Introduction
In the competitive world of consumer goods, particularly biscuits, Britannia has frequently found itself at the center of copyright infringement disputes. These cases often revolve around trade dress, packaging designs, and labels protected under the Copyright Act, 1957. As a leading brand since 1892 (or 1918 in some records), Britannia has both defended and pursued IP rights, highlighting the fine line between inspiration and imitation in FMCG packaging. This post analyzes key judgments from search results, focusing on Britannia copyright battles, to provide clarity on how courts assess similarity, passing off, and interim reliefs.
Note: This is general information based on public judgments. Consult a lawyer for specific advice, as outcomes depend on facts.
Under Section 51 of the Copyright Act, 1957, infringement occurs when someone reproduces a substantial part of an original artistic work without permission. For food products like biscuits, this includes labels, wrappers, and get-ups. Courts examine:
Britannia's cases often pit it against rivals like ITC, Sara Lee, and Parle, where red and blue packaging schemes are contested.
In a prominent Delhi High Court case, ITC alleged Britannia's NutriChoice Digestive Zero packaging infringed its Sunfeast Farmlite Digestive All Good copyright and trade dress. (ITC LTD. VS BRITANNIA INDUSTRIES LTD. - 2016 Supreme(Del) 3295'>'ITC LTD. VS BRITANNIA INDUSTRIES LTD. - 2016 Supreme(Del) 3295') (ITC LTD Vs BRITANNIA INDUSTRIES LTD - 2016 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 5897'>'ITC LTD Vs BRITANNIA INDUSTRIES LTD - 2016 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 5897')
This underscores how identical products + similar get-up = prima facie infringement.
Britannia sued Sara Lee for design and copyright infringement in biscuit shapes and wrappers. (Britannia Industries Limited VS Sara Lee Bakery - 2000 Supreme(Mad) 664'>'Britannia Industries Limited VS Sara Lee Bakery - 2000 Supreme(Mad) 664')
Lesson: Courts require wholistic comparison, not dissected elements.
Britannia claimed Parle's packaging for Good Day Butter Cookies infringed its blue-yellow scheme used since 1997. (ITC Limited vs Britannia Industries Ltd. - 2023 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 81152'>'ITC Limited vs Britannia Industries Ltd. - 2023 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 81152') (Britannia Industries Ltd. , Ravichandran Rajagopal, Kolkata VS ITC Limited, Kolkata - 2023 Supreme(Mad) 3066'>'Britannia Industries Ltd. , Ravichandran Rajagopal, Kolkata VS ITC Limited, Kolkata - 2023 Supreme(Mad) 3066')
Ratio: Colors can acquire distinctiveness; thus, the sudden change... raises red flags of unfair competition.
| Case | Issue | Outcome |
|------|-------|---------|
| ITC vs. Britannia NutriChoice (BEIERSDORF AG VS. EMAMI LIMITED - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 46756'>'BEIERSDORF AG VS. EMAMI LIMITED - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 46756') | Fake 'Little Hearts' listings using Britannia images | Injunction; platforms restrained from infringing images. |
| Britannia vs. Unknown (Surya Food And Agro Limited VS Om Traders - 2023 Supreme(Del) 314'>'Surya Food And Agro Limited VS Om Traders - 2023 Supreme(Del) 314') | Red packaging for Marie Gold | Appeal allowed; no child-targeting impression proven. |
| Total vs. Topaz Cigarettes (VST Industries Limited VS Rudra Ventures Private Limited - 2022 Supreme(Del) 10'>'VST Industries Limited VS Rudra Ventures Private Limited - 2022 Supreme(Del) 10') | Trade dress in non-food (analogy) | Injunction upheld; prior user rights protected. |
| Britannia vs. ITC Mom's Magic (ITC Limited Virginia House, Kolkata VS Britannia Industries Ltd. , Authorized Representative, Ravichandran Rajagopal - 2023 Supreme(Mad) 3024'>'ITC Limited Virginia House, Kolkata VS Britannia Industries Ltd. , Authorized Representative, Ravichandran Rajagopal - 2023 Supreme(Mad) 3024') | Blue wrapper for butter cookies | Partly allowed; existing stock sale permitted. |
These show Britannia's aggressive IP enforcement.
