AI Overview...
- Bhagavan Swaroop - Main points and insights:
- The case of Bhagavan Swaroop vs. Moolchand (Supreme Court) emphasizes the importance of following proper legal procedures to ensure justice (00200012475).
- In another judgment, Bhagavan Swaroop was examined regarding the capability of a party to depose, noting that reliance on medical certificates alone is insufficient and that the presence of key parties like Bhagavan Swaroop Bhagavati Prasad is crucial for court proceedings (00200023810).
- Various cases involving Bhagavan Swaroop, including criminal and procedural matters, highlight his involvement or references in legal contexts, such as charges under IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act, and his role in police investigations (00900037676, 02500030425).
- The judgment references the significance of property and dedication to the public in relation to Bhagavan Swaroop, citing historical judgments like Babu Bhagavan Din v. Gir Har Saroop, emphasizing that property acquired by grant to an individual or family does not imply public dedication unless explicitly clear (00800013211).
- In legal discussions, Bhagavan Swaroop's name appears in relation to evidentiary issues, including the disclosure of names in inquest reports and the admissibility of evidence, as seen in cases like Brahm Swaroop v. State of U.P. and Bhargavan v. State of Kerala (01500034716).
- Analysis and Conclusion:
- The references to Bhagavan Swaroop across multiple judgments indicate his significance in legal proceedings, often as a party or witness, and highlight the importance of procedural adherence and proper evidence handling.
- His involvement in criminal cases and investigations underscores his role in the judicial process, with courts emphasizing the need for credible testimony and proper procedure.
- The historical and legal context provided by these judgments reflects the broader legal principles related to property, public dedication, and evidence, illustrating Bhagavan Swaroop's recurring presence in legal jurisprudence.
- Overall, Bhagavan Swaroop's case law underscores the necessity of following legal procedures for justice, the importance of credible testimony, and the careful handling of evidence in Indian law.
References: - 00200012475 - 00200023810 - 00900037676 - 02500030425 - 00800013211 - 01500034716
Search Results for "Bhagavan Swaroop"
1996 0 Supreme(AP) 238 • India - Andhra Pradesh
S.V.MARUTHI
Therefore, as pointed out by the Supreme Court in Bhagavan Swaroop vs. Moolchand (4 supra) the Laws procedure should be used for advancing justice and to further its ends. ... In support of their contention, the learned counsel relied on the following judgments in Bhagavan Swaroap vs. Modi Chand and B. Venkataperayya vs. G. Adilakshmi. ... ... ( 17 ) AS against the above in Bhagawan Swaroop vs. Moolchand (4 supra) the supreme Court took the view that addition of parties under Order 1 ....
1968 0 Supreme(AP) 4 • India - Andhra Pradesh
A.RAGHUVIR, ANANTA NARAYANA AYYAR
He held that so far at the party (first defendant-Bhagawan Swaroop Bhagavati prasad) was concerned it was not shown satisfactorily that he was incapable due to reasons of health to come and depose in the Court at Cuddapah, he also held that much reliance could not be placed on the medical certificate ... The learned Judge also observed that there was no valid reason as to why any partner other than Bhagwan Swaroop bhagavati Prasad could not be examined.
• India - Calcutta
ASHIM KUMAR ROY
The appeal was heard by a Division Bench and same was dismissed, so far that relates to the order of acquittal of Ram Swaroop in respect of all offences. ... So far as, Ram Swaroop was concerned he did not interfere with the order of acquittal passed by the Division Bench. ... Then two separate Special Leave Petitions were filed before the Hon'ble Apex Court. ... In addition to that Bhagat Ram was also charged under Section 161/218/347/389 IPC and under Section 5(1)(a) read with Section 5(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, while Ram Swaroop#HL_E....
