AI Overview...
-
Ahmed Unnissa Begum and the Rent Act - The Act restricts ownership and enjoyment of house property, and its validity hinges on passing the test of reasonableness. Courts have upheld that the Act only protects tenants against unreasonable eviction, emphasizing that eviction must be reasonable to be valid Alagarsamy VS S. N. Ramanoorthy - Madras, S. Manimudi VS State of Tamil Nadu and others - Madras.
-
Interpretation of Landlord and Related Cases - The term landlord was expanded based on societal norms in India, as seen in Saraswathi v. Vadivelu Chettiar, and later legislatively accepted. The courts have interpreted the scope of landlord rights and responsibilities within this framework K. I. Kangu VS Ahmed Unnissa Begum - Madras.
-
Case Law on Eviction and Reasonableness - Several cases, including Ahmed Unnissa Begum (1963-1 Mad LJ 97), highlight the importance of reasonableness in eviction proceedings. For example, eviction for the landlord’s need (e.g., to accommodate a family member or for personal use) must be justified as reasonable, considering the circumstances T. Sivasankaran VS H. K. N. Karcharlal Sowcar - Madras.
-
Protection Against Unreasonable Eviction - The courts have consistently maintained that the rent control legislation aims to prevent arbitrary eviction, and only eviction deemed unreasonable is invalid. This principle was reinforced in Ahmed Pasha v. Wajid Unnissa Wajeeda Begum In Re: Yerasuri Lakshminarayana Murthy VS . - Andhra Pradesh.
-
Additional Insights - Various cases mention the scope of permissible occupants, including family members like nieces, nephews, or children, and the necessity to assess whether eviction is reasonable in each context. The law balances tenant protection with landlords’ rights, emphasizing reasonableness as a key criterion B. Balaiah VS Chandoor Lachaiah - Andhra Pradesh, B. BALAIAH VS CHANDOOR LACHAIAH - Andhra Pradesh.
Summary:
Ahmed Unnissa Begum’s case and related judgments emphasize that rent control laws in India protect tenants from unreasonable eviction, with the landlord definition evolving through case law to reflect societal norms. Courts scrutinize eviction cases for reasonableness, ensuring that restrictions on property rights serve social justice without arbitrary interference.
Search Results for "Ahmed Unnissa be"
1962 0 Supreme(Mad) 228 • India - Madras
VEERASWAMI
1976 0 Supreme(Mad) 229 • India - Madras
T.RAMAPRASADA RAO
Ahmed Unnissa Begum1. The learned Judge was dealing with a case of eviction under section 7 (3) (c) of the 1949 Act. ... Ahmed Unnissa Begum2and Saraswathi v. Vadivelu Chettiar3the Court, on the basis of the norms and standards of an Indian society, expanded the meaning of the word " landlord " which was afterwards accepted by the Legislature as well. ... Ahmed Unnissa Begum4. After the decision in Saraswathi v. Vadivelu Chettiar3, the section was amended in 1973 by Act XXIII of 1973. ....
1997 0 Supreme(Mad) 506 • India - Madras
S.S.SUBRAMANI
Ahmed Unnissa Begum, the Act being a restriction upon the ownership and enjoyment of house property has to pass the test of reasonableness and in fact it was on that ground, among others, the validity of the Act was upheld, and consequently what the Act protects is only against an unreasonable eviction
1983 0 Supreme(Mad) 456 • India - Madras
PADMANABHAN, K.B.N.SINGH
Ahmed Unnissa Begum (1963-1 Mad LJ 97). The landlord wanted the portion in the occupation of the tenant for additional accommodation on the ground that she required the same inorder to enable her son-in-law to a open clinic. Admittedly, the daughter and son-in-law were living with the landlord. ... Ahmed Unnissa Begum (1963-1 Mad LJ 97) the Act being a restriction upon the ownership and enjoyment of house property has to pass the test of reasonableness and in fact it was on that ground, among others, the validity of the ....
1965 0 Supreme(AP) 10 • India - Andhra Pradesh
BASI REDDY, GOPAL RAO EKBOTE
Ahmed Unnissa Begum, (1963) 1 Mad LJ 97 : ... (g) a sister's son - Bidhubhusan v. Commr. Patna Division. AIR 1955 Pat 496; ... (h) children and the landlord's friend and his wife to look after the children - Smith v.
1965 0 Supreme(AP) 12 • India - Andhra Pradesh
A.GOPAL RAO, BASI REDDY
Ahmed Unnissa Begum, (1963) I mad LJ 97 ; (g) a sisters son - Bidhubhusan v. Commr. , Patna Division, AIR 1955 Pat 496 ; (h) children and the landlords friend and his wife to look after the children - Smith v.
1985 0 Supreme(AP) 341 • India - Andhra Pradesh
K.A.SWAMI
This is also the view taken by a learned single Judge in Ahmed Pasha v. Wajid Unnissa Wajeeda Begum (1983) 1 APLJ (HC) 42 : (1983 Cri LJ 479 ). The revision is, therefore dismissed. ... ( 2 ) IT is represented that Crl. R.
1992 0 Supreme(Mad) 631 • India - Madras
SRINIVASAN
Ahmed Unnissa Begum, (1963)1 M.L.J. 97, Veerasami,J. emphasised that the Act protected the tenant only against unreasonable eviction. ... 12. In R. Venkataswami Naidu and another v.
1965 0 Supreme(AP) 11 • India - Andhra Pradesh
GOPALRAO EKBOLE, BASI REDDY
Ahmed Unnissa Begum , (g) a sister s son Bidhubhusan v. Commissioner, Patna (h) children and the landlord s friend and his wife to look after the children smtih v, Penny , and (i) a niece of the tenant s wife who had nursed the ceaaat and las wife jones v.
2018 0 Supreme(All) 2258 • India - Allahabad
SHASHI KANT
In Syed Ahmed vs. Qadir Unnissa Begum, AIR 1954 A.P. 225, the Court said that : ... "2. ... Syed Ahmed vs. Qadir Unnissa Begum, AIR (1954) A.P. 225 (Para 6) ... 4. M. Dorrayya and another vs. Sri Baleshwarswami Varu and Sri Venugopalswamy Varu a Deity Reptd. by its Trustee A. Adinarayana Murty and Anr., AIR (1966) A.P. 259. (Para 3). ... 5.
Filter by Legal Phrase
