AI Overview...
-
Khasra Numbers and Land Records - The nature of khasra no. 2517, 2521, and 2523 was not clarified by the original applicant or the Rajasthan State; the conversion order for khasra no. 2517 (pertaining to a petrol pump) was executed through proper procedures. Khasra no. 739 is a separate entity and not part of Dharam Talab; similarly, khasra no. 707 is outside the catchment area. There is evidence of deceit in the applicant's submission, as the Bhoomi-abhilekh record mentions khasra no. 739, but not 739/1, indicating misrepresentation. SHRI OMPRAKASH SOMANI VS 1. STATE OF RAJASTHAN THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY - National Green Tribunal, SHRI OMPRAKASH SOMANI VS 1. STATE OF RAJASTHAN THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY - National Green Tribunal, SHRI OMPRAKASH SOMANI VS 1. STATE OF RAJASTHAN THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY - National Green Tribunal, SHRI OMPRAKASH SOMANI VS 1. STATE OF RAJASTHAN THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY - National Green Tribunal
-
Legal and Procedural Validity - The establishment of the petrol pump on khasra no. 2517 was carried out following due legal procedures, including obtaining a No Objection Certificate. The land records and conversion orders support the legitimacy of the land use, and the separate khasra no. 739 is not part of the disputed Dharam Talab. The applicant's claims of encroachment are challenged based on these documented facts. SHRI OMPRAKASH SOMANI VS 1. STATE OF RAJASTHAN THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY - National Green Tribunal, SHRI OMPRAKASH SOMANI VS 1. STATE OF RAJASTHAN THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY - National Green Tribunal, SHRI OMPRAKASH SOMANI VS 1. STATE OF RAJASTHAN THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY - National Green Tribunal, SHRI OMPRAKASH SOMANI VS 1. STATE OF RAJASTHAN THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY - National Green Tribunal
-
Distance and Location Certificates - Certificates from Patwar Mandal and Gram Panchayat provide differing distances from the site to nearby locations, with some discrepancies noted between official documents and local representations. These details are relevant for establishing site proximity and potential encroachment issues. RAJENDRA PRASAD AHARI Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN - Rajasthan, NARAYAN SINGH SOLANKI Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN - Rajasthan
Analysis and Conclusion: The documentation indicates that the land in question involves multiple khasra numbers with unclear or unverified explanations from the applicant. The proper legal procedures for land conversion, especially for khasra no. 2517, appear to have been followed. The separate khasra no. 739 is not part of Dharam Talab, and evidence suggests attempts to misrepresent land records. Distance certificates show some inconsistencies but do not fundamentally alter the legal standing of the land use. Overall, the records support the legitimacy of the petrol pump's establishment and challenge claims of unauthorized encroachment or misclassification.
Search Results for "Bhoo Dharak Certificate"
• India - National Green Tribunal BHOPAL (CENTRAL ZONE BENCH)
Mr. Justice Sudhir Agarwal
Dr. Afroz Ahmad
nature of khasra no. 2517, 2521 and 2523 was not explained by original applicant and State of Rajasthan; conversion order khasra no. 2517 regarding establishment of petrol pump was through due procedure; No Objection Certificate ... 739 but is a separate khasra no. and hence, it is not a part of Dharam talab. 4. ... 707 is not a part of catchment area; the applicant filed documents deceitfully in as much as in Bhoo-abhilekh record, khasra no. 739 has been mentioned and there is no mention of khasra no. 739 but 739/1.
• India - National Green Tribunal BHOPAL (CENTRAL ZONE BENCH)
Mr. Justice Sudhir Agarwal
Dr. Afroz Ahmad
nature of khasra no. 2517, 2521 and 2523 was not explained by original applicant and State of Rajasthan; conversion order khasra no. 2517 regarding establishment of petrol pump was through due procedure; No Objection Certificate ... 739 but is a separate khasra no. and hence, it is not a part of Dharam talab. 4. ... 707 is not a part of catchment area; the applicant filed documents deceitfully in as much as in Bhoo-abhilekh record, khasra no. 739 has been mentioned and there is no mention of khasra no. 739 but 739/1.
• India - National Green Tribunal BHOPAL (CENTRAL ZONE BENCH)
Mr. Justice Sudhir Agarwal
Dr. Afroz Ahmad
nature of khasra no. 2517, 2521 and 2523 was not explained by original applicant and State of Rajasthan; conversion order khasra no. 2517 regarding establishment of petrol pump was through due procedure; No Objection Certificate ... 739 but is a separate khasra no. and hence, it is not a part of Dharam talab. 4. ... 707 is not a part of catchment area; the applicant filed documents deceitfully in as much as in Bhoo-abhilekh record, khasra no. 739 has been mentioned and there is no mention of khasra no. 739 but 739/1.
• India - National Green Tribunal BHOPAL (CENTRAL ZONE BENCH)
Mr. Justice Sudhir Agarwal
Dr. Afroz Ahmad
nature of khasra no. 2517, 2521 and 2523 was not explained by original applicant and State of Rajasthan; conversion order khasra no. 2517 regarding establishment of petrol pump was through due procedure; No Objection Certificate ... 739 but is a separate khasra no. and hence, it is not a part of Dharam talab. 4. ... 707 is not a part of catchment area; the applicant filed documents deceitfully in as much as in Bhoo-abhilekh record, khasra no. 739 has been mentioned and there is no mention of khasra no. 739 but 739/1.
2023 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 892 • India - National Green Tribunal BHOPAL (CENTRAL ZONE BENCH)
Bhilwara on 09.08.2008; school was constructed through duly established procedure; nature of khasra no. 2517, 2521 and 2523 was not explained by original applicant and State of Rajasthan; conversion order khasra no. 2517 regarding establishment of petrol pump was through due procedure; No Objection Certificate ... The contention is that survey no. 739/1 is not part of survey no. 739 but is a separate khasra no. and hence, it is not a part of Dharam talab. 4. ... The further ground stated in review Application is that khasra no. 707 is not a part of catchm....
2025 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 12543 • India - High Court of Rajasthan (Jodhpur Bench)
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE, SANJEET PUROHIT
The Patwar Mandal, Binjasar has issued a certificate dated 17.04.2025 with regard to the distance, whereas he submits that another issue of Gram Panchayat Meethe Ka Tala showing an approximate distance 12 kilometer, the Sub Division Officer has reflected the distance to only 5.5 kilometers between the ... Anwar Khan S/o Shri Mohammad Khan, Aged About 56 Years, Resident Of Pol Ji Dairy, Post Bhoo, District Jaisalmer, Rajasthan. 2. Gafur Khan, Aged About 38 Years, Resident Of Pol Ji Dairy, Post Bhoo, District Jaisalmer, Rajasthan. 3. ... Ra....
2025 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 12544 • India - High Court of Rajasthan (Jodhpur Bench)
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE, SANJEET PUROHIT
The Patwar Mandal, Binjasar has issued a certificate dated 17.04.2025 with regard to the distance, whereas he submits that another issue of Gram Panchayat Meethe Ka Tala showing an approximate distance 12 kilometer, the Sub Division Officer has reflected the distance to only 5.5 kilometers between the ... Anwar Khan S/o Shri Mohammad Khan, Aged About 56 Years, Resident Of Pol Ji Dairy, Post Bhoo, District Jaisalmer, Rajasthan. 2. Gafur Khan, Aged About 38 Years, Resident Of Pol Ji Dairy, Post Bhoo, District Jaisalmer, Rajasthan. 3. ... Ra....
