case: The petitioner constructed a building for residential flats within Lal Dora, which was alleged to ... The court examines the exemption provided under Section 15 for buildings for residential purposes and the interpretation of 'commercial ... The court emphasized that the construction of residential apartments within Lal Dora and their sale did not amount to commercial ... Certainly, the construction of a multi-storeyed residential apartment building, as per plan, would not fall in this categ....

Anupriya Agro Industry VS West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Limited

2022 0 Supreme(Cal) 1313 India - Calcutta

SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA

Sole proprietorship firm - Sought for an electricity connection for industrial purpose - Non-payment of ... energy bills - Held, no such link could be established in present case, since petitioner has a separate electricity connection for ... and outstanding dues left by his father at Plot No. claim of prior payment for Consumer ID No. 300239058 in respect of Plot No. cannot ... The connection at Plot No. 3223 was admittedly taken for operating a submersible pump and not resi....

GRAM PANCHAYAT KHUNYARA VS STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

1978 0 Supreme(HP) 21 India - Himachal Pradesh

C.R.THAKUR, T.U.MEHTA

subservient to agriculture or for pasture. 8. ... subservient to agriculture or for pasture. 8. ... or for purposes subservient to agriculture or for pasture". 4. ... Therefore, if a particular category of land does not fall within the statutory definition of the word land then it cannot be said that land vests in the State under section 3. ... In other words, the land which is not at all capable of cultivation under any condition, ....

Nava Bharat Ferro Alloys Ltd.  VS A. P. S. E. Board, Hyderabad

1985 0 Supreme(AP) 151 India - Andhra Pradesh

P.CHENNAKESAVA REDDY, P.RAMACHANDRA RAJU

T. consumers, such as agriculture, irrigation, and public lighting, was reasonable and justified. 3. ... - The Council's role was limited to providing advice on major policy decisions, and tariff revisions did not fall within this category ... The Court examined the legality of the Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Board's (Board) tariff revisions for high tension (H. ... Category-V (b) (Agriculture) : This category provided for the use of agriculture and irrigation ....

Nava Bharat Ferro Alloys Limited VS A. P. State Electricity Board, Hyderabad

1985 0 Supreme(AP) 154 India - Andhra Pradesh

P.CHENNAKESAVA REDDY, P.RAMACHANDRA RAJU

These consumers are generally weaker sections of society and cannot be expected to bear the burden of higher electricity tariffs. ... The High Court of Andhra Pradesh held that the Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Board (Board) had the authority to revise electricity ... Fact of the Case: The Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Board (Board) revised electricity tariffs in 1981 and 1984. ... Category-V (b) (Agriculture): This category....

Delhi Sainik Cooperative Housing Building Society Ltd. (Regd. ) VS Union of India

2021 0 Supreme(Del) 13 India - Delhi

JAYANT NATH

Fact of the Case: The petitioners, including veterans and armed forces personnel, sought civic facilities for their residential ... The petitioners in the present petition belong to an entirely different class and category of persons and prima facie cannot be termed as affluent persons. ... The court noted that the present petitioners belong to an entirely different class and category of persons and prima facie cannot be termed as affluent persons. ... However, the Minutes of the Meeting dated 10.05.19....

PepsiCo India Holding Pvt.  Ltd.  VS State of Maharashtra

2011 8 Supreme 18 India - Supreme Court

MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, ANIL R.DAVE

by respondent4-Writ Petition filed by appellant questioning the levy of increased water charges on ground that it could not be given ... Writ Petition was filed by appellant questioning the levy of increased water charges on ground that it could not be given retrospective ... Requirement and use of water in these industries is huge and therefore they are placed as one distinct category or class of their own. These industries stand apart from other industries and also differently situated from residential houses. ... .......

K. C.  Ninan VS Kerala State Electricity Board

2023 0 Supreme(SC) 555 India - Supreme Court

D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, HIMA KOHLI, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA

Electricity Act, 2003 – Sections 43, 49 and 50 – Restoration of power connection – Duty to supply electricity ... Electric Utilities refused to provide an electricity connection unless the auction purchaser paid the dues of the previous owner. ... provided – Even if consumer is same, but premises are different, it will be considered as a fresh connection and not a reconnection ... The rule of ejusdem generis cannot be applied when there is no distinct catego....

M.  Madhan Mohan VS State of Tamil Nadu, rep.  by Principal Secretary to Government, Energy Department, Secretariat

2012 0 Supreme(Mad) 4825 India - Madras

V.DHANAPALAN

Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Sections 5A, 17(1) and (2) Governance acquired land under sec 17(2) of LARR, and process of enquiry mandated ... He claims to have purchased the same out of his hard agriculture labour under various Sale Deeds for a valuable consideration and mutation of his name in the Revenue Records has also been made. Consequently, Patta has also been given in his favour. ... The acquisition of land for residential, commercial, industrial or institutional purposes can be treated as an acqu....

COLLECTOR, MIRZAPUR VS NAND KISHOR AGARWAL

2012 0 Supreme(All) 2325 India - Allahabad

PRAKASH KRISHNA, ARVIND KUMAR TRIPATHI

to be assessed on Circle rate of residential area or like an agricultural land per bigha? ... 7 biswas and 1 dhur land including trees, wells and Pakka house acquired—Reference Court has decided market value of land to be ... Land Acquisition Act, 1894—Sections 4(1) and 23—Land acquisition—Compensation—Market value—Mode of determination of—Total 18 bigha ... The award was given on 24.1.1986 and the market value of the land was fixed as @ Rs. 12,698.41 per bigha for th....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top