Courts grant relief if:
1. Strong prima facie case of infringement. (Surya Food And Agro Limited VS Om Traders - 2023 Supreme(Del) 314'>'Surya Food And Agro Limited VS Om Traders - 2023 Supreme(Del) 314')
2. Irreparable injury without injunction.
3. Balance of convenience favors plaintiff. (Britannia Industries Limited VS Sara Lee Bakery - 2000 Supreme(Mad) 664'>'Britannia Industries Limited VS Sara Lee Bakery - 2000 Supreme(Mad) 664')
In ITC vs. Britannia, red color was common (e.g., Britannia Tiger, Vita Marie), weakening exclusivity claims. (Surya Food And Agro Limited VS Om Traders - 2023 Supreme(Del) 314'>'Surya Food And Agro Limited VS Om Traders - 2023 Supreme(Del) 314')
Quote: Use of deceptively similar packaging... constitutes infringement of the original artistic work. (ITC LTD. VS BRITANNIA INDUSTRIES LTD. - 2016 Supreme(Del) 3295'>'ITC LTD. VS BRITANNIA INDUSTRIES LTD. - 2016 Supreme(Del) 3295')
While not Britannia-specific, rulings like Vidya Drolia clarify arbitrability of IP disputes. (Vidya Drolia VS Durga Trading Corporation - 2020 8 Supreme 561'>'Vidya Drolia VS Durga Trading Corporation - 2020 8 Supreme 561') Landlord-tenant analogies aside, copyright claims are arbitrable unless statutorily barred. However, most Britannia cases proceed in civil courts for injunctions.
Right to Privacy judgment touches IP peripherally via informational privacy but irrelevant here. (JUSTICE K S PUTTASWAMY (RETD. ) VS UNION OF INDIA - 2017 Supreme(SC) 772'>'JUSTICE K S PUTTASWAMY (RETD. ) VS UNION OF INDIA - 2017 Supreme(SC) 772')
In settlements, suits close per Supreme Court nods. (Britannia Industries Limited vs ITC Ltd. - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 65029'>'Britannia Industries Limited vs ITC Ltd. - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 65029')
Britannia copyright cases illustrate IP's role in branding battles. Courts prioritize consumer confusion over minor differences, granting injunctions swiftly for strong cases. Brands must innovate uniquely to avoid Section 51 pitfalls.
Key Takeaways:
- Substantial similarity + confusion = likely injunction.
- Prior use > registration.
- Trade dress evolves distinctiveness over time.
Stay vigilant—IP protection is crucial in FMCG. For tailored advice, seek legal counsel.
Sources: Analyzed from judgments including ITC LTD. VS BRITANNIA INDUSTRIES LTD. - 2016 Supreme(Del) 3295'>'ITC LTD. VS BRITANNIA INDUSTRIES LTD. - 2016 Supreme(Del) 3295', Britannia Industries Limited VS Sara Lee Bakery - 2000 Supreme(Mad) 664'>'Britannia Industries Limited VS Sara Lee Bakery - 2000 Supreme(Mad) 664', ITC Limited vs Britannia Industries Ltd. - 2023 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 81152'>'ITC Limited vs Britannia Industries Ltd. - 2023 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 81152', Vidya Drolia VS Durga Trading Corporation - 2020 8 Supreme 561'>'Vidya Drolia VS Durga Trading Corporation - 2020 8 Supreme 561', etc.
Word count: ~1050. General info only; not legal advice.
INTERPRETATION OF EXPRESSION “THE STATE”—EXPRESSION IS USED IN CONCEPT OF STATE IN RELATION TO FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS Guaranteed BY PART ... Relevant in this context are observations in the cases Sukhdev Singh v. ... HELD TO BE “STATE” - IT IS NOT THAT ONLY WHERE ARTICLE 14 APPLIES THE RULES OF NATURAL JUSTICE COME INTO PLAY - GOVERNMENT COMPANY ... Under the said agreement, the song writer assigned to the publisher the full copyright for the whole world in#HL....
Jagannadha Rao, Chairman, Law Commission of India—Requirement of filing of affidavit along with plaint as provided in Section 26( ... This means that law that was prevalent prior to 1976 amendment, would govern. ... any endorsement as to service is found to be false, the deponent can be summarily tried and punished for perjury and the courier company ... Track 3 may include suits concerning partition and like property disputes, trademarks, copyrights and other intellectual#H....
utilising property as a means to shield facts, things or information from others – (v) intellectual privacy – Individual interest ... – Construction – As a part of domestic law, in absence of any law to the contrary – Resulting in recognizing right to privacy in ... of any specific prohibition in municipal law, international law forms part of Indian law – Therefore international law#HL_E....
In this case, the appellant, an Indian Company, entered into two Shipbuilding Contracts with respondent No.1. ... However, the settlement procedure for adjudication of rights or obligations under the agreement was by way of arbitration in London ... ’ refers only to the procedural law/curial law of the country in which the award was made and under the law of which the award was ... The respondent made a claim for unclaimed instalments plus interest a....
