AI Overview...
-
Kebang Decisions and Landed Property - The sources indicate that Kebang decisions often involve disputes over land, with some decisions not explicitly addressing the execution of such decisions in respect of landed properties. In particular, the absence of formal documents or clear records (e.g., in Kaliram Regon VS Anima Taying W/o Late Talom Tayeying - Gauhati) suggests that executing Kebang decisions on landed property may be complex if formal titles or agreements are lacking.
-
Court Rulings on Property Disputes - Several court decisions (e.g., Dharam Parkash VS Kejang Butidh - Himachal Pradesh, Kiran Limboo VS Kussang Limboo - Sikkim) uphold judgments related to property disputes, including adverse possession, partition deeds, and property registration. These rulings emphasize the importance of formal documentation, proper registration, and clear title for enforcing property rights.
-
Legal Procedure and Evidence - The cases highlight that for a Kebang decision to be executable concerning landed property, there must typically be supporting documentation or legal records establishing ownership or rights. The absence of such records can hinder enforcement, as seen in disputes where property titles or boundaries are contested (Kaliram Regon VS Anima Taying W/o Late Talom Tayeying - Gauhati, Dimkio Dubi VS State of Arunachal Pradesh - Gauhati).
-
Finality of Court Decisions - Some sources (e.g., Dharam Parkash VS Kejang Butidh - Himachal Pradesh, Kiran Limboo VS Kussang Limboo - Sikkim) demonstrate that court decisions, once final, can determine property rights, but enforcement depends on the clarity and legality of the title and records. If the court's decision is against a party, execution may require proper legal procedures and recognized documentation.
-
Summary - Based on the sources, a Kebang decision can potentially be executed in respect of landed property if there are clear legal titles, proper documentation, and formal records supporting the decision. Without such, enforcement becomes problematic, and courts may require additional evidence or legal procedures to facilitate execution.
References:
- Kaliram Regon VS Anima Taying W/o Late Talom Tayeying - Gauhati, Dharam Parkash VS Kejang Butidh - Himachal Pradesh, Kiran Limboo VS Kussang Limboo - Sikkim, Dimkio Dubi VS State of Arunachal Pradesh - Gauhati
Search Results for "Can a Kebang Decision be Executed in Respect of a Landed Property"
2024 0 Supreme(Gau) 1475 • India - Gauhati
KARDAK ETE
Disputes arose leading to multiple Kebang decisions, ultimately resulting in the plaintiff's suit. ... No documents in respect of the landed property were prepared in between Sri Opak Rome and Sri Kaliram Regon. In the letter dated 30.06.1995 the name of land and its area and location was not mentioned wherein I also put my signature before the Deputy Commissioner. ... Kodang Rome was narrating him about his landed property, no one was there. The boundary of the land ....
2019 0 Supreme(HP) 1178 • India - Himachal Pradesh
VIVEK SINGH THAKUR
Final Decision: The court upheld the trial court's decision and dismissed the appeal. ... The court upheld the trial court's decision and dismissed the appeal. ... Adverse Possession - Property Dispute - Transfer of Property Act - Section 53A Fact of the Case: The plaintiff filed ... PE in respect of the suit property, the suit property is still in the name of defendant No. 2 Panma Medup and defendant No. 3 Tanzin Ghiachho but with entry in column of possession in ....
2020 0 Supreme(Sikk) 30 • India - Sikkim
MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI
based on a Partition Deed executed by his uncles. ... [FINAL DECISION] The court allowed the Defendant's appeal, set aside the judgment and decree of the trial court, and ruled in favor ... Property Dispute - Partition Deed - [FACT OF THE CASE] The case involved a property dispute between the Plaintiffs and the Defendant ... and rectify the Khatiyan Parcha of the Plaintiff No.1 and to issue a Khatiyan Parcha to the Defendant in respect of the suit property of this Counter Claim. ... Is....
2022 0 Supreme(Cal) 1127 • India - Calcutta
KESANG DOMA BHUTIA
Final Decision: C.O. 2043 of 2021 is dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands discharged. No order as to costs. ... The property is a part of addwitiya Co-operative Housing Society Limited. The respondent no. 2 Utpal Kumar Dutta is a member allottee of addwitiya Co-operative Housing Society in respect of the flat in dispute. ... The award is silent about the petitioner alleging before the arbitrator when the agreement was executed and possession was handed over to him, the flat in question was in inco....
2018 0 Supreme(Gau) 851 • India - Gauhati
AJIT BORTHAKUR
Thereafter, the collector is required to submit his report, in respect of the land to the appropriate Government, containing his recommendations on the objections with relevant record for decision of the Government. ... Learned counsel referred to the decision rendered by the Supreme Court in Krishna Bahadur v. ... Danggen, learned counsel, relying upon the decision of the Supreme Court rendered in Dr. Smti. Kuntesh Gupta v. ... In this context, the learned counsel has drawn attention to the decision of....
2024 0 Supreme(Gau) 127 • India - Gauhati
MALASRI NANDI
Final Decision: The court quashed the FIR and further proceedings, including the framing of charges, against ... punishable under section 471, section 475 or section 476, of the said code, when such offence is alleged to have been committed in respect ... decision. ... Tabit Tapak had also executed a money receipt as a mark of acknowledgment of the receipt of the cheque in question. 4. ... Second is that such offence should have been committed in respect of a document produced or given in evidence in a....
1932 0 Supreme(SC) 5 • India - Supreme Court
The basis of this decision was that the evidence did not establish the fact that the mine formed part of Tuan Kundor's estate. ... It is true that reliance was placed upon a document which was executed by Raja Prempuan in the year 1904, and it may be that the plaintiffs considered that the document sufficiently proved their case in these respects; but, as will hereafter appear, when the terms of the document are set out, it is quite ... The lease is dated 18th February 1903, but upon the evidence must, their Lordships think, be taken to h....
Filter by Legal Phrase
