AI Overview...
- Sections 420, 409, 467, 468, 471 - Main Points and Insights:
- These sections relate to criminal offenses involving cheating, criminal breach of trust, forgery, and forgery-related offences. Many judgments involve cases under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Prevention of Corruption Act, where allegations include misappropriation of funds, forgery, and criminal conspiracy Sajal Chakraborty VS State of Jharkhand - Jharkhand, State of Gujarat VS Jethisinh Kulubava Padhiyar - Gujarat, 01300074909, S. P. Jalan VS State of U. P. - Allahabad.
- Bail Considerations:
- Courts have generally refused anticipatory bail when serious allegations are involved, especially at early stages of investigation, citing the gravity of offences under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, and 471 IPC.
- However, in some cases, bail has been granted when the investigation was at an advanced stage, or where the accused was not named in FIRs, or there was no need for custodial interrogation IN THE MATTER OF: Francis Daniel Lee VS State - Delhi, JAGDISHBHAI PUNJABHAI VS STATE OF GUJARAT - Gujarat, In The Matter Of: Francis Daniel Lee VS State - Delhi.
- The courts emphasize the importance of balancing the seriousness of charges with the principles of bail, considering factors like the stage of investigation, the nature of the offence, and the likelihood of absconding.
- Analysis and Conclusion:
- The jurisprudence indicates a cautious approach to granting anticipatory bail in cases involving serious financial crimes under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, and 471 IPC, especially where the allegations involve large-scale misappropriation or forgery.
- While bail can be granted in certain circumstances, courts tend to deny it if the investigation is at an initial stage or if the offense is grave, to prevent tampering with evidence or fleeing.
- Each case's factual matrix, stage of investigation, and the accused's conduct are pivotal in deciding bail applications in such offences Sajal Chakraborty VS State of Jharkhand - Jharkhand, State of Gujarat VS Jethisinh Kulubava Padhiyar - Gujarat, IN THE MATTER OF: Francis Daniel Lee VS State - Delhi.
References: - Sajal Chakraborty VS State of Jharkhand - Jharkhand - State of Gujarat VS Jethisinh Kulubava Padhiyar - Gujarat - STATE OF GUJARAT VS LAXMANSINH CHANDRASINH PADHIYAR - Gujarat - Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh VS State of U. P. - Supreme Court - Vikas Chawla VS State Of Uttar Pradesh - Supreme Court - IN THE MATTER OF: Francis Daniel Lee VS State - Delhi - In The Matter Of: Francis Daniel Lee VS State - Delhi - JAGDISHBHAI PUNJABHAI VS STATE OF GUJARAT - Gujarat - Uaday Singh VS State - Delhi - S. P. Jalan VS State of U. P. - Allahabad
Search Results for "Bail Judgment on 420 409 420 409 467 468"
2018 0 Supreme(Jhk) 1611 • India - Jharkhand
APARESH KUMAR SINGH
Prevention of Corruption Act – Section 13 – Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 120-B, 409, 420, 467, 468 ... CBI-1, for the offence under Sections 120-B r/w Section 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 477-A of the Indian Penal Code r/w Section 13(2) ... Case vide impugned judgment passed by Additional Judicial Commissioner-VII cum Special Judge (A.H.D.) ... CBI-1, Ranchi for the offence under Sections 120-B r/w Section 409, #....
2008 0 Supreme(Guj) 527 • India - Gujarat
D.N.PATEL
409, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120(B) and 114 - Criminal Revision Application has been preferred by the State of Gujarat against the judgment ... with offence registered with Police Station, for offence punishable under Sections 406, 420, 417, 408, 409, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120 ... has been granted to accused, under Section 167(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure,1973 - Against this judgment and award, State has ... (iii) It appears that the....
2008 0 Supreme(Guj) 125 • India - Gujarat
D.N.PATEL
Allegation against the respondent is that an amount of Rs.1,08,33,429/- has been misappropriated of the Baroda Central
2009 2 Supreme 600 • India - Supreme Court
MARKANDEY KATJU, V.S.SIRPURKAR
, 468, 471, 420, 409 ... High Court by impugned judgment refused to quash the F.I.R. but directed that if appellant surrendered within 10 days, his bail ... – High Court by impugned judgment refused to quash the F.I.R. but directed that if appellant surrendered within 10 days, his ... The aforesaid writ Petition was filed for quashing the F.I.R. in case Crime No.1133/2007 under Sections 467, 468, 471, 420, 409 an....
2021 0 Supreme(SC) 900 • India - Supreme Court
A.M.KHANWILKAR, DINESH MAHESHWARI
Prevention of Corruption Act - Section 13(2) – Indian Penal Code,1860 - Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 ... and 120-B – Anticipatory Bail - Exception to judgment and order - All other co-accused who were instrumental in involving appellant ... Deewan Housing Finance Limited (for short 'DHFL') as brokerage charges as has been done in case of other brokers are already on bail ... Sections 409, 420, 467, 46....
2022 0 Supreme(Del) 699 • India - Delhi
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Criminal Procedure code, 1973 - Section 438 – Indian Penal Code, 1860 – 406, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120 ... Result: Bail applications dismissed ... -B – Seeking grant of anticipatory bail - Petitioner submits that FIRs does not name Petitioner - He states that when Petitioner’ ... at Police Station EOW under Sections 406/409/420/467/468/471/120-B IPC. ... FIR No. 63/2020 dated 01.07.2020 registered at Police St....
• India - Delhi
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Criminal Procedure code, 1973 - Section 438 – Indian Penal Code, 1860 – 406, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120 ... -B – Seeking grant of anticipatory bail - Petitioner submits that FIRs does not name Petitioner - He states that when Petitioner’ ... based on documents only and that there is no need for custodial interrogation of Petitioner and he should be granted anticipatory bail ... at Police Station EOW under Sections 406/409/420/467/....
2022 0 Supreme(Guj) 521 • India - Gujarat
A.S.SUPEHIA
Section 438 - Bail - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 406, 420, 409, 120B, 467, 468 and 471 - The court granted bail to the ... the offences under Sections 406, 420, 409, 120B, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. ... , 409, 120B, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. ... I-11210060212461 of 2021 registered with Varachha Police Station, ....
2020 0 Supreme(Del) 461 • India - Delhi
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Bail - Misappropriation - IPC 409/420/506/467/468/471/120-B - EPFO Act, Section 409/420/506/467/468/471/120-B - The court discussed ... the offenses punishable under IPC Sections 409, 420, 506, 467, 468, 471, 120-B and their application in the context of misappropriation ... highlighted the serious nature of the allegations and the advanced stage of the investig....
2010 0 Supreme(All) 3400 • India - Allahabad
RAVINDRA SINGH
Bail Application - Criminal Misappropriation - Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C. - The court discussed the charges under ... sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C. and the legality of the charge framed by the learned C.J.M. concerned. ... Jalan, filed a second bail application in a case involving allegations of criminal misappropriation under sections 409, 420, 4....
Filter by Legal Phrase
