AI Overview...

Alak Ranjan Paul - The name appears in multiple legal contexts, notably in cases concerning execution procedures and amendments to execution applications J. RAMA VS VIJAYA BANK, HEAD OFFICE, MANGALORE - Karnataka, Yasin Ali VS ISt Additional District Judge, Shahjahanpur - Allahabad, Union of India, rep. by General Manager, South Central Railway, Secunderabad VS Gopalakrishnamurthy - Andhra Pradesh, RAJENDRA PRASAD AGARWALLA VS ALLAHABAD BANK - Calcutta, ADARSH CHOPRA VS CHAMPA DEVI - Allahabad.
Legal Proceedings and Judgments:
In Sabitri Bala Mallick v Alak Ranjan Paul and other cases, the courts examined issues related to execution of decrees and amendments to execution petitions J. RAMA VS VIJAYA BANK, HEAD OFFICE, MANGALORE - Karnataka.
The Calcutta High Court in AIR 1980 Cal 249 held that once process for execution is issued, Rule 17 of Order 21 cannot be invoked to amend the execution application, and powers under Sections 151 and 153 CPC are also unavailable for such amendments Yasin Ali VS ISt Additional District Judge, Shahjahanpur - Allahabad, RAJENDRA PRASAD AGARWALLA VS ALLAHABAD BANK - Calcutta.
The Allahabad High Court in Kishore Joo v Guman Behari Joo Deo also dealt with similar issues, emphasizing the finality of execution proceedings and restrictions on amendments J. RAMA VS VIJAYA BANK, HEAD OFFICE, MANGALORE - Karnataka.
Main Points and Insights:
Amendments to execution applications after process issuance are generally not permissible, as clarified in AIR 1980 Cal 249, which emphasizes the procedural finality and restricts courts from allowing amendments that affect substantial rights of judgment-debtors Yasin Ali VS ISt Additional District Judge, Shahjahanpur - Allahabad.
The courts have held that allowing such amendments could prejudice the judgment-debtor's rights and disrupt the execution process Union of India, rep. by General Manager, South Central Railway, Secunderabad VS Gopalakrishnamurthy - Andhra Pradesh.
The cases cited reinforce the principle that procedural amendments in execution proceedings are limited and must adhere to strict rules to maintain procedural integrity RAJENDRA PRASAD AGARWALLA VS ALLAHABAD BANK - Calcutta.
Analysis and Conclusion:
Alak Ranjan Paul is primarily associated with legal disputes concerning the execution of decrees and the procedural limitations on amending execution petitions.
Courts have consistently upheld the view that amendments post-issuance of process are generally barred unless explicitly permitted by law, to prevent abuse and ensure finality in execution proceedings Yasin Ali VS ISt Additional District Judge, Shahjahanpur - Allahabad, RAJENDRA PRASAD AGARWALLA VS ALLAHABAD BANK - Calcutta.
These rulings underscore the importance of procedural discipline in execution cases and the courts' reluctance to allow amendments that could alter the rights of parties at a late stage J. RAMA VS VIJAYA BANK, HEAD OFFICE, MANGALORE - Karnataka.

References: - Sabitri Bala Mallick v Alak Ranjan Paul, Allahabad High Court - AIR 1980 Cal 249 (Alak Ranjan Paul case) - Kishore Joo v Guman Behari Joo Deo, Allahabad High Court

Search Results for "Alak Ranjan Paul"

SABITRI BALA MULLICK VS ALAK RANJAN PAUL

1980 0 Supreme(Cal) 196 • India - Calcutta

M.K.MUKHERJEE

J. RAMA VS VIJAYA BANK, HEAD OFFICE, MANGALORE

1996 0 Supreme(Kar) 299 • India - Karnataka

M.F.SALDANHA

Sabitri Bala Mallick and others v Alak Ranjan Paul and others, as also another decision of the Allahabad High Court Kishore Joo v Guman Behari Joo Deo.

Yasin Ali VS ISt Additional District Judge, Shahjahanpur

1991 0 Supreme(All) 832 • India - Allahabad

R.B.MEHROTRA

Alak Ranjan Paul, AIR 1980 Cal. 249, wherein it has been held that after process for execution is issued, order 21 rule 17 cannot be invoked for amendment of the execution application and powers under sections 151 and 153 can also not be invoked for amending the execution application

1989 0 Supreme(Ori) 346 • India - Orissa

L.RATH

Alak Ranjan Paul and Others, ... 4.

Union of India, rep. by General Manager, South Central Railway, Secunderabad VS Gopalakrishnamurthy

2002 0 Supreme(AP) 749 • India - Andhra Pradesh

V.ESWARAIAH

Alak ranjan Paul and submitted that the executing court is not justified in allowing the application filed by the decreeholder for amending the petition for execution by incorporating the prayer which affects the substantial interest of the judgment-debtor.

RAJENDRA PRASAD AGARWALLA VS ALLAHABAD BANK

1986 0 Supreme(Cal) 169 • India - Calcutta

BIMAL CHANDRA BASAK, S.K.HAZARI

Alak Ranjan Paul, reported in AIR 1980 Cal 249. ... ( 7 ) BEFORE we deal with the submissions made before us we shall deal with the cases cited before us. ... Aloke Ranjan Paul (AIR 1980 Cal 249) (supra ). After discussing the judgements in the cases of Rohini Kumar Roy v. Krishna Prasad, reported in (1935) 39 Cal WN 1144, Kalipada Sinha v.

2004 0 Supreme(All) 2627 • India - Allahabad

VIKRAM NATH

Alak Ranjan Paul and Others, AIR 1980 Cal 249 ... (5) Bhaskaran v. Shreedharan 2002 (5) AWC 4180 (SC) : 2002 (47) ALR 383. ... 13.

Smt. Suparna Paul vs The State of Tripura and 4 Ors

• India - High Court of Tripura

Debabrata Acharjee, son of Bibhu Ranjan ... Suparna Paul, daughter of Subhash Chandra Paul, resident of Binoy Bhushan Paul, son of Ganesh Paul, resident of Matabari, ... Suman Paul, son of Rakhal Paul, resident of Badharghat, P.O.

SABA REYAZ AND ORS vs THE KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 4843 • India - Calcutta High Court

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 5144 • India - Calcutta High Court

Filter by Legal Phrase

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

Approbate and Reprobate: Key Legal Doctrine Explained Vague Threatening Phone Calls: Why They Fail in Court Does SCC Own Copyright on Full Text Judgments? G.O. Ms No. 108: TN Salesman & Packer Recruitment Rules Article 226 vs 227: Key Differences in High Court Powers Judgments on One-Time GNA Charges in India TIP: Judicial vs Executive Magistrate Rules Explained Can a Sole Dissenting Member Block Society Redevelopment? How to Sue Fake Facebook Accounts for Defamation in India Illustrations: Person Dominating Will in Indian Law Perusal in Court Orders: What It Means in Law Litigant Vigilance: Essential Duty in Court Proceedings What to Do If Company Suit Signatory Dies Renting House Without Rent Agreement in India: Risks Stay on Money Realization After Ejectment: Is It Possible?