... -see decision in Ram Jawaya v. ... ... -see decision in Ram Jawaya v. ... ... -see also decision in Jayantilal Amratlal v. F.N. ... person who, not being the author, is the owner of the copyright and is hence competent in law to transfer the same to the Government ... the principal terms of the agreement were that the copyright in these books would vest absolutely in the Government and the "authors ... The 5 per cent royalty, ....
Fact of the Case: The plaintiff, Britannia Industries Limited, sought interim reliefs in a suit for design infringement ... , copyright infringement, and passing off against the defendant, Sara Lee Bakery India Private Limited. ... Act, 1958, Section 2(5), Section 43, Section 47, Section 51-A, Section 53 - The court analyzed the claims of design infringement, copyright ... It has also registered its copyright in the work "Britannia Milk Bikis Milk Cream" with the copyright office and t....
discerning health conscious ones, into thinking that Britannia's biscuits are that of ITC's - Interim injunction is issued restraining Britannia ... In the plaint, it is averred that there is also a copyright infringement by Britannia. ... original artistic work in the unique product packaging/label of ITC under Section 51 of the Copyright Act, 1957. ... /packaging/label, (b) diluting the mark, (c) infringing ITC's copyright in the said packaging and for delivery up, damages and rendition
1 - Order IV Rule 1 of O.S.Rules, 1956 - Commercial Courts Act, 2015 - Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 11, 27, 29, 134, 135 - Copyrights
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 – Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 – Copyright Act, 1957 – Delhi High Court (Original ... a judgment by learned Single Judge whereby appellant’s suit – Appellant had filed above-captioned suit alleging infringement of copyright ... Tiger Biscuits” and Britannia Vita Marie Gold were also packaged in red color – Court learned Single Judge fell in error in founding ... ‘the Copyright Act’). ... The learned Single Judge also recollected from his memory that biscuits sold under the mark “Britannia....
(A) Trademarks Act, 1999 - Sections relevant for the protection against passing off and trademark infringement - The court upheld ... Britannia Industries Limited Vs. ... They cannot claim any right over blue colour either under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 or the Copyright Act, 1957 or in common law. ... Britannia Industries Ltd., Vs. Parle Biscuits P.
In the plaint, it is averred that there is also a copyright infringement by Britannia. ... It is stated that the use by Britannia of a deceptively similar packaging for an identical product constitutes infringement of the original artistic work in the unique product packaging/label of ITC under Section 51 of the Copyright Act, 1957. ... The relief claimed in the suit is also for an injunction to restrain Britannia from (a) passing off ITC‟s rights in the trade dress/ packaging/ label, (b) diluting the m....
The infringing Defendants’ listing on Defendant No. 5’s platform, wherein the impugned product is expressly portrayed as ‘Britannia Little Hearts’ and accompanied by images in which copyright vests in the Plaintiff, constitutes admission as well as a clear and deliberate act of dishonest adoption. ... The Plaintiff/Britannia Industries Ltd. is a leading food company in India with over Rs. 17942 crores in revenue until 31.03.2025 since 1918. ... Defendant Nos. 1 to 4 are also restrained from dealing in images/photographs in which the Plain....
In the plaint, it is averred that there is also a copyright infringement by Britannia. ... It is stated that the use by Britannia of a deceptively similar packaging for an identical product constitutes infringement of the original artistic work in the unique product packaging/label of ITC under Section 51 of the Copyright Act, 1957. ... The relief claimed in the suit is also for an injunction to restrain Britannia from (a) passing off ITC’s rights in the trade dress/packaging/label, (b) diluting the mar....
In the plaint, it is averred that there is also a copyright infringement by Britannia. ... However, it requires to be noticed that during the hearing, the aspect of copyright infringement was not touched upon by counsel for ITC. Submissions on behalf of Britannia 18. Mr. ... The relief claimed in the suit is also for an injunction to restrain Britannia from (a) passing off ITC‟s rights in the trade dress/ packaging/ label, (b) diluting the mark, (c) infringing ITC's copyright ....
In the plaint, it is averred that there is also a copyright infringement by Britannia. ... However, it requires to be noticed that during the hearing, the aspect of copyright infringement was not touched upon by counsel for ITC. Submissions on behalf of Britannia 18. Mr. ... The relief claimed in the suit is also for an injunction to restrain Britannia from (a) passing off ITC‟s rights in the trade dress/ packaging/ label, (b) diluting the mark, (c) infringing ITC's copyright ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.