AI Overview

AI Overview...

Analysis and Conclusion:
In cases involving offenses under Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Chhattisgarh High Court has demonstrated a cautious approach, granting bail in appropriate circumstances while upholding the seriousness of certain allegations. The courts also recognize procedural safeguards such as victim notification and juvenile rights. Decisions are subject to judicial review, and bail is often granted with sureties and bonds, reflecting a balanced approach between individual liberty and judicial discretion Pravin Gupta vs State Of Chhattisgarh - Chhattisgarh, KULDEEP SINGH@MONTU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH - Chhattisgarh, TAIYYAB KHAN vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH - Chhattisgarh.

Search Results for "Bail for 69 Bns Chattisgarh High Court"

Pravin Gupta vs State Of Chhattisgarh

2025 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 9994 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal, J

... ... Findings of Court: ... The trial court's rejection of anticipatory bail was upheld due to the evident gravity and nature ... ... ... Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled against granting bail, affirming that the allegations established a significant concern ... - Court reviews trial court’s rejection based on the seriousness of the allegations and applicable legal provisions. ... He placed reliance on the decision of Hon’ble Madhya Pradesh High Court in the ma....

Goverdhan VS State Of Chhattisgarh

2025 1 Supreme 65 India - Supreme Court

N. KOTISWAR SINGH, B. R. GAVAI, K. V. VISWANATHAN

Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur in Criminal Appeal No. 290/2002 whereby High Court upheld conviction and sentence imposed upon ... Findings of Court: In the event of appellants paying the amount as ordered, bail bonds ... and High Court – Appellants convicted under Part I of Section 304 IPC and sentenced to period already undergone by them and fine ... 69. ... The present appeal has been preferred against judgment and order date....

Sandeep Singh Alias Sonu vs State Of Rajasthan

2025 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 11625 India - High Court of Rajasthan (Jodhpur Bench)

SANDEEP SHAH, J

... ... Findings of Court: ... The court determined that the victim must be informed of bail applications, though not required as ... application - The court addressed the necessity of notifying the victim or their guardian regarding bail proceedings, highlighting ... The case involved a charge under the POCSO Act, with the court analyzing the involvement of the victim in bail proceedings. ... Similarly, the Division Bench of High Court#H....

Dasarath Ray @ Dipjyoti Roy VS State of Assam Rep.  By The P. P. , Assam.

2024 0 Supreme(Gau) 906 India - Gauhati

VIJAY BISHNOI, KARDAK ETE

... ... Findings of Court: ... The court held that a juvenile can file for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. and that the ... for juveniles - The court addressed whether a juvenile can apply for anticipatory bail before actual apprehension for a non-bailable ... The court concluded that denying anticipatory bail to juveniles would leave them remedy-less until apprehended, thus ruling that ... Resultantly, keeping in view the above, we are of the considered....

VIRAL NARENDRA GOSALIA vs THE SENIOR INTELLIGENCE OFFICER DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF GOODS AND SERVICES TAX INTELLIGENCE

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 30327 India - Karnataka High Court

HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J

... ... Findings of Court: ... The petition is maintainable, and the court allowed bail, emphasizing the importance of legal procedures ... ... ... Result: Petition partly allowed; bail granted. ... (A) Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227 - Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - Section 69(1) - BNSS, 2023 - Section ... Union of India, High Court of Chhattisgarh, MCRC No. 2729, 2023. 6. Per contra, Sri Madhu N. ... Union of India, 201....

Pinki VS State of Uttar Pradesh

2025 3 Supreme 385 India - Supreme Court

J. B. PARDIWALA, R. MAHADEVAN

granted by High Court to accused persons. ... wherever they are in country – Impugned orders of bail passed by High Court set aside – Two months’ time granted to State Police ... Out of 14 accused persons, bail of 5 accused persons have already been cancelled by Supreme Court. ... Why did the State not deem fit to challenge the orders of bail passed by the High Court? The State unfortunately has exhibited no seriou....

KULDEEP SINGH@MONTU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

2025 Supreme(Online)(CHH) 3520 India - High Court of Chhattisgarh

2025:CGHC:18842 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 3191 of 2025 Kuldeep Singh @ Montu S/o Shri Gopal Singh Aged About 35 Years R/o Shyam Nagar, Indira Chowk, House No. 32/1165, Police Station- Telibandha ... 69/2025 registered at Police Station Mana Camp, District Raipur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 309(4), 117(2) and 324(2) of the BNS, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties in the like sum to the satisfaction ... ....

IMANUEL TIRKEY vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

2025 Supreme(Online)(CHH) 3637 India - High Court of Chhattisgarh

punishable under Section 64(2)(n), 69 and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS). ... 2025:CGHC:18353 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 3113 of 2025 Imanuel Tirkey S/o Mukesh Tirkey Aged About 23 Years R/o - Dabra, Police Chouki - Dabra, P.S. - Pasta, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh ... ... Let applicant - Imanuel Tirkey involved in Crime No. 02/2025, registered at Police Station – Pasta, District – Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G....

TAIYYAB KHAN vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

2024 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 18262 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

offence punishable under Section 69, 351(2) of BNS{(376)(2)(n), 506 of IPC}. ... 2024:CGHC:36425 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 6434 of 2024 • Taiyyab Khan S/o Kadir Khan Aged About 27 Years R/o Village Gatoura, P.S. Masturi, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Applicant. ... Let the Applicant- Taiyyab Khan, involved in Crime No. 597/2024 registered at Police Station Civil Lines District Bilaspur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 69, 351(2) of BNS....

CHANDRAPRATAP vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

2025 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 6082 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

(C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 69 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (for short ‘BNS’). ... 2025:CGHC:9162 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 1483 of 2025 Chandrapratap S/o Basant Singh Aged About 25 Years R/o Sukharital, Korbi, Police Station Pasan, District Korba (C.G.) ... ... Let the Applicant-Chandrapratap, involved in Crime No. 21/2025 registered at Police Station Khadgawan, District Manendragarh- Chirmiri-Bharatpur (C.G.) for the offence punishable un....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top