AI Overview...
-
Balasubramaniam as a Prominent Developer and Litigant - Multiple sources identify Balasubramaniam as a key figure involved in property development and legal proceedings related to flats, including representations before courts and involvement in disputes over flats and land. He has filed writ petitions challenging government notices and project approvals, indicating active engagement in property rights issues V. P. BALASUBRAMANIAM—Decree-holder VS SRI J AIANJANEY A ASSOCIATES - Consumer, O. Muthu VS Jothilakshmi @ Jothi - Madras.
-
Development Projects and Flat Ownership - Balasubramaniam is associated with multiple residential projects, including the construction and sale of flats. For instance, he challenged public notices for HIG flats in Puliyur Village and was involved in cases concerning the allotment and occupation of flats, highlighting his role in large-scale residential developments O. Muthu VS Jothilakshmi @ Jothi - Madras, V. P. BALASUBRAMANIAM VS JAIANJANEYA ASSOCIATES - Consumer.
-
Legal Disputes and Court Proceedings - Courts have addressed issues involving Balasubramaniam, including petitions against government actions, disputes over property titles, and challenges to project approvals. Notably, courts have emphasized procedural compliance and the importance of proper parties being impleaded in suits, with some rulings referencing his cases as illustrative of broader property law principles O. Muthu VS Jothilakshmi @ Jothi - Madras, N. Rangarajan VS Lakshmi Krishnan and Others - Madras, Master Neel Dayal VS Someshwar Dayal - Delhi.
-
Construction and Sale of Flats - Several sources mention the construction status of flats, with some projects nearly complete and flats ready for occupation, while others faced delays or legal challenges related to approvals, title, or construction quality V. P. BALASUBRAMANIAM VS JAIANJANEYA ASSOCIATES - Consumer, Sakthi Durga Builders and Developers, Rep. by its Managing Partner VS P. S. Raman - Madras.
-
Property and Land Issues - Cases involving property partition, land acquisition, and land use rights are discussed, with references to property being part of joint family or individual holdings, and disputes over land titles and construction rights Master Neel Dayal VS Someshwar Dayal - Delhi, Meenakshi Apartments, Unit of MIG. Flats, Madurai-20 and others VS The Tamil Nadu Housing Board, Madras-35 - Madras.
-
Insights - Balasubramaniam's activities reflect the complexities of property development, legal compliance, and dispute resolution in Indian real estate. His involvement in high-profile cases underscores the importance of legal clarity in property transactions and project approvals.
Analysis and Conclusion:
Balasubramaniam is a significant figure in the realm of property development and legal disputes concerning flats and land in India. His engagements span project development, legal challenges, and advocacy, illustrating the multifaceted nature of real estate law. The references highlight the need for proper legal procedures, adherence to regulations, and clear title documentation in property dealings. His cases serve as examples of the legal intricacies faced by developers and property owners alike.
References:
- V. P. BALASUBRAMANIAM—Decree-holder VS SRI J AIANJANEY A ASSOCIATES - Consumer, Laxmidas Thakkar VS State Government of Maharashtra - Bombay, O. Muthu VS Jothilakshmi @ Jothi - Madras, V. P. BALASUBRAMANIAM VS JAIANJANEYA ASSOCIATES - Consumer, Meenakshi Apartments, Unit of MIG. Flats, Madurai-20 and others VS The Tamil Nadu Housing Board, Madras-35 - Madras, Sakthi Durga Builders and Developers, Rep. by its Managing Partner VS P. S. Raman - Madras, Master Neel Dayal VS Someshwar Dayal - Delhi, Satheesh Kumar VS K. Balasubramanian - Kerala, Kerala State Housing Board VS P. V. Balasubramoniam - Consumer, N. Rangarajan VS Lakshmi Krishnan and Others - Madras
Search Results for "Balasubramaniam Flats"
• India - Consumer
S.P.SIVAPRAKASAM, BANUMATHI BASKARAN, M.S.JANARTHANAM
Balasubramaniam represented before us that their learned Counsel Mr. V.S. ... Balasubramaniam. ... 2. The 1st opposite party-Ms. Suprabha is a promoter and developer of flats. The 2nd opposite party Mr. A.D. Vasudevan is her power agent. ... 3.
