AI Overview...
- Cart Track Width - The courts have addressed the issue of cart track widths in various cases, with some courts recognizing specific widths such as six feet V.KANDASWAMI Vs VEMBANNA GOUNDER (DIED) - Madras, while others have found insufficient proof of claimed widths like 13 or 40 feet R. Pattayyan VS K. Padmanabhan - Madras, S. N. Subramani VS R. Rathnasamy (died) - Madras.
- Court Judgments - The High Court has held that the appellant is entitled to a six-foot-wide cart track parallel to a water channel V.KANDASWAMI Vs VEMBANNA GOUNDER (DIED) - Madras. Conversely, other cases have involved disputes over encroachments reducing the width or the existence of a cart track of certain dimensions, with some courts ordering restoration to original widths R.Rajendran Vs The District collector - Madras, Karuppa Gounder VS Pongiyanna Gounder - Madras.
- Evidence and Proof - Several cases highlight the importance of documentary evidence in establishing the existence and width of cart tracks. For instance, some courts found that the plaintiff failed to prove the width of a cart track R. Pattayyan VS K. Padmanabhan - Madras, and others noted the absence of supporting records for claimed widths of 13 or 40 feet S. N. Subramani VS R. Rathnasamy (died) - Madras, Athappan (Deceased) VS Sengoda Gounder - Madras.
- Encroachments and Restoration - Encroachments have often led to a reduction in cart track width, prompting courts to order removal or restoration to original dimensions as per revenue records R.Rajendran Vs The District collector - Madras, Karuppa Gounder VS Pongiyanna Gounder - Madras.
- Ownership and Rights - The rights over cart tracks are sometimes contested, with courts emphasizing the need to prove ownership or right of way through proper documentation, such as release deeds or survey records Raju Naidu (died) VS Subbian - Madras, Paramasivam VS Rengasamy - Madras.
Analysis and Conclusion:
The consensus across cases suggests that the standard or recognized width of a cart track varies, with courts generally favoring a six-foot width when explicitly awarded V.KANDASWAMI Vs VEMBANNA GOUNDER (DIED) - Madras. Proven rights and proper documentation are crucial in establishing the existence and dimensions of cart tracks. Encroachments tend to diminish effective widths, but courts often order restoration to original widths as recorded in revenue or survey records. Overall, the legal recognition of cart track widths is case-specific, heavily reliant on evidence, and subject to modification based on court rulings.
Search Results for "Cart Track Width"
2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 32717 • India - Madras High Court
Honourable Mr Justice S. SOUNTHAR
EASEMENT - RIGHT OF WAY - CART TRACK - WIDTH - MODIFICATION - [The court modified the lower court's judgment and held that the ... appellant is entitled to a cart track with a width of six feet, parallel to the water channel running from the common well to the ... Finding of the Court: The High Court held that the appellant is entitled to a cart track with a width of six feet, ... It is the submission of the learned counsel that w....
2023 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 33522 • India - Madras High Court
Honourable Mr Justice D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
track to its original width within six weeks. ... within six weeks from the date of receipt of the order, restoring the cart track to its original width as per the revenue records ... Issues: Whether the encroachment on the cart track should be removed. ... The width of the cart track was 14.6 meter but due to the encroachment made by the fifth respondent, the same is considerably reduced at present. ......
2020 0 Supreme(Mad) 610 • India - Madras
G.JAYACHANDRAN
Finding of the Court: The Court found that the plaintiff failed to prove the width of the cart track and that the suit ... Issues: Width of the cart track, Limitation for filing mandatory injunction, Non-joinder of necessary party Ratio Decidendi ... track - 11 feet width - Mandatory injunction - Limitation - Advocate Commissioner's Report - Encroachment - Public street - Non-joinder ... The suit was defended on the ground that there is no 13 feet....
2019 0 Supreme(Telangana) 228 • India - Telangana
M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
track public road 10 feet width and 1350 feet length existing in Sr. ... track public road 10 feet width and 1350 feet length existing in Sr. ... farmers in the above survey numbers and that the cart track begins in Sr. ... Petitioners contend that agriculture is the only source of their livelihood; that there is a cart track public road 10 feet width and 1350 feet length existing in Sr. ... Having admitted the existence of the #HL_....
2020 0 Supreme(Mad) 1281 • India - Madras
R.SUBRAMANIAN
. – The petitioner had sued for reliefs of declaration that the width of cart track at 12 feet, mandatory injunction directing the ... the width of the cart track. – The said decree dated 12.04.2008 was put in execution in E.P.No. 6 of 2010. – A Commissioner was ... defendants 5 to 7 to restore the cart track and for permanent injunction restraining the defendants 1 to 4 and others from reducing ... The petitioner had sued for reliefs of declaration ....
2020 0 Supreme(Mad) 21 • India - Madras
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
Issues: Ownership of the property, encroachment by the defendants, validity of sub divisions made in the property, and the width ... Ex.B-9 release deed and holding that the appellant has not proved the width of the Cart track? ... the cart track. ... After the sale in favour of the said Vadivambal, only the right to take his cart is retained. Therefore, the plaintiff cannot claim ownership about the entire cart track. In fact, the ....
2019 0 Supreme(Mad) 623 • India - Madras
T.RAVINDRAN
The court found that the plaintiffs had the right of cart track through the suit property of a width of 3.8 meters east-west and ... Finding of the Court: The court found that the plaintiffs had the right of cart track through the suit property of ... Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that the plaintiffs had the right of cart track through the suit property based on the ... The trial court after holding that the plaintiff has got the right of cart#HL_....
2022 0 Supreme(Mad) 1324 • India - Madras
N. ANAND VENKATESH
The defendants claimed the existence of a 40 feet wide cart track and sought dismissal of the suit. ... Issues: Dispute over title and existence of a 40 feet wide cart track in the suit property. ... The defendants failed to prove the existence of a 40 feet wide cart track as claimed, and the documents (Ex.B-1, Ex.B-3) presented ... This never happened and the defendants never established the existence of the 40 feet width cart track#HL_EN....
2001 0 Supreme(Mad) 892 • India - Madras
A.KRISHNAMURTHY
track, and concluded that the plaintiff is entitled to only the right of pathway and not any cart track. ... Defendants contested the existence of the cart track and claimed authority to install electric poles. ... Issues: (1) Entitlement to the relief declaration relating to the suit cart track (2) Entitlement to mandatory injunction ... There are no traces of using as a cart track. ... The plaintiff claims that the cart....
2017 0 Supreme(Mad) 3814 • India - Madras
T.RAVINDRAN
However, the document marked as Ex.A2 is conspicuous as regards the absence of the suit cart track of a width of 13 feet, as described in the plaint. ... However, other than Ex.A1, there is no reference about the suit cart track. Further, even in Ex.A1, there is no mention of the existence of suit cart track of a width of 13 feet as described in the plaint. Even on that aspect, Ex.A1 does not support the plaintiffs case. ... Therefore, as rightly arg....
Filter by Legal Phrase
