SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Gau) 906

VIJAY BISHNOI, KARDAK ETE
Dasarath Ray @ Dipjyoti Roy – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam Rep. By The P. P. , Assam. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. B. Bora, Advocate Mr. P.S. Raja, Advocate
For the Respondent:Ms. B. Bhuyan, Sr. Advocate Ms. M. Chakraborty, Advocate Ms. R. Das, Advocate Mr. M. Sarania, Advocate

Judgement Key Points

Key Points: - The Court held that a juvenile can file anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. before actual apprehension, despite the Juvenile Justice Act not using the term "arrest" (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) . - There is no express bar in the Juvenile Justice Act 2015 preventing applicability of Section 438 Cr.P.C.; the Act is a complete code for post-apprehension matters, but does not negate pre-apprehension bail rights under Cr.P.C. (!) (!) . - The reference was answered affirmatively: anticipatory bail applications by juveniles are maintainable under Section 438 Cr.P.C. or BNSS Section 482, as applicable, before apprehension (!) (!) . - The Allahabad High Court's reasoning in Mohammad Zaid v. State of U.P. and the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Jatin v. State of Punjab supported maintainability; Kara Taling’s view was disagreed in this judgment (!) (!) (!) . - BNSS Section 482 provides directional bail for a person who believes they may be arrested on a non-bailable offense, including conditions for interrogation and travel restrictions; this is discussed as the applicable framework post-2024 (!) (!) (!) (!) .

What is the maintainability of an Anticipatory Bail Application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. by a juvenile before actual apprehension?

What is the effect of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 on the applicability of Section 438 Cr.P.C. for juveniles?

What is the scenario under BNSS (Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) regarding anticipatory bail for a person apprehending arrest?


JUDGMENT :

Vijay Bishnoi, CJ.

1. Heard Mr. B. Bora, learned counsel appearing for the applicant. Also heard Ms. B. Bhuyan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam, appearing for the respondent State of Assam.

2. The matter is placed before us to answer the following question referred to us by the learned Single Judge in this Anticipatory Bail Application.

    “Whether an application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is maintainable by a juvenile before he is actually apprehended on accusation of having committed a non-bailable office?”

3. The events leading to place this Reference before this Court are as under:

    A learned Single Judge of this Court, in the case of Kara Taling vs. The State of Arunachal Pradesh, reported in 2022 (3) GLT 828 (Anticipatory Bail Application No. 40/2022, decided on 27.04.2022) , has dismissed the Anticipatory Bail Application filed on behalf of a juvenile, while passing the following order:

    “7. Having heard the submissions of learned Advocates of both side, I have carefully gone through the petition and the documents placed on record and also perused the case laws referred by them. Admittedly, there is no decided case law of Hon’ble Su

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top