2012 0 Supreme(Bom) 624 • India - Bombay
S.A.BOBDE, R.D.DHANUKA
The Learned Counsel invited our attention to the order passed by this Court on 24th August, 1999 in Writ Petition No. 1388 of 1999 filed by Gayatri Balasubramaniam against State of Maharashtra and others including Respondent No.2 herein, the Order dated 3rd April, 2000 passed by the Division Bench of ... It is contended that Respondent No.2 had launched eight new projects and extended the existing ones comprising of 2208 flats/shops aggregating to about 14,46,531 sq.ft. ... It is the case of the Petitioner that the Petitioners had purchased flats....
2021 0 Supreme(Mad) 1011 • India - Madras
R.SUBBIAH, R.PONGIAPPAN
again and it would amount to re-arguing case, which is legally not permissible under garb of a review - It is evidently clear that Balasubramanian ... Not stopping with that venture, Balasubramanian also filed another writ petition in W.P.No.1476 of 2011, wherein he challenged the public notice issued by the Housing Board, inviting applications for the purchase of the proposed HIG Flats, to be constructed in the subject property. ... HIG Flats in T.S.No.16/3, Block No.38, Puliyur Village, Kodambakkam Division, Egmore-Nun....
• India - Consumer
ANGEL ARULRAJ, E.J.BELLIE, PULAVAR V.S.KANDASAMY
Bellie, President—The 1st opposite party is a Promoter and Developer of flats and the 2nd opposite party is her power agent. ... The opposite parties have completed 95% of the construction and the flats are ready for occupation except for the few minor works to be done. The complainants have been avoiding payments of the balance amount due from them and also the escalated cost.
1992 0 Supreme(Mad) 405 • India - Madras
SRINIVASAN
The members of the associations were allotted middle income group flats in 1979-80. With respect to the petitioner association in W.P.No.7061 of 1986 the allotment letter was issued on 23. 1980. ... This is not case in which a direction similar to that given by Justice Balasubramanyam in S.ANo.83 of 1982 can be given. It is specifically alleged in the affidavit filed in support of the petitions that the land cost was already fixed as the acquisition proceedings were over even before 1972. ... A-12/ 3 one of the flats concerned in W.P.No.7....
2022 0 Supreme(Mad) 359 • India - Madras
Civil Procedure Code,1908 – Section 96 - Contract Act, 1856 – Section 202 -Flats – Loan – Construction - ... - As consideration, defendants agreed to pay certain sum and hand over 2 flats constructed at the estimated costs - A general power ... over title documents in original - Asbestos sheet shed and 5 feet compound wall was demolished to put up apartment consisting of 7 flats ... After an inordinate delay of 3 years, the defendant completed the construction and without any valid authorisation had sold 10 flats out of ....
2017 0 Supreme(Del) 3308 • India - Delhi
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Balasubramaniam 1979 SCC OnLine Mad 356 Fact of the Case: The plaintiffs sought partition of a property claiming it ... Balasubramaniam 1979 SCC OnLine Mad 356 held that the property in the hands of a bachelor could not acquire the status of a joint family property or HUF property. ... 18. ... in the overall property; ... (vi) that in terms of the aforesaid settlement, in or about the year 1990-1992 construction was carried out in the back portion of the property with the front portion comprising of a house with four bedrooms etc. and the rear portion com....
2021 0 Supreme(Ker) 323 • India - Kerala
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
There are many residential houses and flats around the building. It abuts the corporation road.
• India - Consumer
T.M.HASSAN PILLAI, A.RADHA
the plight of the ordinary citizens who have the misfortune to deal with such a statutory body by getting allotment of plots or flats ... Balasubramaniam who is a senior member of the Thiruvananthapuram Bar and respected by the members of the bar had to approach the CDRF, Thiruvananthapuram for redressal of his grievance by filing a complaint before that forum as OP. 611/98 as he was aggrieved by the demand made by the appellant herein ... If this is the sad plight of a Senior Lawyer it is only imaginable the plight of the ordinary citizens who have the mi....
1990 0 Supreme(Mad) 840 • India - Madras
SOMASUNDARAM
Deed-Construction-Purchase of land and flats-Undivided share in the land conveyed without mentioning about the garage in the Sale-deed ... Another reason given by the lower appellate Court for non-suiting the plaintiff is that one of the co-owners of the A Schedule property viz., K.R.Shantha Balasubramaniam, had not been impleaded as a party in the suit. ... Division No.98, together with the superstructure thereon known as garage with verandah 16 x 9’ separate both and latrine on ground floor on the north-western side of plot No.4, bounded on the east by o....
Filter by Legal Phrase