2009 0 Supreme(All) 943 • India - Allahabad
SHIV CHARAN SHARMA, VIJAY KUMAR VERMA
After recording the statement of head-moharrir Ram Swaroop, S. I. K. K. Sharma went on the place of incident and after making spot inspection, prepared site plan Ext. Ka 15. ... On the basis of this written report, the then head moharrir Ram Swaroop prepared chick FIR Ext. Ka 20 and registered a case under sections 147, 148, 149, 307 IPC at crime No. 239/76 at 9. 30 a. m. on 03. 08. 1976 against the accused persons named above. ... AIR 2003 SC 539, Bhargavan and others vs. State of Kerala 2004 Cri. L. J. 646 (SC), Shri Gopal and another v....
2000 0 Supreme(Pat) 92 • India - Patna
SHIVA KIRTI SINGH, N.PANDEY
In para 15 of the said judgment his Lordships considered the judgment of Privy Council in the case of Babu Bhagavan Din V/s. ... Gir Har Saroop, AIR 1940 PC 7 and quoted with approval the following abstract from the said judgment :"Dedication to the public is not to be readily inferred when it is known that the temple property was acquired by grant to an individual or family.
2014 0 Supreme(Ker) 228 • India - Kerala
K.T.SANKARAN, M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS
As regards the entry in the relevant column in the inquest report, the law is well settled in Brahm Swaroop and another v. State of U.P. (AIR 2011 SC 280), where the Supreme Court held thus: ... “7. ... In Bhargavan v. State of Kerala (AIR 2004 SC 1058) also, the Supreme Court held that non-disclosure of the names of the assailants to the Doctor is really of no consequence. ... (Vide Bhargavan v. State of Kerala : AIR 2004 SC 1058; Masalti and others v. State of U.P.: AIR 1965 SC 202; State of U.P. V. Dan Singh and others: (1997) 3 SCC 7....
2008 0 Supreme(Ori) 704 • India - Orissa
P.K.TRIPATHY, N.PRUSTY
The accused-Appellant Ashok alias Gopal Das has also relied on the case of Ram Swaroop and Ors. v. State of Rajasthan, (2004) 28 OCR (SC) 638. State of U.P. v. Punni and Ors. (2008) 39 OCR (SC) 531 and State of Orissa v. ... In defence, the accused persons examined D.W.1 Bhagaban Panda, a Pharmacist in the Headquarters Hospital, Bhadrak to prove the Indoor Patients' Register, Exts. D and D/1. Spot map, Ext.A, Xerox copy of the F.I.R. of P.S.
1987 0 Supreme(Raj) 905 • India - Rajasthan
JASRAJ CHOPRA
Ram Swaroop, 1985 ACJ 594 (Rajasthan) . I further place reliance in this respect on a decision of the Gujarat High Court in United India Fire & General Ins. Co. Ltd. v. Hemlata, 1986 ACJ 1085 (Gujarat) . ... Bhagaban Sahu, 1971 ACJ 49 (Orissa) . In all these authorities quoted above, it has been held that it is not open to an insurance company to raise the plea that the policy lapsed on the transfer of a vehicle in an action by third parties for compensation.
2013 0 Supreme(All) 1804 • India - Allahabad
UMA NATH SINGH, DEVI PRASAD SINGH, SATISH CHANDRA
Bhargavan Pillai v. ... Kamal Swaroop Tondon, AIR 2008 SC 1235; in “RV”, A Judicial Officer, JT 2004 (8) SC 539; Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. V. Bibhuti Kumar Singh and others, 1994 Supp (3) SCC 628; B.C. Chaturvedi v. Union of India and others, 1995 (6) SCC 749.
2019 0 Supreme(Del) 667 • India - Delhi
HIMA KOHLI, MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Swaroop Nagar, whereby the appellants have been held guilty for the offences punishable under Sections 302/326/34 IPC. ... On the basis of this statement, FIR bearing No.24/2012 (Ex.PW-1/C) under Sections 302/307/34 IPC was registered at PS Swaroop Nagar. ... 5. ... J-964, Gali No.2, Swaroop Nagar-Kayi Log H-Jo Kirpan Nikal Kar Lad Rahe H”. In the meantime, the said information was also forwarded to the local police which was recorded vide DD No.64-B (Ex.PW-1/A) at 11:27 p.m. ... As per the Trial Court record, the deceased has been shown ....
Filter by Legal Phrase
